Hey, we get it, you're SBSK's clone.Originally posted by Kenneth Tan Jian Wei:I thought you said SBSK applying for fare adjustment...
Very dif to define... Most is by comparisonOriginally posted by supremebull:"Better service"? Define that.
Clones!Originally posted by Kenneth Tan Jian Wei:I thought you said SBSK applying for fare adjustment...
Dun expect that... Although wages may not have gone up high, rise in disel cost has been a probOriginally posted by RaTtY81:haiz y un my boss adjust my salary aso![]()
Mind your languageOriginally posted by Bloop...:Scummy, filthy, blood-sucking, LEECHES!!!!
Please kindly refrain from posting unrelated stuff in bus forum, please remain at chit chat forum only. Thank you for your cooperation.Originally posted by Kenneth Tan Jian Wei:I thought you said SBSK applying for fare adjustment...
Without TIBS, what the blardy hell did SMRT have?Now they've junked the TIBS policy of clean buses.Filthy pigs.Originally posted by cck_190:IMO, SBST raising fare is understandable. In recent years, they have given us better service than SMRT. THey bought new buses to renew their fleet, introduced more initiatives such a Fast Forward services and more.
But for SMRT...i really think there is no excellent reason to support the hike. Their bus services deproved. No new buses are bought. No new services introduced. Buses not maintained well. Trains come at a too long frequency. They also built more new retail outlts which will bring them much more money. SMRT is a profit based money, not at all a customer based company![]()
I'd agree.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Without TIBS, what the blardy hell did SMRT have?Now they've junked the TIBS policy of clean buses.Filthy pigs.
SMRT did not try harder in getting more revenues from advertising. SMRT post $10 million whilst SBST post $18 million. SMRT has more MRT stations and trains, I would expect SMRT to get more advertising revenues.Originally posted by subarugal:wow.. y did smrt need to adjustment fare.. humh..
if not wrong smrt annual turnover is higher den sbs leh..
the got all the major mrt line compare to NEL.. which public transport mrt is taking up a big pie leh..
humh..![]()
![]()
![]()
Damned poor! After take over by SMRT!Originally posted by deathscythe99:I'd agree.
Darned...their services are poor also
Em... Actually more ppl prefer to ad on buses as the buses are moveable unlike at train stnOriginally posted by iamgoondu:SMRT did not try harder in getting more revenues from advertising. SMRT post $10 million whilst SBST post $18 million. SMRT has more MRT stations and trains, I would expect SMRT to get more advertising revenues.
See what they did to TIBS...Originally posted by subarugal:wow.. y did smrt need to adjustment fare.. humh..
if not wrong smrt annual turnover is higher den sbs leh..
the got all the major mrt line compare to NEL.. which public transport mrt is taking up a big pie leh..
humh..![]()
![]()
![]()
Dun worry... All the non aircon single decks will be gone to heaven by next year... Now they are replacing buses, which 150 aircon dd are coming in starting AugOriginally posted by Medicated Oil:When the fare increase was approved in 2002, SBS promised "better" service and all air con fleet.
Now there are still non air con buses roaming around.
Long wait for buses are still existent. (Cos they have use the $$$ to employ more pple to do time study)
Buses along NE line is always FULL.
They did not fix up the EZ Link overcharging issues despite numerous complaint.
So, on what bases can they ask for a fare increase !!!!
Dun use the raising cost and GST as the standard model answer.
As what the rest of pple is going to realise, the only thing to raise is bus fare, taxi fare, MRT fare and MP salaries, the salary of the common people is alway LEAN.
Note: 300 new aircon buses. 150 dds, 150 sd.Originally posted by sbst275:Dun worry... All the non aircon single decks will be gone to heaven by next year... Now they are replacing buses, which 150 aircon dd are coming in starting Aug