Upper East Coast 48 Buona Vista (New Service)
-
some fren says its by BBDEP and uses striders and DM3500.. wonders which services lost its buses..
-
I am talking about removing the branches that are less than 5m from the ground, not about getting rid of those trees altogether.Originally posted by sbst275:Simple...
The ones @ Henderson and Dunearn and grown on slopes
Another heavily wooded stretch of road is Upper Aljunied Rd. The reason why 100 can't get DDs is due to these trees. However, LAs served on 135 back in the 1980s.
-
SBS2707H ON SERVICE 48 TODAY.
-
They are all abv 5m... But what we fear is sekali when there is heavy rain...Originally posted by iveco:I am talking about removing the branches that are less than 5m from the ground, not about getting rid of those trees altogether.
Another heavily wooded stretch of road is Upper Aljunied Rd. The reason why 100 can't get DDs is due to these trees. However, LAs served on 135 back in the 1980s.
As for Upp Aljunied, I think can unless they clear them... No potential danger... -
The road along Tampines st 32/33 there got low lying branch and VSOs always hit the trees...Originally posted by sbst275:They are all abv 5m... But what we fear is sekali when there is heavy rain...
As for Upp Aljunied, I think can unless they clear them... No potential danger... but sumthing i notice most VO or LO dont go near to the kerbs @ tam mart there leh -
Took 48 today at around afternoon.. what i feel is that although the route is new and the demand is VERY LOW, but i do feel that in time to come, it will have a demand as high as 36. From Marina Parade to City area (bugis) it took less than 30mins.. i feel that if demand is high, possible that a DD will be deployed.
-
Em... 48 can't use DDOriginally posted by sBs_boy:Took 48 today at around afternoon.. what i feel is that although the route is new and the demand is VERY LOW, but i do feel that in time to come, it will have a demand as high as 36. From Marina Parade to City area (bugis) it took less than 30mins.. i feel that if demand is high, possible that a DD will be deployed. -
You tell mi.. for what reasons taht 48 cant be havin any of the DDs.. ??Originally posted by sbst275:Em... 48 can't use DD -
We have stated the reason somewhere around here...Originally posted by sBs_boy:You tell mi.. for what reasons taht 48 cant be havin any of the DDs.. ??
It is along Dunearn Rd... -
The Bus Driver drive quite fast today and the estimated journey is about 1 hr 10mins but I took only 50 mins. So fast!!!
-
Then.. How do you explain about the DDs on 157 ??Originally posted by sbst275:We have stated the reason somewhere around here...
It is along Dunearn Rd... -
Pls refer to the earlier post in this msg, and u will get the answers to your question above.Originally posted by sBs_boy:Then.. How do you explain about the DDs on 157 ?? -
Not enough people for DDs
-
the following are spotted perm on 48 today:
Duty Code : Rego
1A/10P : 1918Y (V Kool Ad)
2A/11P : 1953U (Ribena Ad)
3A/12P : 1982K (Cathay Pacific "Flies 2 Beijing" Ad)
4A/13P : 1999M
5A/14P : 2674T (Solvil Et Titus Ad)
6A/15P : 2707H
7A/16P : 2748P (Noribox Ad)
8A/17P : 2761A
9A/18P : 2646A (Class 95 Ad)
the service is a fully arbp-controlled service. basically like 93, full arbp & majority striders, except no VO2x but have DM3500 instead. there are 10 buses on tis svc. the one on off today i think is 2787B.
tis svc currently has no S/E/T shifts. per trip is 50 mins, peak up to 60 mins. very rush but good. load for a first day svc is also considered very good. -
So what does this mean?
Time to update Sgbuses Wiki liao. -
MK4 Striders and MK4 DM3500, by ARBP.Originally posted by lemon1974:Anyone taken SV 48 today? what bus model is SV48 using? -
1953U ad is Ribena. 1982K also has ad but I didn't see what the ad is.Originally posted by ^tamago^:the following are spotted perm on 48 today:
Duty Code : Rego
1A/10P : 1918Y
2A/11P : 1953U (Ad)
3A/12P : 1982K
4A/13P : 1999M
5A/14P : 2674T
6A/15P : 2707H
7A/16P : 2748P (Noribox Ad)
8A/17P : 2761A
9A/18P : 2646A (Class 95 Ad) -
SBS1982K is Cathay Pacific "Flies 2 Beijing". CONFIRMED buses are ALL ARBP controlled and are Striders & DM3500. THe buses were previously on feeder svcs with 272,274,275, Bukit Merah Int. Headway quite fast as i recorded max time taken 60mins.Originally posted by tranquilice:1953U ad is Ribena. 1982K also has ad but I didn't see what the ad is. -
SBS1918Y- V KoolOriginally posted by ^tamago^:the following are spotted perm on 48 today:
Duty Code : Rego
1A/10P : 1918Y
2A/11P : 1953U (Ad)
3A/12P : 1982K
4A/13P : 1999M
5A/14P : 2674T
6A/15P : 2707H
7A/16P : 2748P (Noribox Ad)
8A/17P : 2761A
9A/18P : 2646A (Class 95 Ad)
the service is a fully arbp-controlled service. basically like 93, full arbp & majority striders, except no VO2x but have DM3500 instead. there are 10 buses on tis svc. the one on off today i think is 2787B.
tis svc currently has no S/E/T shifts. per trip is 50 mins, peak up to 60 mins. very rush but good. load for a first day svc is also considered very good.
SBS2674T-Solvil Et Titus -
ooh....so da 1999M and 2707H is now ARBP?.. 2707 was an SP bus ryt? 1999 was on 147 and cameo on 111 ryt?....i boarded 48, 1999M, total journey only got 10 ppl exactly including me...Originally posted by Acx1688:SBS1982K is Cathay Pacific "Flies 2 Beijing". CONFIRMED buses are ALL ARBP controlled and are Striders & DM3500. THe buses were previously on feeder svcs with 272,274,275, Bukit Merah Int. Headway quite fast as i recorded max time taken 60mins. -
2707H was BB 156, then SP, then AR 48.Originally posted by muziq bus:ooh....so da 1999M and 2707H is now ARBP?.. 2707 was an SP bus ryt? 1999 was on 147 and cameo on 111 ryt?....i boarded 48, 1999M, total journey only got 10 ppl exactly including me...
1999M was BB 147 until it was replaced by 9889U, then did SP until getting put on AR 48. -
But Jack said a couple of weeks ago that 9889 took over 9245.Originally posted by leeJZ:2707H was BB 156, then SP, then AR 48.
1999M was BB 147 until it was replaced by 9889U, then did SP until getting put on AR 48.
-
Eh, not heavily publicised, some bs along Marine parade Rd [twds UEC] no poster! wait till ev1 finds out...Originally posted by muziq bus:ooh....so da 1999M and 2707H is now ARBP?.. 2707 was an SP bus ryt? 1999 was on 147 and cameo on 111 ryt?....i boarded 48, 1999M, total journey only got 10 ppl exactly including me... -
we welcome our first Mk III spotted on 48, Mr. SBS833P!
as it goes, all Mk III's on 48 are cameos so nothing to be sad about. -
It was already swapped before. Being 854 at the single berth and 608 at the other. 854 have too many buses and therefore the single berth cannot meet the demand.Originally posted by tranquilice:Actually service 608 should swap berth with service 854. Bendies have no problem reversing out of the single berth parking lots.