hope SBST and SMRT can ply the following roads
-
1) Kim Tian Road
- to faciliate residents staying in flats located at innermost area
2) Tagore Lane,
- for workers in Tagore ind estate, walking time from innermost factories to main road (Upp Thomson Rd) is too long
3) Jln Pemimpin
- industrial estates, walking distance to Thomson Road, Bishan St 21 is too long
4) Balmoral Road
- to faciliate residents
Maxwell Road
- only CSS 608 plies this road
5) Defu Industrial Estate
- too long walking distance to Hougang Ave 3
6) Ubi Ave 3
- some services plying Ubi Ave 2 should use this road instead
7) Joo Seng Rd
- too long walking distance to Aljunied Rd, Upp Paya Lebar Rd
Meyer Rd
9) Eunos Crescent
10) Killney Rd
11) Tiong Poh Rd
- to faciliate residents staying in flats located at innermost area
12) Changi Business Park
- no bus serving this big area
13) Woodlands Dr 17
- long walking distance for students studying in Singapore Sports School
14) Woodlands Wafer Fab Park
15) Sungei Kadut Loop
16) Changi Coast Rd
No bus serving Changi Ferry Terminal currently -
Pardon me for saying this, but the students are supposed to exercise more!Originally posted by No_10_Tomas_Rosicky:13) Woodlands Dr 17
- long walking distance for students studying in Singapore Sports School
-
It is not possible to have buses everywhere
Kim Tian Rd, cannot uses 12m buses as of that market stretch... -
Duplicated
-
There should be a route to Meyer Rd.
-
Originally posted by No_10_Tomas_Rosicky:2) Tagore Lane,
- for workers in Tagore ind estate, walking time from innermost factories to main road (Upp Thomson Rd) is too long
agree.. but its mostly warehouses there, and people uses pickups and trucks.. little people movement during the day..
4) Balmoral Road
- to faciliate residents
CSS603?
5) Defu Industrial Estate
- too long walking distance to Hougang Ave 3
sv323 proved ineffective despite it being 30mins freq.. theres TAM rd and HG ave 3.. Meyer Rd
Private Housing Estates, like Serangoon Gardens, Kembangan, Mount Senai. Seletar Hills also no bus..
12) Changi Business Park
- no bus serving this big area
yeah.. agree, unless u includes sv35 serving a small area
13) Woodlands Dr 17
- long walking distance for students studying in Singapore Sports School
sort off.. but i tot have school bus??
14) Woodlands Wafer Fab Park
wheres that?
15) Sungei Kadut Loop
the whole Sungei Kadut Estate only got 925, which dont operates at night and sundays.. need at least a regular service..
16) Changi Coast Rd
No bus serving Changi Ferry Terminal currently. Rich People, all take taxis.. ferry trip was 3hrs/trip.. -
ShunFu Road also needs a bus service.
-
CSS 603 used to ply Balmoral Rd, but the demand along this road plus Chancery Lane was not high afterall.Originally posted by No_10_Tomas_Rosicky:4) Balmoral Road
- to faciliate residents
5) Defu Industrial Estate
- too long walking distance to Hougang Ave 3 Meyer Rd
10) Killney Rd
12) Changi Business Park
- no bus serving this big area
Service 323 used to ply Defu Ave 1 but was withdrawn in February 2002 due to low demand.
Bus Plus 547 ply Meyer Rd.
Some Nite Owl and NR services ply Killiney Rd express to get from River Valley Rd to Somerset Rd.
There are private bus services from Woodlands MRT, Boon Lay MRT, Pasir Ris MRT and Bedok MRT to Changi Business Park, operated by Swift Singapore Pte Ltd. -
What for? There are already so many services in the close vicinity of Shunfu estate.Originally posted by 5454:ShunFu Road also needs a bus service. -
i think it only have one problem: no bus go directly to Bishan MRT. The 410 turn here turn there b4 reaching the interchange, so, is like so near yet so far problem.Originally posted by tranquilice:What for? There are already so many services in the close vicinity of Shunfu estate. -
Well, now you have 58.Originally posted by No_10_Tomas_Rosicky:6) Ubi Ave 3
- some services plying Ubi Ave 2 should use this road instead -
You've got your wish!!Originally posted by No_10_Tomas_Rosicky:6) Ubi Ave 3
- some services plying Ubi Ave 2 should use this road instead -
151 plied Defu Ave 1 when it first came about. Later on, it was amended to ply the whole stretch of HGN Ave 3 to avoid duplicating 323.Originally posted by No_10_Tomas_Rosicky:5) Defu Industrial Estate
- too long walking distance to Hougang Ave 3 -
Maybe can reverse the route for Sv 151 to serve the Defu Ind area?Originally posted by iveco:151 plied Defu Ave 1 when it first came about. Later on, it was amended to ply the whole stretch of HGN Ave 3 to avoid duplicating 323. -
Currently 151 is duplicating with 87 from Hougang Ave 3 until Hougang Central.Originally posted by gorby107:Maybe can reverse the route for Sv 151 to serve the Defu Ind area?
51 also duplicate with them on the Hougang Ave 3 stretch. -
hmm.. and i thought sv151 was HG ave 3 all the way? still, sv151 cant be amended to defu ave 1 as there is heavy loads from HG ave 3 onwards in the mornings especially. the bus is already full once it reached 3rd stop of Hg ave 3.. sad SBS neglects it..Originally posted by iveco:151 plied Defu Ave 1 when it first came about. Later on, it was amended to ply the whole stretch of HGN Ave 3 to avoid duplicating 323. -
Originally posted by PJ_Quek:Currently 151 is duplicating with 87 from Hougang Ave 3 until Hougang Central.
51 also duplicate with them on the Hougang Ave 3 stretch. -
Service 115 to cover?
-
Maybe also can serve from the hougang south Int like former Sv 323 but later low ridership and withdraw or amend it againOriginally posted by SBS9889U:Service 115 to cover? -
There's service 54. Marymount Rd is not that far away.Originally posted by disappear:i think it only have one problem: no bus go directly to Bishan MRT. The 410 turn here turn there b4 reaching the interchange, so, is like so near yet so far problem. -
Service 151 does not ply the whole stretch of Hougang Ave 3.Originally posted by iveco:151 plied Defu Ave 1 when it first came about. Later on, it was amended to ply the whole stretch of HGN Ave 3 to avoid duplicating 323. -
No, it ply Defu Ave 1 and did not enter Kent Ridge Cres in its early days.Originally posted by 105090:hmm.. and i thought sv151 was HG ave 3 all the way? -
More than a decade ago, there was the old service SBS 59 (Bishan-Jalan Kayu) which took a direct route from Marymount to Bishan (via Jalan Peminpin). No Junction 8 then. No RI/RJC. No Bishan 8 condos. And the present SBST 410 route was served by the old SBS 57.Originally posted by disappear:i think it only have one problem: no bus go directly to Bishan MRT. The 410 turn here turn there b4 reaching the interchange, so, is like so near yet so far problem.
-
Since when ex-service 59 ply Jln Pemimpin?!Originally posted by NineGrains:More than a decade ago, there was the old service SBS 59 (Bishan-Jalan Kayu) which took a direct route from Marymount to Bishan (via Jalan Peminpin). No Junction 8 then. No RI/RJC. No Bishan 8 condos. And the present SBST 410 route was served by the old SBS 57. 
-
Hmm... Any reason why admemded into NUS? Is it because of the demand?Originally posted by tranquilice:No, it ply Defu Ave 1 and did not enter Kent Ridge Cres in its early days.