Their so-called 'stringent' security checks i observe to be not much more than a big load of hot air for show purposes ! Good disguise for 'intentional inefficientcy' that's really about it !! So that some people here get their needed doses of 'superior security' here.
If one were to observe the design of the checkpoint complex & the roads leading into & out from it, much indeed can & ought to be done to improve on them to increase traffic discharge efficientcy (they can perhaps get some hints from the giant size new Johor complex coming up just next door !) while maintainng whatever perceived existing levels of 'stringent security checks' !
They don't need to cramp all cars, buses, trucks into just a few narrow discharge lanes before 'releasing' them onto the highways here ! Are they trying to say that they only have 'so few' manpower available to perform security duty that only these few men/women can do the job that that's why they 'need' to squeeze everybody thru the stupid bottlenecks ?!??
They really have 'no money' to hire more security staff, open more counters, build more lanes etc. to do all the necessary to not only maintain security but ALSO to improve both human & vehicular traffic discharge efficiencies ?!??
I most honestly cannot believe that ! Surely they cannot just rely on just those 'few' exisiting security staff to man the thousands of people & vehicles passing in/out daily ! They can perhaps learn something from the wide spread out concept used in the Malaysian toll booths e.g. of spreading out the traffic such that everybody is still 'inspected upon' before being 'passed' to go i.e. nobody 'escapes' paying their tolls & what not ? Surely it cannot mean that you must have just 2 or 3 narrow lanes then the security is 'good' else with many more lanes the security 'drops' ?!?? That's nonsense logic because it's not asking the existing few staff to mann many more lanes BUT to hire more new personnel to mann the increased lanes instead ! The nett result in security levels is practically the same except that more can be processed in the same time ! Surely the Singapore Government is rich & competent enough to acquire more such personnel to do the jobs ! No funds is certainly no excuse here, if that's what they thinking of saying !!!! No land here to build more spread out lanes they can resort to building more multi-storey lanes instead. No excuses !
It's only money involved, something they are well rich enough to afford !!
Whatever those few security men/women are now doing surely they can produce more such personnel thru more hiring & training etc. such that each & everyone of them can produce the same standard of work output WITHOUT compromising in overall security 'stringentness' !
The end result then is that whatever exisiting security levels are maintained if not enhanced AND the same time improving on the human & vehicular processing discharge rates hence processing efficientcies thru their complex.
I don't think they need to wait for the new giant size Johor complex to set the standard before learning from them ! Singapore is supposed to be more 'advanced' & 'efficient' etc.
Originally posted by Apex-LW'21:
SG side has stringent security checks.