err.. i dont have any preference of bus seats. but i have a preference of seat configuration!Originally posted by gorby107:Which type of bus seats do you all prefer??? Is it the SMRT or SBST one??? The Mk3 seat? Merz Volgren seat??? and so on......... Tell us now
I prefer SBST seats as a whole as it is more comfortable and not so itchy and dusty like the SMRT one which is made of fur. I prefer the seat of SMRT Merz Volgren and the Mk3 seat as they are comfortable to me![]()
huh? but all B10Ms have engine in middle, so seats can only be on same level. Except Mk II where seats also rise at back.Originally posted by sinicker:err.. i dont have any preference of bus seats. but i have a preference of seat configuration!
for SDs and Bendies, i prefer seat configurations where the front is lower and the height of the seats increases to the back such as the SMRT Bendies, SBST Merc/Scania buses. this type of seat configurations makes the bus look spacious and "clean". the MK3s can make it to this list lah. alright lah.
seat configurations that i dislike are like those where the seats are all on the same level. such would be the MK4 DMs, Striders and DM3500s.
the DDs' seat configuration quite okay lah. except that for the lower deck, on the seats running along the window, people just tend to take 2 seats for their own self.
I think the seats on the CRB are also on the same level.Originally posted by CSS302T:huh? but all B10Ms have engine in middle, so seats can only be on same level. Except Mk II where seats also rise at back.
for the B10Ms MK3, the seats rise on the back axle. i like.Originally posted by CSS302T:huh? but all B10Ms have engine in middle, so seats can only be on same level. Except Mk II where seats also rise at back.
CRBs are simmilar to SBST O405.Originally posted by iveco:I think the seats on the CRB are also on the same level.
well i take em everyday for 1 hr per trip....im jus used to it....anyway....the legroom of SMRTB MBO405 is so far the best...no matter where u sit(except the 1 behind the SC cabin), u can stretch ur leg(at least for mi)Originally posted by sErviCe17rOx:N113s and CAC MKIIs have the least legroom AFAIK..from sec 1 till now i have gradually grown out of the legroom of 17s N113s..grrr..
i feel that SMRTB have made the wrong choice in choosing Vogelsitze..they might as well buy plastic chairs to fix on to their buses..its so hard that when u sit on them for long ur blood circulation may get cut off..
nope...i disagree...i take DAF all the time on 985...Originally posted by SBS1908B:I've only taken DAFs twice when they cameoed on 911 in 1996 or 97, and I must say the leg-room is small at the back.
Ya, i agree with you those seats on CSS DAFs are very hard. It would be very uncomfortable if you are going on a long ride.Originally posted by iveco:The seats on the current SMRT buses are fine wuith me. However, for some reason, those on the CSS DAFs are extremely hard.