48 some buses have the back ads like SBS 2707(not sure). Anyway, off peak also dun have 0 pax on ECP. My frien evrydae take Sv48 and say he have to crowd with those students of schools that Sv48 serve.Originally posted by busmanic:yah! svc 48 had those ads
since i live at Selegie i had observe and had these results -
ridership during...Peak Hours between 20-35 people
Off-Peak Hours between 0-20 people
R u sure? Off peak like Saturday or Sunday and even normal times and i can see 10+ pax on Sv58.Originally posted by muziq bus:57? Useless....what about 58? barely surviving....passenger volume not even a double digit on off peak hours..
to me svc 48 like school busOriginally posted by SBS9889U:48 some buses have the back ads like SBS 2707(not sure). Anyway, off peak also dun have 0 pax on ECP. My frien evrydae take Sv48 and say he have to crowd with those students of schools that Sv48 serve.
302 = Serves only the St 52 , North 7 and CCK Cres that partOriginally posted by 105090:of course la.. without 302, 307, thats it for Yew Tee residents! its like crippled if yew tee only has MRT and nothing else.
You all know that many "SMRT" areas only has 1 bus serving large portions of the estate. Example is 302, and 307. So of course, that one bus is which everybody has to take to leave the estate or to MRT station.
Its kind of wierd that there are no other passing through trunk services to/from Yew Tee (besides NR), as buses can pass from CCK to Yew Tee, to Sungei Kadut etc..
Same goes for large parts of Woodlands
it should be 131B if svc 275 is being withdraw as 131A is being usedOriginally posted by sbst275:With regards to Sv 275's immiment withdraw, I dun think a 131A is needed as 131 serves Bt Pumei in both direction
thats why i said..Originally posted by Volvo Olympian:302 = Serves only the St 52 , North 7 and CCK Cres that part
307 = Serves only the North 5 , 6 , St 62 and Teck Whye areas
Sv 48 at least have a little demand pattern during morning when ppl go to school or sometimes work.Originally posted by sbst275:I believe Sv 48 and 57 have something in common - Unstable demand pattern
Hmm...i think u need to paste the full link..Originally posted by busmanic:
Originally posted by sinicker:i cant see leh.
Hmm...i think u need to paste the full link..ok this is it BELOW
yeah...maybe they should make a service...Woodlands to CCK via Yew Tee or something like that?Originally posted by 105090:thats why i said..
besides 302 and 307 and NR, what other svcs goes to St 52 , North 7 and CCK Cres, North 5 , 6 , St 62 and Teck Whye areas?
its NONE!
Originally posted by busmanic:u cant link to ur hard disk lah. use a picture hosting website.
ok this is it [b]BELOW[/b]
Don't be overreactive...Originally posted by 105090:thats why i said..
besides 302 and 307 and NR, what other svcs goes to St 52 , North 7 and CCK Cres, North 5 , 6 , St 62 and Teck Whye areas?
its NONE!
Yeah , such as CCK St 51 and CCK St 54 and so on.Originally posted by brotherchen1982:Don't be overreactive...as some developing & developed towns has no feeders along the streets or have to walk a distance to main rd to take feeder/trunk svc to Int or other places..
By the way, Teck Whye Ave, Teck Whye Rd got 190, 975, 985![]()
Rechecked the PTC Annual Report...Originally posted by busmanic:it should be 131B if svc 275 is being withdraw as 131A is being used![]()
Apex, dat's not funny. Are u sure about it? Stop joking here.Originally posted by Apex-LW'21:There is also Sv 114 (Hougang Depot-Hougang St 21), same as Sv 323.![]()