NEW (going to be introduce) service 114
-
svc 114 plying between HGBP and Hougang St. 21
does anyone know the route of this svc? -
Defu Ave 1
the revival of Sv 323????? -
the PTC withdrawn it and now want it back? cannot beOriginally posted by Edgar_Davids:Defu Ave 1
the revival of Sv 323????? -
hougang ah...ok i'm not involved
-
I hope this is not true, it's like the Citybuzz ... throwing $$$ down the drain. I think maybe to make it feasible, extend it to the nearby Paya Lebar Airport?
-
thats wer busmanic livesOriginally posted by my@jas:I hope this is not true, it's like the Citybuzz ... throwing $$$ down the drain. I think maybe to make it feasible, extend it to the nearby Paya Lebar Airport? -
Originally posted by busmanic:
Where did you get the info from.
svc 114 plying between [b]HGBP and Hougang St. 21
does anyone know the route of this svc?[/b]
-
109 lah. 114 lah.
just wait lah. no need crack ur brains and think so hard when the bus will come out, what buses they'll use. -
got it from the PTC Annual Report 04/05 in the Jurong Regional Library. It also say the withdrawing of svc 275 - because of the extention of svc 131 to Bt PurmeiOriginally posted by 5454:Where did you get the info from. -
read the PTC Annual Report 03/04 say they rejected the SBST's proposed svc 109 and 110 cause they duplicate some other svcOriginally posted by sinicker:109 lah. 114 lah.
just wait lah. no need crack ur brains and think so hard when the bus will come out, what buses they'll use. -
cant wait for the PTC Annual report 05/06 BTW svc 114 was approved by PTC since June or July or September? 2004
-
Go National Library & wait for it to come out loh...Originally posted by busmanic:cant wait for the PTC Annual report 05/06 BTW svc 114 was approved by PTC since June or July or September? 2004
-
might as well extend 115 to hgdep and make a loop service out of it....
-
July 2004.Originally posted by busmanic:cant wait for the PTC Annual report 05/06 BTW svc 114 was approved by PTC since June or July or September? 2004 -
For Sv 109 & 110, it does not generate significant benefits to passengers, other than duplication.Originally posted by busmanic:read the PTC Annual Report 03/04 say they rejected the SBST's proposed svc 109 and 110 cause they duplicate some other svc
There are some other services to be amended like 62, 80, etc but were rejected due to PTC's reasons. -
What I heard was Sv 115 is Sv 114.... some modifications done to Sv 114, and hence the existing Sv 115. What's more, Sv 114 doesn't sound auspicious to the elderly.
-
no lah... i dun think sbs now got superstitious... thats why dey intro 43, 48(maybe the 8 counter the death of 4)Originally posted by SBS9816E:What I heard was Sv 115 is Sv 114.... some modifications done to Sv 114, and hence the existing Sv 115. What's more, Sv 114 doesn't sound auspicious to the elderly. -
What about the revival of 34?Originally posted by SBS9828X:no lah... i dun think sbs now got superstitious... thats why dey intro 43, 48(maybe the 8 counter the death of 4) -
....Originally posted by iveco:What about the revival of 34? -
haha you can expect the unexpected...... 323 was the exact replicate of 329 which was withdrawn due to poor ridership......but then again, that time no PTC :pOriginally posted by busmanic:the PTC withdrawn it and now want it back? cannot be -
the life of svc 34 is meant to be an airport routeOriginally posted by iveco:What about the revival of 34?
Bedok to CGA
PGL to CGA - I kinda a bit the hate this route ply a little bit of Punggol why not just extend svc 27 (from Punggol Rd, Punggol Field Rd, Punggol Place, Punggol Rd, then back to old route TPE...) to ply that part of svc 34
BTW puggol have damn weird rd names e.g. Edgefield Plain- there's two of it! one which is serve by svc 136 and the other not serve by anything -
I remember 323 used to ply HGN Ave 7 (an area won by WP in 1991 & retained till now). In the 1992 rationalisation, it was amended and left only 327 plying Neighbourhood 3. Many of LTK's constituents were mad. Similar things happened in Potong Pasir as well.Originally posted by bendy2003:haha you can expect the unexpected...... 323 was the exact replicate of 329 which was withdrawn due to poor ridership......but then again, that time no PTC :p -
like the WP they want votes wat so they are going too add a new bus-stop in Potong Pasir maybe svc 114 is introduce between SBST and WP and the PAP want ppl's votes so open Buangkok MRT Station
-
er, the road within Punggol without any bus stop currently is Edgedale Plains not Edgefield Plains. Edgedale used to have 2 temporary bus stops when Pgl int was not up yet.
-
thanks for that infoOriginally posted by kuekj:er, the road within Punggol without any bus stop currently is Edgedale Plains not Edgefield Plains. Edgedale used to have 2 temporary bus stops when Pgl int was not up yet.