NEW (going to be introduce) service 114

• hseochin

  30 Jan 06, 14:02

  '114' means 'everyday die' i.e. not a very 'good' service # !
  Perhaps to ensure more success they should use another #.
• Edgar_Davids

  30 Jan 06, 16:32

  haha so many svcs ending with 4
  
  14, 24, 34, 54, 64, 74, 94, 124, 154, 174, 194, 254, 274, 284, 334, 354, 804, 854, 964
• Volvo Olympian

  30 Jan 06, 16:39

  Originally posted by Edgar_Davids:

  haha so many svcs ending with 4
  
  14, 24, 34, 54, 64, 74, 94, 124, 154, 174, 194, 254, 274, 284, 334, 354, 804, 854, 964

  you forgot Sv 184
• busmanic

  30 Jan 06, 17:33

  Originally posted by Edgar_Davids:

  haha so many svcs ending with 4
  
  14, 24, 34, 54, 64, 74, 94, 124, 154, 174, 194, 254, 274, 284, 334, 354, 804, 854, 964

  plus going to start svc 114
• SBS9889U

  30 Jan 06, 19:30

  Originally posted by busmanic:

  plus going to start svc 114

  I wonder if there would be Service 44.
• 105090

  30 Jan 06, 23:44

  Originally posted by hseochin:

  '114' means 'everyday die' i.e. not a very 'good' service # !
  Perhaps to ensure more success they should use another #.

  how does it sound like everyday die?
  
  isnt it starve starve to death?
• stooper

  30 Jan 06, 23:48

  Originally posted by 105090:

  how does it sound like everyday die?
  
  isnt it starve starve to death?

  it does in Cantonese...
• gohby

  31 Jan 06, 12:21

  Originally posted by busmanic:

  plus going to start svc 114

  Originally posted by SBS9816E:

  What I heard was Sv 115 is Sv 114.... some modifications done to Sv 114, and hence the existing Sv 115. What's more, Sv 114 doesn't sound auspicious to the elderly.

  That rebuts your point.
• ^tamago^

  31 Jan 06, 13:04

  Originally posted by 105090:

  how does it sound like everyday die?
  
  isnt it starve starve to death?

  yao yao si.
• brotherchen1982

  31 Jan 06, 13:39

  Originally posted by busmanic:

  plus going to start svc 114

  Originally posted by ^tamago^:

  yao yao si.

  Luckily Hougang Ctrl Int retain feeder 325...
• kenny_cai

  1 Feb 06, 11:58

  Originally posted by Apex-LW'21:

  For Sv 109 & 110, it does not generate significant benefits to passengers, other than duplication.
  
  There are some other services to be amended like 62, 80, etc but were rejected due to PTC's reasons.

  You have any info on the 2 mentioned services? Maybe some light can be shed on these "rejected" services.
• Apex-LW'21

  1 Feb 06, 16:22

  - Deleted. -
• busmanic

  1 Feb 06, 21:21

  Originally posted by busmanic:

  read the PTC Annual Report 03/04 say they rejected the SBST's proposed svc 109 and 110 cause they duplicate some other svc

  and last year they rejected some of SBST's Xpress services plying between Hougang and Ang Mo Kio to the CBD area
• ^tamago^

  1 Feb 06, 21:29

  really, i think this is old news. we have heard of it long ago about 109, 110 and 114.
  
  114 is the present day 115.
• brotherchen1982

  2 Feb 06, 18:30

  Originally posted by kenny_cai:

  You have any info on the 2 mentioned services? Maybe some light can be shed on these "rejected" services.

  REJECTED BY PTC
  62 & 80 : Change to cut back svc(It does not generate significant benefits to passengers)
  76 & 93 : Divert to Serangoon Stn(It does not generate significant benefits to passengers)
  100 : Divert to Depot Rd(It does not generate significant benefits to passengers)
  155 : Divert to Upp Serangoon Rd(Turning costraint at junction of Upp Serangoon Rd & Upp Aljunied Rd)
  Express 570 : Duplication of existing Express svc.
• Apex-LW'21

  2 Feb 06, 18:32

  BTW, thanks for the info from you, brotherchen1982, because I can't have time to look up for those svcs that are rejected by PTC.