Will sv 106 gets re-numbered?
-
As you can see, all services nos. that starts with 10* except 106 starts from Serangoon (except 107 which starts from Hougang Central but still Northeast side)
Although 106 used to ply between Serangoon n Bukit Batok but now this service never ply the Northeast area anymore so will it kenna renumbered by SMRT? -
think so much for wat? dat means 51 also kenna chg lah?
-
not so soon. maybe, maybe, it might be renumbered as 846.
-
den 67 leh?
77 leh?
61 leh?
oso get re-numbered???
the possibility nt high... -
it may get renumbered if enhancements are made to the route.
-
Or maybe 986.Originally posted by ^tamago^:not so soon. maybe, maybe, it might be renumbered as 846. -
oo...u got insider info ah?? or just guessin?Originally posted by ^tamago^:not so soon. maybe, maybe, it might be renumbered as 846.
haha...i noe apex jus guessin la -
There's actually some water in his guess (if you get what I mean). There's already the strangely-numbered route 985 from nearby Choa Chu Kang, and feeder routes in Bukit Batok have already been renumbered into the 94- series. I don't see why they won't use the number 986 if a renumbering excersise takes place.Originally posted by muziq bus:oo...u got insider info ah?? or just guessin?
haha...i noe apex jus guessin la
Oddly, feeder routes in Choa Chu Kang retain their 300-series designation to this day, when you could have expected A$$MRT to make them in the 800s or 900s. Also, notice how the old route 181 became 961 (to fit it into the other Woodlands trunk routes), while nothing was done to routes 169, 178, and 858? -
I am very unsure whether 173, 177, 189 will also be re-numbered.
-
Quite strange for Choa Chu Kang Feeders ... still using 30x .... the rest all use 80x , 81x , 90x , 91x , 92x and 94x.Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:There's actually some water in his guess (if you get what I mean). There's already the strangely-numbered route 985 from nearby Choa Chu Kang, and feeder routes in Bukit Batok have already been renumbered into the 94- series. I don't see why they won't use the number 986 if a renumbering excersise takes place.
Oddly, feeder routes in Choa Chu Kang retain their 300-series designation to this day, when you could have expected A$$MRT to make them in the 800s or 900s. Also, notice how the old route 181 became 961 (to fit it into the other Woodlands trunk routes), while nothing was done to routes 169, 178, and 858?
Who knows , in future CCK Feeders might be using 93x
, hehe , im just guessing BTW -
right.....now all these speculations are getting dumber and illogical by the moment....
-
true.. but yah.. i dont deny it may change if SMRT plans to do some "enhancement" to the route.
-
985 is the intergration of 185 & 989, TIBS/SMRTB want the intergrated svc number involves with part of 185 & 989...Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:There's already the strangely-numbered route 985 from nearby Choa Chu Kang.
Then what you expect the intergration of 185 & 989 to become???
Do you notice two 98x series terminate at Geylang Lor 1 Ter while 981 terminates at Sembawang??? -
y not rename as 999....
-
Think TIBS/SMRTB want the intergrated svc number involves with part of 185 & 989...Originally posted by ddrdm_boiiboii:y not rename as 999.... -
Confirmed true....Originally posted by brotherchen1982:Think TIBS/SMRTB want the intergrated svc number involves with part of 185 & 989...
and if SMRT had the intentions to renuber their services, then SMRT would have renumbered their Sembawang services already... -
985 is probably formed by taking the first no in 989 and the last two in 185. That is what I thought.
-
ha if they renumber my sv.106 guides will not be produced anymore
-
Whats next? "Will Sv 61/75/173/176/177/189 get renumbered?"
-
okay... My Point of View..
- From what i see, as we all know, these few services were took over by TIBS from SBS in the past due to various reasons. What i feel is that in order nt to confuse our dear passengers who used these "Affected" services, SMRTB will not renumber them as long as there are no route changes being made... -
renumber for what???
waste tme and money then they say not profitable and then increase fare again -
must u still harp on the fare issue... SMRT was not the only one who increased their fares...Originally posted by hisoka:renumber for what???
waste tme and money then they say not profitable and then increase fare again -
I think SMRT should also renumber some bus routes in Sembawang Int eg: 980 becomes 880, 981 becomes 881, 167 becomes 887, all the 88x series from Sembawang. It is weird tat got 980, 981 then 882......
-
last time me used to take 106 to orchard...
-
Also wanna add on......Yishun should renumber 171 to 850, Woodlands should renumber 178 to 968, 187 to 967, 964 should convert into a feeder service and rename 904. Bt Panjang on the other hand should renumber 176 to 976, 177 to 977, and 75 to maybe 971 to complete the 97x series...Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:There's actually some water in his guess (if you get what I mean). There's already the strangely-numbered route 985 from nearby Choa Chu Kang, and feeder routes in Bukit Batok have already been renumbered into the 94- series. I don't see why they won't use the number 986 if a renumbering excersise takes place.
Oddly, feeder routes in Choa Chu Kang retain their 300-series designation to this day, when you could have expected A$$MRT to make them in the 800s or 900s. Also, notice how the old route 181 became 961 (to fit it into the other Woodlands trunk routes), while nothing was done to routes 169, 178, and 858?