Is it worse or better?Originally posted by muziq bus:the interval of 10 mins has been ignored lately
Its better...less than 10 mins..Originally posted by stooper:Is it worse or better?
Don't have.Originally posted by SBS9889U:Does it have Sv guides?
Seriously.. you have a serious Attitude problem from what i see...Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:...
...
...
I'm at a loss for words...
Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:...
...
...
Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:what has walking gota do with wasting $$?
[b]
You say route 68 is dumb. TRY TELLING THIS S••T TO THOSE PEOPLE WORKING AT THE INDUSTRIAL AREA AT TAMPINES ST 92!!! YOU REALLY LOVE WANTING TO SEE PEOPLE SPENDING MORE ON TIME AND MONEY TO WALK, RIGHT?
[b]
Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:I wonder if you do your homework before complaining.
[b]...
...
...
Let me tell you what I find wrong with A$$-M-MATI:
• Wasteful - spending thousands of dollars on totally illegible EDSes that spoil easily when cheap plastic plates, like what SBS Transit use on almost all of their buses, could have served their purpose. And they actually spent money on those completely dumb pink uniforms (pink for men - YUCK!) and to make their disgusting new livery (described as blood + bird poop by some foreigners in a chat room when I described to them the colours used) as high-quality as possible on those rotten buses (look carefully!), and to buy those PINIFARINA-designed, beautifully useless buses...
• Cheap (but not on the fares side, unfournately) - to get more buses, they got all but one route of their extremely useful C$$ routes withdrawn, and then get those dirty, creaky, old, sweaty, cramped, and completely ROTTEN buses to toture those living in Sembawang (routes 167, 980, 981), Woodlands (routes 178, 187), Bukit Panjang (routes 920, 921), and Yishun (routes 851, 852, 853, 855), while they pay AIR-CON fares for NON-AIR-CON buses to keep up their image (FULL FLEET OF AIR-CON BUSES!!! By the way they collect fares, it is...) (at least SBS Transit charge non air-con fares when you take a non air-con bus...). And the way they convert non air-conditioned buses to air-conditioned buses is:
He may just use a public computer to do it BUT hopefully he dont put down buses.sgforums.com in anywhere of his post.Originally posted by muziq bus:If u dare, right in to SMRT and use the label A$$-M-Mati lah..
WoodlandsOriginally posted by eX.A.K.R.:Cheap (but not on the fares side, unfournately) - to get more buses, they got all but one route of their extremely useful C$$ routes withdrawn, and then get those dirty, creaky, old, sweaty, cramped, and completely ROTTEN buses to toture those living in Sembawang (routes 167, 980, 981), Woodlands (routes 178, 187), Bukit Panjang (routes 920, 921), and Yishun (routes 851, 852, 853, 855), while they pay AIR-CON fares for NON-AIR-CON buses to keep up their image (FULL FLEET OF AIR-CON BUSES!!! By the way they collect fares, it is...) (at least SBS Transit charge non air-con fares when you take a non air-con bus...). And the way they convert non air-conditioned buses to air-conditioned buses is:
Originally posted by TIB1018B:Very Sorry.. 853's TIB377X and TIB365E are Perm..
[
853 - have one original Nissan on one of the S-Shifts (TIB377X), do have a number of other Nissan cameos quite often too. Also considered as one of the worst service from AMK, however as compared to WL 178 it is still a better SMRT service[/b]
Thanx for a proper compilation and matured comments.Originally posted by TIB1018B:Woodlands
178 - the most number of Nissan Buses deployed including weekends. In fact this is the worst SMRT service in Singapore
187 - at least have mixture of modern bendy buses and a number of Nissan cameos appearing very frequently. Service not very good too
Bt Panjang
920 - no longer uses Nissan cameos, now revert to original buses (TIB541M, TIB725A and TIB967T). Service standard improved
921 - now using Bus Plus. Service standard improved
|
|
|
853 - have one original Nissan on one of the S-Shifts (TIB377X), do have a number of other Nissan cameos quite often too. Also considered as one of the worst service from AMK, however as compared to WL 178 it is still a better SMRT service![]()
wow.. i admire your statementsOriginally posted by muziq bus:"Cekik darah betul anak jubur ini.."
.
.
.
Then might as well replace it with Bus Plus and increase the frequency?Originally posted by muziq bus:178 deserves it...
tried so many times. Demand not that impressive anyway.
Its too precious to be withdrawn, so its using Nissans instead.
Nice one. Wa caya sama lu.Originally posted by muziq bus:Most men suffer from colour deppreciation...
i think ur one of them...
its not PINK...
its pale purple in colour..
U complain when SMRT deploys Nissan...the ugly old bus.
When SMRT deploy habit...the most expensive yet elegant bus...
u also complain. What logic is this?
waited one hour for a bus?
sheer exaggeration...even if there was, remember heavy traffic near little india for 67.
"Kamu akan ditimpa kemalangan dengan sebuah bas dan bodek lu akan gugur"
PS: U didnt took english? Where'z your paragraphs? PPL cant be bothered to read whatever rotten shit you posted.
Yea...this sentence i agree with you fully. BusPlus would be good. Just that many of them would be required.Originally posted by stooper:Then might as well replace it with Bus Plus and increase the frequency?
Sometimes, I think increasing the frequency will improve the demand... E.g. at Jurong East, 198 comes much more frequent than 178 to BNL... so I almost always take 198 although 178 is faster by about 5min... But waiting time is already 20min...
Same at BB... Sometimes, if I want quick sleep, I will take 178 or 157 to BNL... But 178 frequency is just too long...