I'd rather let SBST extend service 35 to Changi Naval base as there's no public bus serving there nowOriginally posted by TWS4793:This is another idea of a bus route I've been thinking of. Previously Changi Coast Road is quite deserted, with possibly some aviation fans going there to spot planes and some taking pictures of planes. Most of the planes will take-off from runway 02R if they're heading North, runway 20L for landing. It's quite troublesome to walk such a long distance for the aviation fans, especially since some of them might want to spot the new Airbus A380 in Singapore. This has been created in mind of those yearning to spot planes but do not want to waste their energy walking for long distances (like me). What do you think?
Service 35 (Extended) - Bedok Interchange to Changi Ferry Terminal
I think we should either write to PTC or SMRT / SBST to intro such services , i've written to them already. Hope that it will be introduced , but i wonder will this service be under SBST or SMRT?Originally posted by patdog112:i will dream for tat to happen.. finally a bus to connect me to suntec direct..but if cck way turn into teckwhye better can lessen 190 loads of students
Unfortunately, some people (like me) are lone rangers. If anyone of you have seen me doing bus spotting, it is all done alone.Originally posted by sinicker:i believe most aviation fans would have their own transport or hitch a ride with their other aviation fan friends. no need for public buses running down changi coastal road.
This should improve the accessibillity between the residents of Woodlands, Tampines, Bedok, Chai Chee and Eunos. But I think we had a Service 966 plying some parts of Eunos.Originally posted by musli_bar:What about extending SBST 168 to Eunos Int viaNormal route from Woodlands to Bedok North Ave 3
Bedok North Street 1
Chai Chee St
Chai Chee Dr
Changi Rd
Jln Turi
Eunos Rd 2
Eunos Int
what some parts? Only Jln Eunos.Originally posted by TWS4793:This should improve the accessibillity between the residents of Woodlands, Tampines, Bedok, Chai Chee and Eunos. But I think we had a Service 966 plying some parts of Eunos.
But currently eunos MRT/Int there dont have any bus that goes to Simei but 168 no need to extend to eunos coz theres 966 which is much fasterOriginally posted by service_238:what some parts? Only Jln Eunos.
As for S168 extension to Eunos there's alot of red tape that needs to be cleared. S9 shouldnt be a problem. But if its extended to Eunos means it'll be under brbp...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
then you gotta cycle there.Originally posted by TWS4793:Unfortunately, some people (like me) are lone rangers. If anyone of you have seen me doing bus spotting, it is all done alone.
The total distance of runway 02C/20C is 4 km long. Those who come taking public transport surely would want a better way of being transported around.
what will be the frequency of this service? how many passengers will there be? only One?Originally posted by TWS4793:Unfortunately, some people (like me) are lone rangers. If anyone of you have seen me doing bus spotting, it is all done alone.
The total distance of runway 02C/20C is 4 km long. Those who come taking public transport surely would want a better way of being transported around.
Well, that scenario seems rather likely. THere is 131 serving the same purpose.Originally posted by carbikebus:Suggest that service 275 to be withdrawn,So useless and lone ranger somemore![]()
168 cannot. 9 & 35 maybe possible.Originally posted by service_238:what some parts? Only Jln Eunos.
As for S168 extension to Eunos there's alot of red tape that needs to be cleared. S9 shouldnt be a problem. But if its extended to Eunos means it'll be under brbp...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sv275 withdrawal lapsed, need to reapply to PTC.Originally posted by iveco:Well, that scenario seems rather likely. THere is 131 serving the same purpose.
who knows they might shorten 131 to loop @ bukit purmei avenue while keeping sv 275 (with better frequency)Originally posted by carbikebus:Suggest that service 275 to be withdrawn,So useless and lone ranger somemore![]()
If that is the case, 123 can be extended to HBF via former 85 route and give Bt Purmei a miss altogether.Originally posted by Kheng Peng:who knows they might shorten 131 to loop @ bukit purmei avenue while keeping sv 275 (with better frequency)![]()
![]()
Those ppl in Bt Purmei needs 123 to bring them to Tiong Bahru MRT as I have noticed that during peak hours between Tiong Bahru MRT and Bt Purmei Avenue 123 seems to have a heavy load........Originally posted by iveco:If that is the case, 123 can be extended to HBF via former 85 route and give Bt Purmei a miss altogether.
But HBF MRT is much nearer. That is the reason for 131 to enter Bt Purmei estate.Originally posted by toll123:Those ppl in Bt Purmei needs 123 to bring them to Tiong Bahru MRT as I have noticed that during peak hours between Tikong Bahru MRT and Bt Purmei Avenue 123 seems to have a heavy load........
Maybe 131 is to provide a link for Bt purmei residents to take the North East line while 123 is for those who wants to take the East West line?Originally posted by iveco:But HBF MRT is much nearer. That is the reason for 131 to enter Bt Purmei estate.
I still think that stretch of road is better served by 855 'cos it is a shorter route. 131 uses Tk Blangah Way and Henderson Rd to reach HBF.
Try writing to PTC about this , they might agree.Originally posted by iveco:If that is the case, 123 can be extended to HBF via former 85 route and give Bt Purmei a miss altogether.
There are already some buses going towards Orchard Rd along Lr Delta Rd and Kg Bahru Rd. It is just a short walk from the flats.
855 can also deviate inside the housing estate and provide a more direct link with HBF MRT.
Cannot laOriginally posted by Kheng Peng:actually for sv 9 and 35, maybe they can merge with sv 60?