Originally posted by I miss old annoucements:
To serve the majority who will be alighting before CGA, just like 27A
Have you seen 27A use DDs?
Originally posted by Oceane:
Have you seen 27A use DDs?
No, but there was someone who suggested for 27A to use DD and I think it is good.
Originally posted by I miss old annoucements:Does anyone think 168 should be an express service? It runs through the highway to woodlands and therefore, so few stops from Bedok to Woodlands.
I assume you have yet to see the high loads on 168 and 161...
Originally posted by I miss old annoucements:
If it will not enter the tunnel, why can't DDs be used? anyway, what do you think of CGA? Non friendly to DD, K230UB bumper, worse still bendies also cannot.
Sorry it's underground, so too bad.
Express 510 (fleet: Volvo MKIV Strider/DM3500)
Bedok INT
New Upper Changi Road
Upper Changi Road East
Simei Ave
Tampines Ave 5
Tampines Ave 4
Tampines St 41
Tampines Ave 9
Tampines Ave 12
Pasir Ris DR 8
Pasir Ris DR 1
Elias Road
[Tampaines Expressway]
Pungol Road
Pungol Ctrl
Pungol Way
Sengkang East Road
Sengkang East Way
JLN Kayu
[tampanies Expressway]
[Seletar Expressway]
Woodland Ave 3
Woodland Rd
Choa Chu Kang North 6
Choa Chu Kang INT
Originally posted by I miss old annoucements:Express 510 (fleet: Volvo MKIV Strider/DM3500)
Bedok INT
New Upper Changi Road
Upper Changi Road East
Simei Ave
Tampines Ave 5
Tampines Ave 4
Tampines St 41
Tampines Ave 9
Tampines Ave 12
Pasir Ris DR 8
Pasir Ris DR 1
Elias Road
[Tampaines Expressway]
Pungol Road
Pungol Ctrl
Pungol Way
Sengkang East Road
Sengkang East Way
JLN Kayu
[tampanies Expressway]
[Seletar Expressway]
... ...
Woodland Ave 3
Woodland Rd
Choa Chu Kang North 6
... ...
Choa Chu Kang INT
how r u going to ply this two parts? thru Stagmont Ring? not feasible. plus there is some missing routes...how abt the other direction?
Originally posted by nenepokey:how r u going to ply this two parts? thru Stagmont Ring? not feasible. plus there is some missing routes...how abt the other direction?
I believe a better suggestion would be to loop about Bedok then chiong PIE to Bukit Batok and go downwards to CCK.
Service 47: Jurong East to Upp East Coast
via:
Jurong East Ctrl
Bukit Batok Ave 1
Bukit Batok East Ave 6
Bukit Batok East Ave 3
PIE
Clementi Ave 6
AYE
Clementi Rd
West Coast Highway
Pasir Panjang Rd
Alexandra Rd
Depot Rd
Henderson Rd
Jln Bukit Merah
CTE
PIE
Bedok North Rd
New Upp Changi Rd
Bedok South Ave 2
Bedok South Rd
Upp East Coast Rd
Return Trip:
Upp East Coast Rd
Bedok South Rd
Bedok Sth Ave 2
New Upp Changi Rd
Bedok North Rd
PIE
CTE
Jln Bukit Merah
Henderson Rd
Depot Rd
Alexandra Rd
Pasir Panjang Rd
West Coast Highway
Clementi Rd
AYE
Clementi Ave 6
PIE
Bt Batok East Ave 3
Bt Batok St 23
Bt Batok East Ave 6
Bt Batok East Ave 1
Jurong East Ctrl
Jurong East St 13
Originally posted by Transtar Solitarie:For Service 123, it should starts from Bukit Merah Interchange to Geylang Lorong 1 Terminal. Thats should be the way.
Impossible since 123 is the only link in Bukit Purmei Avenue to Tiong Bahru MRT & Orchard Road and between Orchard Road and Geylang Lorong 1 there is already a 175.
Remove 275 completely. Its outright duplicating with 131
What about this?
Originally posted by Oceane:
I believe a better suggestion would be to loop about Bedok then chiong PIE to Bukit Batok and go downwards to CCK.
That's a good idea.
Originally posted by jayh272416:Remove 275 completely. Its outright duplicating with 131
What about this?
It has been approved by the PTC but SBST has been delaying its withdrawal for goodness knows what reason.
the Bukit Purmai residents want to keep Service 275. if im not wrong. do correct me.
Originally posted by SBS9888Y:the Bukit Purmai residents want to keep Service 275. if im not wrong. do correct me.
I think that they afraid if 131 were to be caught in a traffic jam/delay, there is still 275 to suppplement.
But interestingly Depot Rd residents don't have such concerns when Service 274 was withdrawn. I guess it just means the MPs/Grassroots at Bt Purmei had more speaking power? Lol...
In any case most of the working crowd in Bt Purmei have been relying on Service 123 (or actually, 123M) for their daily commute, as 275 doesn't connect them to any MRT and Harbourfront is a considerable distance away.
Yeah. Know how Bt merah is one of the few interchanges not connected to any MRT stations?
Talking about Depot Rd residents and 274, 57 still plies the long shenton way rt and can bunch even if there's normal traffic conditions. The same can be said for Sengkang West residents and 371. SBS Transit simply tore the pages right off the transitlink guide and threw all 371 destos on the ground. So why can't they do that with 275? Can't they get a downrt. in in case of any jam on 131?
Wow SBST. How smart.
SBST Should renumber Service 275 to 131B and operate it during peak hours.
Amanded Service 42 to Eunos Int via Sims Ave the turn into Jln Kebangwan and then return route after Jln Kebangwan, instead of Siglap Rd, it goes towards Frankel Rd then turn to Changi Rd then Jln Turi and then Eunos Int
Originally posted by jayh272416:Yeah. Know how Bt merah is one of the few interchanges not connected to any MRT stations?
Talking about Depot Rd residents and 274, 57 still plies the long shenton way rt and can bunch even if there's normal traffic conditions. The same can be said for Sengkang West residents and 371. SBS Transit simply tore the pages right off the transitlink guide and threw all 371 destos on the ground. So why can't they do that with 275? Can't they get a downrt. in in case of any jam on 131?
Wow SBST. How smart.
Who knows SBST might be considering shortening 131 to loop at Bukit Purmei Avenue? But let's hope that this kind of thing doesn't happen.......
Originally posted by jayh272416:Yeah. Know how Bt merah is one of the few interchanges not connected to any MRT stations?
Talking about Depot Rd residents and 274, 57 still plies the long shenton way rt and can bunch even if there's normal traffic conditions. The same can be said for Sengkang West residents and 371. SBS Transit simply tore the pages right off the transitlink guide and threw all 371 destos on the ground. So why can't they do that with 275? Can't they get a downrt. in in case of any jam on 131?
Wow SBST. How smart.
You are not being economically correct here.
48 Extended to Clementi Interchange.
Clementi Int - C'wealth avenue west, Clementi Avenue 2, West Coast Road, Clementi Road, C'wealth Avenue West, Holland Avenue , then usual 48 Route.
This will benefit SPers and connect NUS with Dover MRT, and a faster connection between Clementi West and Bugis.
New Route ... err let's call it 144.
Kent Ridge to Serangoon Interchange.
Kent Ridge, Kent Ridge Crescent, Lower Kent Ridge Road, North Buona Vista Road, C'wealth Avenue West, Queensway, Farrer Road, Dunearn Road, Whitley Road, navigate the toa payoh lorongs... braddell Road, Lor Chuan, Serangoon Gardens circus ... then follow 317 route out of serangoon gardens to Serangoon int.
New route ... 209 perhaps?
Woodlands Int - NTU.
Woodlands Int - BKE - Bt Panjang Road - Bt Panjang Int - Choa Chu Kang Road - Choa Chu Kang Way - Choa Chu Kang Int - KJE/PIE - Jalan Bahar - NTU and loop back
One final idea!
44 - Harbourfront to Serangoon Gardens
Harbour Front - Telok Blangah Road - Alexandra Road - C'wealth Avenue - Queensway - Farrer Road/Adam Road/Lornie Road - Braddell Road - Bishan Road - AMK Avenue 1 - Boundary Road - Lor Chuan - Serangoon Gdns Road and loop at circus .
88 - Yishun to Boon Lay Int
Yishun Int - Yishun Ave 3 - Sembawang Rd - Mandai Road - BKE - Bt Panjang Road - Bt Panjang Int - Choa Chu Kang Road - Bt Batok Road - Jurong Town Hall Road - Boon Lay Way - Boon Lay Int.