Redeployments
-
Cross what crap? Which service?Originally posted by Acx1688:SBS1940G is permanent weekend X-over for sv196 -
Good logic. I wont rule out this possibility.Originally posted by SBS 233 X:Those LO3x in arbp without ads are already transferred away. 4 LO3x left in arbp. Namely : SBS9067A, SBS9100L, SBS9149Y & SBS9165A. All with ads.
From my point of view, slbp have 4 VO3x as well. Namely : SBS9255Z, SBS9291T, SBS9303T & SBS9363U. Those VO3x may be lent to slbp while waiting for the 4 LO3x with ad to expire. -
Ya, so the ads on SBS 9291T expire liao la?Originally posted by service_238:Good logic. I wont rule out this possibility. -
Am i right to say that the mystery on sv143 has been solved?Originally posted by SBS 233 X:SBS551C is slbp bus. SBS9830M is a brbp bus. Not likely it's possible.
SBS551C (SL 143
SL 182)
SBS9000S (BR 143 SL 143)(replace SBS551C)
SBS9830M (BR 31 BR 143)(replace SBS9000S)
SBS9120D (AR 10 BR31)(replace SBS9830M)
Correct me if i'm wrong. -
But would they replace an SD with a DD? They would have to re-do their timesheets...Originally posted by choww:Am i right to say that the mystery on sv143 has been solved?
SBS551C (SL 143 SL 182)
SBS9000S (BR 143 SL 143)(replace SBS551C)
SBS9830M (BR 31 BR 143)(replace SBS9000S)
SBS9120D (AR 10 BR31)(replace SBS9830M)
Correct me if i'm wrong. -
All correct. Verified by me.Originally posted by choww:Am i right to say that the mystery on sv143 has been solved?
SBS551C (SL 143 SL 182)
SBS9000S (BR 143 SL 143)(replace SBS551C)
SBS9830M (BR 31 BR 143)(replace SBS9000S)
SBS9120D (AR 10 BR31)(replace SBS9830M)
Correct me if i'm wrong.
All VO3x in slbp are SPs -
Have you checked 9000S's timesheet to see whether it indicates the bus is an ADD and not an A/C SD?Originally posted by service_238:All correct. Verified by me. -
What is your point regarding SD and DD? DD replace SD u should be happy instead.Originally posted by stooper:Have you checked 9000S's timesheet to see whether it indicates the bus is an ADD and not an A/C SD? -
I mean, has the timetable been revised to indicate the change from SD to DD?Originally posted by service_238:What is your point regarding SD and DD? DD replace SD u should be happy instead. -
I still don't see why you are so concerned about the indication...Originally posted by stooper:I mean, has the timetable been revised to indicate the change from SD to DD? -
i tot seein 9000S in braddell depot?
then 9800A has replaced 9815H
wheres 9815H??? -
eh , SBS9800A still perm on 154 ok...Originally posted by SBS9888Y:i tot seein 9000S in braddell depot?
then 9800A has replaced 9815H
wheres 9815H???
Maybe u see SBS9000S at BRAM long ago liao , now this bus belongs to SLBP. -
okok my bad... so the buses in 143 are... 9012H, 9085Y, 9150S, 9815H and 9830MOriginally posted by Volvo Olympian:eh , SBS9800A still perm on 154 ok...
Maybe u see SBS9000S at BRAM long ago liao , now this bus belongs to SLBP.
anyway 9000S is struggling when it speeds it shld b scraped soon and it would be good if 9012H be removed from 143... it seems to be struggling d long dist. route and transferred to something like svc 56 or 179 or 199... more vsos for svc 143 or even b9tls anybody would not oppose it -
disagree , i think LO3x can perform betterOriginally posted by SBS9888Y:okok my bad... so the buses in 143 are... 9000S, 9012H, 9085Y, 9150S and 9815H
anyway 9000S is struggling when it speeds it shld b scraped soon -
but slbp is havin a headache maintainin these busesOriginally posted by Volvo Olympian:disagree , i think LO3x can perform better
bram oso complainin about 9012H, 9036P, 9046K and 9055J
nvm some ppl have diff preferences... -
If it seems to be struggling, do you think it can climb the slopes and hills of 179 & 199?Originally posted by SBS9888Y:it seems to be struggling d long dist. route and transferred to something like svc 56 or 179 or 199... more vsos for svc 143 or even b9tls anybody would not oppose it
Badly maintained buses like 1888A couldn't get to 2nd gear when climbing 179's hill while other MK2s could. -
9176T has been confirmed 179 perm, replacing 3858Z. Has 179 sticker. But timetable hasn't been revised so bus is running on an A/C SD's timesheet.
I suppose 3858Z is SP or some other perm now? It just recently got its NUS ad. -
It was seen on 66 for yesterday and the day before yesterday. Not sure about today.Originally posted by stooper:9176T has been confirmed 179 perm, replacing 3858Z. Has 179 sticker. But timetable hasn't been revised so bus is running on an A/C SD's timesheet.
I suppose 3858Z is SP or some other perm now? It just recently got its NUS ad. -
If i'm not wrong i saw this bus on Sv 66 at Bukit Batok today. Didn't see the stickerOriginally posted by SBS9889U:It was seen on 66 for yesterday and the day before yesterday. Not sure about today. -
SBS 3858Z perm on 66 now
-
You saw the sticker? Then what bus has been taken out of 66?Originally posted by SBS9888Y:SBS 3858Z perm on 66 now -
hahaz.. maybe 2777E.Originally posted by stooper:You saw the sticker? Then what bus has been taken out of 66? -
SBS1888A is now better under Sv 151Originally posted by stooper:If it seems to be struggling, do you think it can climb the slopes and hills of 179 & 199? Badly maintained buses like 1888A couldn't get to 2nd gear when climbing 179's hill while other MK2s could.
This bus have no problem in changing of gear as for now
But for the A/C unit, it look unstable to me as they use scotch-tape to tape up the opening 
-
Ya ya... like B9TL would not struggle on this service. This buses even struggle hardly when are goinging up the slope. You can try it on svc 147. Somemore new bus, I think the engine is not solid enough and would tend to breakdown more often then old buses. BTW, try svc 179 and you know how powerful are LO3x . Btw, i think svc 179 has the most fleet of LO3x in the SLBP.Originally posted by SBS9888Y:more vsos for svc 143 or even b9tls anybody would not oppose it -
SBS 7311 H (AM SP) --> (AM 21)
SBS 7314 A (AM SP) --> (AM 21)
SBS 2625 K (AM 21) --> (AM SP)
SBS 0573 P (AM 21) --> (AM SP)