Did you know.....?
-
1)Upon closing the front & rear door,The BC must depress the brake pedal on a VSO before the bus can move,Ironically this does not apply to other DDs suchs as Leylands/Volvo Olympians,Tridents or B9TLs.
2)That all St Michael's services suchs as 21,124,125,131 & 186 are now under Eunos Route group purview instead of the usual Bishan(Except 131),But only S131 buses parked at BRBP while others still at AMDEP. -
ooouhh...
-
I tot it is because they lifted up the brake pedal when BC stops at bus stop?Originally posted by carbikebus:1)Upon closing the front & rear door,The BC must depress the brake pedal on a VSO before the bus can move,Ironically this does not apply to other DDs suchs as Leylands/Volvo Olympians,Tridents or B9TLs.
2)That all St Michael's services suchs as 21,124,125,131 & 186 are now under Eunos Route group purview instead of the usual Bishan(Except 131),But only S131 buses parked at BRBP while others still at AMDEP. -
Hmm , this is interestingOriginally posted by carbikebus:1)Upon closing the front & rear door,The BC must depress the brake pedal on a VSO before the bus can move,Ironically this does not apply to other DDs suchs as Leylands/Volvo Olympians,Tridents or B9TLs.
2)That all St Michael's services suchs as 21,124,125,131 & 186 are now under Eunos Route group purview instead of the usual Bishan(Except 131),But only S131 buses parked at BRBP while others still at AMDEP.
-
I don't get it. All St Mikes routes under EUN while 131 remains with BSH?
What about 400 & 402? Also why 195 under ARBP while Shenton Way services under AMDEP? Not to mention BNDEP is responsible for CityBuzz. -
By "depress", you mean he must step and then release the pedal once before the bus can move?Originally posted by carbikebus:1)Upon closing the front & rear door,The BC must depress the brake pedal -
Yes my dear friendOriginally posted by stooper:By "depress", you mean he must step and then release the pedal once before the bus can move?
-
ALL STM services are under Eunos, 131 INCLUDED.Originally posted by iveco:I don't get it. All St Mikes routes under EUN while 131 remains with BSH?
What about 400 & 402? Also why 195 under ARBP while Shenton Way services under AMDEP? Not to mention BNDEP is responsible for CityBuzz.
400 and 402 are Bishan route group services.
195 is under Bt Merah route group. -
Just curious? How many "route groups" are there altogether? How do bus companies define the boundary of a route group? (St Michael is quite far away from Eunos leh...)Originally posted by SBS9818A:ALL STM services are under Eunos, 131 INCLUDED.
400 and 402 are Bishan route group services.
195 is under Bt Merah route group.
-
I feel that the nearest depot to the CBD should take charge of loop services originating from these areas. In this case, ARBP seems to be closest.
GLBP isn't counted. That one is managed by SMRT-CSS. -
This applies to the CNGs too.Originally posted by carbikebus:Upon closing the front & rear door,The BC must depress the brake pedal on a VSO before the bus can move. -
-Deleted-
-
That the steering wheels of SBS2615P is similiar to those B9?
-
there's 3 cases of B9TLs rub againts the kerb at Tampines & Pasir Ris area,B9TL are 2 inch wider than normal DDs
-
that comfortdelgro suck at designing?
-
SBS1748X Of BNDEP 32 had this left mirror similiar to Striders/DM3500s/VOs/VSOs type
SBS9631X Of BNDEP 17 had VSO/Tridents/B9 type of air cushion driver seat -
And also 1780B's original rear window has been replaced by a Transbus window! I find it rather surprising that they still will manufacture windows for such an old model!Originally posted by carbikebus:SBS1748X Of BNDEP 32 had this left mirror similiar to Striders/DM3500s/VOs/VSOs type
SBS9631X Of BNDEP 17 had VSO/Tridents/B9 type of air cushion driver seat -
SBS3723D (SL 052) has a wall-mounted bell beside the entrance door just above the guide racks but its rusty... should be disfunctional
-
The door handles of the left entrance door of TIB1222C is inverted? Instead of being )( it becomes: [an inverted J](
-
is it that the former PA-plate merc, the aisle between the transitlink card reader and the left wheels is narrower than the other normal Merc CAC?
that time took one such bus on 52, found it a squeeze to walk back -
Do u know:
- SBST wanted to divert sv100 to Depot Rd but was rejected by the PTC as existing passengers will incur higher fares and longer travel time
- SBST wanted to divert sv76 and 93 to Serganoon stn but was rejected by the PTC as the connection is already provided in existing services.
- SBST wanted to divert sv155 to Upper serganoon rd was rejected by the PTC due to turning constraint at the junction of upper serganoon rd and upper aljunied rd
- SBST wanted to cutback sv 62 and 80 was rejected by the PTC as existing passengers will incur higher fares and longer travelling time
- SBST wanted to introduce 2 new inter-town services, 109 and 110, but was rejected as the proposed routings duplicate the existing public transport services and they do not generate significant benifits to the communters
* All info taken from PTC annual report 03/04. -
Originally posted by choww:Do u know:
- SBST wanted to divert sv155 to Upper serganoon rd was rejected by the PTC due to turning constraint at the junction of upper serganoon rd and upper aljunied rd
- SBST wanted to cutback sv 62 and 80 was rejected by the PTC as existing passengers will incur higher fares and longer travelling time
* All info taken from PTC annual report 03/04.
- If PTC had rejected the plan to cut back 62, we would already have a direct link from Punggol Interchange to New Bridge Rd Terminal.
- If PTC had rejected SBST bid to divert 155 to Upp Serangoon Rd, Now you tell me how this service go to Braddell Rd From Upp Aljunied Rd ? Dont tell me the bus FLY.. -
That for SBST bid to cut 62 : Hougang Sth Int - New Bridge Rd Ter into a loop service.Originally posted by sBs_boy:
And Do you know that 62 had been cut back from New Bridge Rd to become a Punggol - Geylang Lor 1 (Loop) -
I believe this issue was taken aback as the junction of the mentioned roads don't possess any constraints.Originally posted by choww:Do u know:
- SBST wanted to divert sv155 to Upper serganoon rd was rejected by the PTC due to turning constraint at the junction of upper serganoon rd and upper aljunied rd
* All info taken from PTC annual report 03/04. -
Do u know:
- SBST wanted to extend sv506 to Upper East Coast Terminal and amend to ply Jalan Jurong Kechil but was rejected due to cross-territorial implications
**The service was extended to Upper East Coast Terminal in Nov 06.
- SBST wanted to introduce 6 express services between AMK/Hougang and Robinson Rd/Shenton Way but was rejected as connection is already provided by existing basic services
- sv274 and 275 were known as 'Approval lapsed' by PTC.
* Info taken from PTC annual report 05/06.
- PTC approved new service 114 from Hougang Depot to Hougang St 21.
**This service does not exist as of today.Maybe sv115 have some relation with this.
* Info taken from PTC annual report 04/05