SVC 980 USING CAC NISSAN AGAIN
-
ya when 975 was still 175 , so as 172 , 176 used to have Nissans. The Nissans were mostly given to WLDEP coz SMRT thinks that there are most svcs need Nissans like 178 , 187 , 980 thats why. For AMDEP , they got 852 , 853 , 855 and THE MOST IRONIC THING , NO CAC NISSANS have been deployed on feeder svcs , so if they go to KJ , svcs like 61 , 67 , 172 , 173 , 176 , 177 , 180 , 188 , 189 , 925 , 927 , 975 & 985 will stand a high chance of getting it. As for 307 , 941 , 945 & 947 i dont think so even though they should be deployed on feeders. But 975 & 985 will get it first. If they transfer to KJ maybe those Merz and some hinos and dafs will go over to WL. Just dont know why smrt is so biased that they put all the 24 Nissans at WL , and only 6 at AMK & NONE at KJOriginally posted by vivienlee:If Nissans r to go to Kranji, I think tat svc 975 will be the 1st one to kanna
In fact svcs 925 and 927 used to have OAC Nissans before switching its fleets to DAF, somewhere in 1997-1998
-
You have no idea how a Nissan bus looks like, do you?Originally posted by LazerLordz:As a layman, I'm curious to know why someone would get so mad that a particular bus service is using a specific type of bus?
-
Yes I do. And I don't see the bloody fuss over a bus.Originally posted by stooper:You have no idea how a Nissan bus looks like, do you? As long as the aircon works, and it doesn't breakdown often, I'm fine. -
Yes, that's a big problem especially with CAC Nissans...Originally posted by LazerLordz:As long as the aircon works -
Haizz , I don't really understand all these , why hate Nissan?? You may think its a shIt bus to u but for me i think its a nice ride on them. I don't mind if KJDEP have Nissans and deploy on Bt Batok , CCK services. Its just YOU guys here who has already been pampered to new buses like B9TL etc...
-
Services 172 and 175 never have any Nissans before...those old NAC buses are actually Hino buses.Originally posted by swee_heng:ya when 975 was still 175 , so as 172 , 176 used to have Nissans.
Service 176 had used NAC Nissans before till 1998 when KJDEP transferred all its Nissans to WLDEP. -
Went to Boon Lay int today, saw svcs 178 n 187 got lots of CAC NissansOriginally posted by stooper:You go take 178 lah... -
Its fine to deploy on Bt Batok services, BP services, and CCK. But i wont want to see 176 getting Nissans. They're noisy suspension is just too much to bear when one travels in a Nissan while on 176's route. 67 , dont even think about it. Imagine hearing the noisy creaking for a whole 1 1/2 hr journey!Originally posted by Volvo Olympian:Haizz , I don't really understand all these , why hate Nissan?? You may think its a shIt bus to u but for me i think its a nice ride on them. I don't mind if KJDEP have Nissans and deploy on Bt Batok , CCK services. Its just YOU guys here who has already been pampered to new buses like B9TL etc...
-
Sv 67 got Nissan before , TIB1256E if im not wrong , from AMDEP.Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:Its fine to deploy on Bt Batok services, BP services, and CCK. But i wont want to see 176 getting Nissans. They're noisy suspension is just too much to bear when one travels in a Nissan while on 176's route. 67 , dont even think about it. Imagine hearing the noisy creaking for a whole 1 1/2 hr journey! -
Originally posted by swee_heng:
dono whether the bus can make it to interchange not.. esp 61/67??
ya when 975 was still 175 , so as 172 , 176 used to have Nissans. The Nissans were mostly given to WLDEP coz SMRT thinks that there are most svcs need Nissans like 178 , 187 , 980 thats why. For AMDEP , they got 852 , 853 , 855 and THE MOST IRONIC THING , NO CAC NISSANS have been deployed on feeder svcs , so if they go to KJ , svcs like 61 , 67, 172 , 173 , 176 , 177 , 180 , 188 , 189 , 925 , 927 , 975 & 985 will stand a high chance of getting it. As for 307 , 941 , 945 & 947 i dont think so even though they should be deployed on feeders. But 975 & 985 will get it first. If they transfer to KJ maybe those Merz and some hinos and dafs will go over to WL. Just dont know why smrt is so biased that they put all the 24 Nissans at WL , and only 6 at AMK & NONE at KJ[/b]
-
AMDEP had ever used a CAC Nissan (TIB1256E) to cameo on Yushun feeders/intratowns beforeOriginally posted by swee_heng:NO CAC NISSANS have been deployed on feeder svcs... -
Spotted a Nissan CAC on 911 few days ago.Originally posted by TIB1018B:AMDEP had ever used a CAC Nissan (TIB1256E) to cameo on Yushun feeders/intratowns before -
911?Originally posted by Volvo Olympian:Spotted a Nissan CAC on 911 few days ago.
I missed the action
Anyway 911 got UD can accept lah (for me). -
Originally posted by Volvo Olympian:Spotted a Nissan CAC on 911 few days ago.
-
You got pic of this bus??Originally posted by Volvo Olympian:Spotted a Nissan CAC on 911 few days ago. -
Nopes .Originally posted by TIB1018B:You got pic of this bus?? 
-
What if one fine day SMRT transfers UDs to KJ & they serve svcs like [b]77 , 106 , 172 , 173 , 176 , 177 , 180 , 184, 188 , 189 , 190 , 985 BB Feeders , CCK Feeders. Which of the above svcs do you think will be the first to get Nissans? I guess is 985.
-
deleted
-
Originally posted by swee_heng:
Maybe 172 or 180?
What if one fine day SMRT transfers UDs to KJ & they serve svcs like 77 , 106 , 172 , 173 , 176 , 177 , 180 , 184, 188 , 189 , 190 , 985 BB Feeders , CCK Feeders. Which of the above svcs do you think will be the first to get Nissans? I guess is 985. -
Originally posted by swee_heng:
190 get Nissans? Given the current passenger load, the bus haven't even reach the expressway already break down. 77? unlikely, cause got hilly roads at Bukit Batok roads, and the bus is quite under powered and slow, block traffic lah no gd.
What if one fine day SMRT transfers UDs to KJ & they serve svcs like [[b]b]77 , 106 , 172 , 173 , 176 , 177 , 180 , 184, 188 , 189 , 190 , 985 BB Feeders , CCK Feeders. Which of the above svcs do you think will be the first to get Nissans? I guess is 985.[/b]
-
then what about 172 , 180 & 985?Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:190 get Nissans? Given the current passenger load, the bus haven't even reach the expressway already break down. 77? unlikely, cause got hilly roads at Bukit Batok roads, and the bus is quite under powered and slow, block traffic lah no gd. -
Nissan CAC & OAC would also cameo on services 852 and 855 these few days. TIB 1256 E is one of them spotted also on 852.
-
If TIB1256E is deployed on 180, i dont mind. Its speed is good.Originally posted by swee_heng:then what about 172 , 180 & 985? And also if its deployed on 180, i dont think it will break down, cause most of 180 routes were not hilly, except for the CCK/Teck Whye that part, otherwisse its straight and flat road. And also, after peak hours, 180 are seldom pack, therefore lightening its load and strain on the lao pok kai bus chassis. 172 and 985/985W im not sure, never taken them before.But if its TIB1256E on 985, shld be ok, cause TIB1256E speed is good and shld be useful on the PIE. -
To the TS, it's time to stop complaining about Nissan Diesels. So what if 980 is using CAC nissan ? What can you do about it? Why don't you go complain to SMRT ? Posts like this ruin the forums. I have seen a few posts like this but now that is it . I need to voice my opinion.
980 if i am not wrong used to have lots of UDs right ? Now the number has already cut quite a lot, what more do you want? Look at 178 ! You should be lucky 980's fleet is not like 178. Do you think majority of us are happy with the way SMRT are managing with the bus services?
Think about it.
Put up with it and stop whining . -
CSS193R spotted on sv 980 today