If don't work, try this link : http://www.smrt.com.sg/news/2006/service-966.pdfOriginally posted by SBS9176T:
Your link does not work.Originally posted by brotherchen1982:Correct link : http://www.smrt.com.sg/news/2006/service-966.pdf
Prediction come true for Bt Panjang Residents![]()
Then 853, 854 how?Originally posted by TIB433S:It's great news 966 has adopted the 2 SMRT territory and 1 SBST territoty thing. But for people like me, i have to take 184/171/963 to Pending Road and cross to opposite side but it shouldnt be a problem right/
At least LTA is forcing SMRT to amend their buses instead of letting them be same old same old...
That's what appear when I click on Amendment of Service 966 from 7 Jan 07 from SMRT HomepageOriginally posted by SBS9176T:Your link does not work.
What your page show when I click http://www.smrt.com.sg/buses/documents/service-966.pdf:Originally posted by SBS9176T:Your link does not work.
Lol, i think 854 and 853 are probably a special case. But they are both quite popular. and helpful. I guess LTA wanted TIBS to have more SBSt areas in the pastOriginally posted by Donavan:Then 853, 854 how?
Originally posted by TIB433S:It's great news 966 has adopted the 2 SMRT territory and 1 SBST territoty thing. But for people like me, i have to take 184/171/963 to Pending Road and cross to opposite side but it shouldnt be a problem right/
At least LTA is forcing SMRT to amend their buses instead of letting them be same old same old...
I though amendment of services is done by their own company and wait for PTC approvalOriginally posted by TIB433S:At least LTA is forcing SMRT to amend their buses instead of letting them be same old same old...
What Does LTA gotta do with the admendment of Svc 966 ? The Bus Co. is not own by them.. So, theres no way that LTA is "Forcing" SMRTB to admend 966 into Bukit Panjang.Originally posted by TIB433S:At least LTA is forcing SMRT to amend their buses instead of letting them be same old same old...
At the end of the day, they're the one approving any changesOriginally posted by sBs_boy:What Does LTA gotta do with the admendment of Svc 966 ? The Bus Co. is not own by them.. So, theres no way that LTA is "Forcing" SMRTB to admend 966 into Bukit Panjang.
Oh.. If LTA is the one approving the changes.. Then could you kindly explain on why is there a PTC ? Isnt PTC the one approving the changes ? Didn't know that the bus companies need to go through 2 agencies before any routes/changes are being approved.Originally posted by sbst275:At the end of the day, they're the one approving any changes
Can you understand lay-man term?Originally posted by sBs_boy:Oh.. If LTA is the one approving the changes.. Then could you kindly explain on why is there a PTC ? Isnt PTC the one approving the changes ? Didn't know that the bus companies need to go through 2 agencies before any routes/changes are being approved.
Maybe they might improve the freq now, since ridership will increase alot.Originally posted by sbst275:Freq now bad
Agreed...15 min during peak?Originally posted by sbst275:Freq now bad
Cos people complain no link from Bt Panjang to Eastern part of S'pore & to settle the demand of buiing a Bus Stop at an impossible place along PIE.Originally posted by TIB433S:It's great news 966 has adopted the 2 SMRT territory and 1 SBST territoty thing. But for people like me, i have to take 184/171/963 to Pending Road and cross to opposite side but it shouldnt be a problem right/
At least LTA is forcing SMRT to amend their buses instead of letting them be same old same old...
Nissan arh? Put TIB1256E inside larh! Its speed useful on BKE/PIE.Originally posted by SBS9889U:Frequency is just terrible. I rather SMRT adds 1 bus (seriously dont care if it is a nissan) to improve the frequency.