Harlow,That side bus can chion anyhow,No holds barred,No complains on driver's driving skills,And best of all they can chiong w/o fearing of speed traps unlike here where most drivers are selfish enough.22 should be around 7-10mins on peaks and 10-15 mins for off.Originally posted by ZYX2005:my opinion:
compare Hong Kong, and Korea inter city bus freq is 7-9 mins
so 9 mins in my opinion IS SLOW.
YX
Everyone is in a rush, but if you need 985 to get to school, it would be worse, 985 is packed in the morning. See whether 22 or 985 is worse.Originally posted by TWS4793:You may not know that I'm the person who is very kan-chiong one. The moment bus leaves I grumble. Last year I remember making a scene at the interchange by throwing my bag onto the floor! That's because BC does not know that I also have to board, and the passengers are too selfish to give way.
Then again.. By waiting another 9mins.. Will it kill ? or are you trying to say that it will shorten your life by not boarding that bus ?Originally posted by TWS4793:You may not know that I'm the person who is very kan-chiong one. The moment bus leaves I grumble. Last year I remember making a scene at the interchange by throwing my bag onto the floor! That's because BC does not know that I also have to board, and the passengers are too selfish to give way.
Charles,I feel that city buses with excellent acceleration and a speed limit of 70kmh is equadate for us Drivers,Even genuine 65kmh makes a huge differenceOriginally posted by Airbus330Captain:With the size of HK and Korea and the huge population in both countries, frequencies must be fast and it would be insane to install 60km speed limit (Crazy idea from whoever decided this rule in Singapore ). Speed limit , I understand the reasoning for speed limit but at least give 10-20 km extra allowance . Perhaps 80km speed limit for all Singapore buses is more than enough.