Amendment of Service 57

• No_10_Tomas

  14 Jan 07, 21:28

  Originally posted by Yaimster:

  Oh yeah .... 57 also served CJC before ...
  
  Wonder if PTC or LTA were up to against the CJCians =). First Extending 966, now this .

  extending 966 actually benefits CJCcians cos they got one more option to bt panjang
  
  
• autumncs

  14 Jan 07, 21:45

  Originally posted by No_10_Tomas:

  extending 966 actually benefits CJCcians cos they got one more option to bt panjang
  
  

  Well, they gain one option (966), and they lose one option (57)...
• ngjy22

  14 Jan 07, 22:44

  Originally posted by autumncs:

  Well, they gain one option (966), and they lose one option (57)...

  Like what in mandrin? 'qu se' (in order to gain one, you'll have to lose one.)
  
  
• brotherchen1982

  15 Jan 07, 09:10

  Making way for New Service 5?
• ngjy22

  15 Jan 07, 14:11

  I think they will only update their website when there is new amendment, but their update is on that day when the svc amend/new svc. An example is like the Amendment of Svc 123B, today then I saw.
• sbst275

  24 Feb 07, 16:56

  Seems that the demand actually picked up...
• iveco

  24 Feb 07, 17:07

  From BSH to CJC already got 156. Bt Merah to CJC got 153 which is faster.
• sbst275

  24 Feb 07, 17:08

  Originally posted by iveco:

  From BSH to CJC already got 156. Bt Merah to CJC got 153 which is faster.

  The prob is more towards Bt Timah