*me thinks he knows what happened, but keeps his mouth shut and holds back his fingers*Originally posted by MS:Hi all, the case of 7253S fire has involvement of external parties. Please be careful in your remarks as this is a public forum. Unnecessary remarks can easily escalate to defamatory.
There have been many lawsuits against forum members. Definately hope that none will get it here.
Perhaps we should stop the discussion here.
But I don't think this should be classified as confidential stuff... The reason why the bus caught fire should be made public.Originally posted by collinnxk88:Reminds me of the news about Military Nuts forum which is strongly against revealing confidential stuff or making exaggerated speculations.
Yes, but at least let all the investigations be completed first...Originally posted by stooper:But I don't think this should be classified as confidential stuff... The reason why the bus caught fire should be made public.
Just like in a plane crash, the public should be allowed to know why.
We use to have it in the past , there were moderators then , but not for now as this is already a public forum.Originally posted by collinnxk88:off-topic: this forum no thread on guidelines de arh? most sections in sgf have that... at least when ppl break any rule, the management can use the regulations to back up their stand against so-and-so forumner for breaking a regulation.
im asking this bcos sometimes ppl reveal stuff that seems sensitive or are irrational in their postings, and due to that reason fights/quarrels/illogical speculations often evolve.
Do u see SBS Transit doing press release on why their bus was on fire before?Originally posted by eX.A.K.R.:Yes, but at least let all the investigations be completed first...
No. never see it before!Originally posted by chickenlittle2:Do u see SBS Transit doing press release on why their bus was on fire before?