Depends on whether EDB wants to attract Volvo, Scania, Evobus, Irisbus to set up production plants. We are back to square one in vehicle production, Motorimage just produced two Singapore made Subarus, so it may take some while for vehicle producers to have production plants in Singapore.Originally posted by kenn3th:Do you think the Volvo B9TL will be mass produced and found widely in singapore like the vo3x or lo3x? Maybe in 5 to 10 years time?
Unlike the B10TL and limited produced units?
Or will there be other new units?
I would say that this will not happen over here in Singapore. The cost of labour itself is enough to turn people away from Singapore. IMO, SIngapore should concentrate on High-Tech Industry in order to stay ahead of other countries..Originally posted by Scania:Depends on whether EDB wants to attract Volvo, Scania, Evobus, Irisbus to set up production plants. We are back to square one in vehicle production, Motorimage just produced two Singapore made Subarus, so it may take some while for vehicle producers to have production plants in Singapore.
Hmmm, Isnt 200 Enough ?Originally posted by Superbus:I think what the thread-starter meant is, will the B9TL be bought in large numbers, like the LO 3-axles and the VO 3-axles?
Harlow,77 & 106 got hell lots of pax,You withdrawn then pax from Toh tuck take what?Taxis?Originally posted by ngjy22:Prediction:
If SMRTB is saving as much buses as possible, I guess they would withdraw either 106 or 77.
Svc 77 and 106 duplicates the route all the way except for the Commonwealth Ave West, C'wealth Ave, Holland Ave and Toh Tuck Ave.
189 got cover a bit of 106's route and 173 and 852 covers a bit of 77's route, 61 covers a bit of 106 and 77, it would sure be messy if they withdraw it. Its just low possibility of withdrawing this svc, I am not sure about the demand. These are just SMRTB's route comparison, if add in SBST's route, I think some svc can cover the lost of any of these svc passing through Bt Batok.
77 is for people living in Bt Batok, Toh Tuck, Jln Jurong Kechil, Bt Timah, ... to Orchard/MarinaOriginally posted by ngjy22:Prediction:
If SMRTB is saving as much buses as possible, I guess they would withdraw either 106 or 77.
Svc 77 and 106 duplicates the route all the way except for the Commonwealth Ave West, C'wealth Ave, Holland Ave and Toh Tuck Ave.
189 got cover a bit of 106's route and 173 and 852 covers a bit of 77's route, 61 covers a bit of 106 and 77, it would sure be messy if they withdraw it. Its just low possibility of withdrawing this svc, I am not sure about the demand. These are just SMRTB's route comparison, if add in SBST's route, I think some svc can cover the lost of any of these svc passing through Bt Batok.
Different route, Different demand.. If there is a way to cut the number of routes that they have, they would have done that in the very first place.. Wouldnt wait till now.Originally posted by ngjy22:Prediction:
If SMRTB is saving as much buses as possible, I guess they would withdraw either 106 or 77.
Svc 77 and 106 duplicates the route all the way except for the Commonwealth Ave West, C'wealth Ave, Holland Ave and Toh Tuck Ave.
189 got cover a bit of 106's route and 173 and 852 covers a bit of 77's route, 61 covers a bit of 106 and 77, it would sure be messy if they withdraw it. Its just low possibility of withdrawing this svc, I am not sure about the demand. These are just SMRTB's route comparison, if add in SBST's route, I think some svc can cover the lost of any of these svc passing through Bt Batok.