I agree. The side is a tad better than our B9TL.Originally posted by SMRT Buses:Design wise its not that bad...
Lol ! Acceleration is classified under performance. Unless you say performance in speed.Originally posted by carbikebus:In term of performances i vote for B9TL,But for acceleration i goes for the Scania for the 5 cylinder engine
LOL...Sekali the bodywork cracks and buckles from the rattling.Originally posted by ZYX2005:are u folks kidding
that Caetano body does not fit on scania.
they shd have gone for Omnictiy/
bet the pc of crap rattles n vibrates like an ELBO
ZYX
I think u mean "NO way that Scania is better looking"? Cuz some Scanias look really impressive.Originally posted by sBs_boy:NO way that the Scania is better looking.. haha.. I prefer our B9s..
Can you tell me whats the difference? "The" and "that" in this context means that Caetano Scania.Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:I think u mean "NO way that Scania is better looking"? Cuz some Scanias look really impressive.![]()
Hmm...sorry then...i was confused at that time.Originally posted by Scania:Can you tell me whats the difference? "The" and "that" in this context means that Caetano Scania.