Services that deserved to be FAC service..?

• patdog112

  17 Jun 07, 18:36

  which service does not deserve to be fac service?
• SBS9806J

  17 Jun 07, 18:40

  Does or does not
• patdog112

  17 Jun 07, 18:50

  does and doesnt
• BusSpeeder

  17 Jun 07, 19:01

  does and doesn't
• stooper

  17 Jun 07, 23:37

  JIS should remain as NAC...
• manjieass

  18 Jun 07, 06:54

  186 should become fac..
  
  178 should become nac as the aircon is hotter than outside air..!
• SBS9806J

  18 Jun 07, 10:41

  Originally posted by manjieass:

  186 should become fac..

  Yesterday juz saw that SBS3580Z on 186
• MingFreeman

  19 Jun 07, 09:39

  179, 151, 74 should be full air con.
• BusSpeeder

  19 Jun 07, 11:31

  i remember 165 used to be PAC, remember boarding one VO2x, but it has become FAC, 74 should follow 165.
• patdog112

  19 Jun 07, 11:34

  is 28 and 10 still pac?
• SBS9888Y

  19 Jun 07, 12:02

  Originally posted by MingFreeman:

  179, 151, 74 should be full air con.

  i think 93 also...but den i dun think arbp wans to put in VO...
  
  i hope 154 NAC buses stay at 2-3...i really hope 154 would be the only NAC service that goes out of jurong area once the N113CRBs and Mark IIs are gone
• SBS1984E

  19 Jun 07, 13:11

  SBST should upgrade 28 to FAC in their Website or Downgrade 28 to PAC in real life.
• sbst275

  19 Jun 07, 17:02

  Originally posted by SBS9888Y:

  i think 93 also...but den i dun think arbp wans to put in VO...
  
  i hope 154 NAC buses stay at 2-3...i really hope 154 would be the only NAC service that goes out of jurong area once the N113CRBs and Mark IIs are gone

  There's still Sv 74 & 93