Lists of frequencies of bus services that need improving
-
some buses needs improvement on their frequencies. like 162, the frequencies are average. but they need to add on buses. if someone is frequent on 162, you will realized that after 2801T goes, 2802R comes after 20-30 mins. 2804K comes after 15 mins.
state the bus service where you think the frequencies should add on the bus/improving the frequency and state between which bus and which bus and also the bus between both buses. -
966.
-
171,
852,
854E
-
335
852
123 -
Some factors to be taken note>Front driver too fast,Back driver too slow,Road condition,Pax loads(You think just because the sake of few peeps board that bus but only 1/2 full they care to improve?),Available of Drivers(MCs/Urgent leave,No replacement),Breakdown(Front bus cut 5 mins back drag 5 mins)
S966 need to add 1 bus during PM weekdays peak
S969 need two bendies to replace two rigids for God sake
S970 need two more buses during Weekday peak and Weekend PM Peak
S190 need 4 more bendies in xchange for 4 rigids
S189 need one more bendy in xchange for rigid
S912 need to cut 1 bendy in xchange for 1 rigid
S960 need more downroutes to WLDS from Victoria St
S812 need to cut 2 bendies in xchange for 851 rigids
S700 need additional 1 bus
S176 need to increase the freq during AM peak
S922 need to hand over to Bus Plus and deploy 1/2 buses(cut the freq from 25-30min to 20-24 mins)
S975 DAFs to put on certain important services
S857 need at least 1 bendy on normal shift
S852 need to split 80-20 with KJDEP.Morning can start @ 05.25 from BBT int to meet the demands there.
S882 need two buses during Sundays & PHs(Usually packed like sardines) -
966.. if frequency dun improve nvm but juz please release a timetable for tis service
966 off peak nt much ppl taking.. instead of putting more buses they shuld post up the timetable... but peak hrs really need more buses -
let me answer for everyone.
all the services in Singapore....
can? -
Now they cut down to two buses. But the loads are quite healthy.Originally posted by Yaimster:854E
Sv 153, during PM off peak hours. Can wait until 20mins
Sv 107, during off peak hours, wait around 18 mins -
i say liao also no use. bus companies arent looking at this page.
but i still wan to say, 920 needs to be improved. STOP telling pple to take lrt, sometimes, it isn convinent to change from bus to LRT. Further more many students are on bus concession. -
700
-
nearly all services need frequency improvement. especially along places where theres no alternative services
AM off peak buses frequencies are increasing to 15-20 mins through the years.
less people taking buses now? -
X2 . 920 seriously need to improve its freq . LRT can be quite inconvenient , esp when talking abt Saujana residents , Senja residents .Originally posted by hiphop2009:i say liao also no use. bus companies arent looking at this page.
but i still wan to say, 920 needs to be improved. STOP telling pple to take lrt, sometimes, it isn convinent to change from bus to LRT. Further more many students are on bus concession. -
i myself think that 132 needs frequency improving, especially during pm peak hours, sometimes waiting for it can take up to 20-25 mins and sometimes it can be quite full.
-
Lists of the bus services that needs changing to its fleet/frequency (given by others):
107 (i agree too)
123
132 (i agree too)
153
162 (i agree too)
171
176
189
190
335
700
812
852 (i agree too)
854E
857
882
912 (i agree too, can be packed full)
922
960
966
969
970
975 -
Svc 156 especially during evening off-peak hours...19 mins a bus...terrible!
Svc 105 during weekends. -
This one cnt really improve freq , cuz its very obvious that it will be a big loss . Unless the svc uses bus plus .Originally posted by BusSpeeder:Lists of the bus services needed of improving (given by others):
922 -
maybe it should, since 825 already converted to bus plus.Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:This one cnt really improve freq , cuz its very obvious that it will be a big loss . Unless the svc uses bus plus . -
All svcs that have good demand but freq is more than 10 min
-
even if bus plus, also still need 1 driver for every 1 bus.. maybe save a bit of diesel..Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:This one cnt really improve freq , cuz its very obvious that it will be a big loss . Unless the svc uses bus plus .
825 needs ubs plus better.. they are quieter -
The waiting time for 812 is legendary, especially for such a feeder bus. But I wouldn't mind having 1 bendy in exchange for 2 rigids though. But not 851 (They're smellyOriginally posted by carbikebus:S812 need to cut 2 bendies in xchange for 851 rigids ) ! -
think this thread no point la
ALL bus services freq need improvement.
everyone above 10min is already bad enough.
in them days bus freq was 2-5min for hot service (like 147) sn 7to 8 for regular ones (like 17)
ZYX -
76. Even 73 frequency is slightly better. 76 frequency is horrible, especially during peak hours.
-
76 really needs some, but the fleet size is already increasing so there shouldn't be too much of a problem, at least its a bit faster for 76 to come.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:76. Even 73 frequency is slightly better. 76 frequency is horrible, especially during peak hours. -
S76 has 17 buses before the B9s came in until now, of which only 8 buses are B9s.Originally posted by BusSpeeder:76 really needs some, but the fleet size is already increasing so there shouldn't be too much of a problem, at least its a bit faster for 76 to come. -
Service 225-Both Green and White Plates (PM Off Peak Hours)
The queue is really really long at Bedok Interchange. This was what I noticed between 2000hrs to 2100hrs. The bus was almost packed to the nines (bus was totally full-I saw that some 5 to 10 passengers could not board a Service 225G bus after it was full).
Townlink 293 (AM Off Peak Hours-between 1245hrs to 1600hrs)
Times where buses were badly overloaded (and some people were on the steps when SBST says it is not allowed):
From 1245hrs to 1400hrs (applies to Fridays)
After 1345hrs (Mondays to Thursdays)