dfs24. I agree with what you saidOriginally posted by dfs24:First, let me apologise to all members. I understand that this is a redeployment thread, and I have no intention of hijacking this thread to turn it into a "Is 9806J childish?" thread, or some other thread with a similar title.
This would be my last reply to Scania, like in 9806J case, regardless of whether he replies or not.
Let me explain my earlier post, which I understand was provocative.
People cite others as examples or make comparison to other for the following reasons.
1. To provide evidence
2. To prove something
3. To give others a clearer picutre
In my case, it was reason no. 2.
I posted it to prove a simple point. And I successfully did so. It was to show that 9806J lack maturity. His reply "you want to get involved is it?" showed it all. After my reply to his comment, he replied again, sadly childishly. However, his decision to edit the post and remove his latest comment 10 minutes later shows that he has changed, for the better. I saw the reply but will not post it since he deleted it, which also shows that he does not mean whatever he wrote earlier.
Either way, I achieved what I wanted to do. And 9806J has evidently changed. So case closed.
I think soOriginally posted by SBS3675J:Is SBS971Z SBS995E perm Svc 34?
Thanks. I hope to lead a pleasant experience with forumnites.Originally posted by dfs24:To 2671B
I understand your concern. Whether 351M changes or not should not be your main concern. Instead you should focus on changing yourself. If 351M does not change, he only stands to lose out. Like I said, if he wants to be rude, let him be. It just tells us all about the kind of person he is.
Whatever the case, you have a choice to not step in. Do not reply. Others on the forum will make judgments for themselves. You don't have to step in to tell them that 351M is at fault.
What 351M wants is to see you reply. It shows that he has successfully provoked you. If you were to ignore him, then someday he will stop.
Yes. I know you are thinking about 351M damaging your reputation, misleading others to think that you are a trouble maker etc etc. All along, you already admitted that you made mistakes just like everyone else. Most importantly, you decided to change. Trust me, a bad comment from one forum member does not impact your reputation significantly. The key to cleaning up your reputation is to prove it, not to rebut what others have to say. You just have to be polite, and treat others with respect. If others say something nasty, kindly explain your stand without vulgarities in a civilized manner. It takes time for people to change their impression of you, but if you try hard, people will see you differently in the near future.
Maybe it's time to stop protecting 9806J. Your brother has got to learn to face reality and should learn how to respond appropriately. You can't protect him forever anyway. Your protectionist behavior could very well be the reason why some people dislike you.
Lastly, 1049L has kindly reiterated my point, that is to not argue.
If you still have any other comments for me, I think PM would be the way to go. Remember: This is a redeployments thread.
Let us work towards having a pleasant and wonderful experience for all on Sg forums.
Happy discussing everyone![]()
Now then U know...Originally posted by SBS2671B:65 ARBP bus driver told me this
There will be 2 SP LO3x on Service 65 (ARBP) at any time
The LO3x SP ARBP will be in ARBP temporarily
AND 65 will definitely be WAB at the end of the year
He told me that 9019P is one of the SP buses that do 65
And 9588M was missing due to an engine change in ARBP
All Leylands are under Ayer Rajah Bus Park (as stated by BC) and not under BBDEP
Where got enough WABs? Unless SBST making use of alot of SPs B9s and a fair share of new Scanias for 65.Originally posted by SBS2671B:SBS2606R: (ARBP 93)(BBDEP 7)
Coinbox marking 93 striked off, with new 7 marking
BTW
65 ARBP bus driver told me this
There will be 2 SP LO3x on Service 65 (ARBP) at any time
The LO3x SP ARBP will be in ARBP temporarily
AND 65 will definitely be WAB at the end of the year
He told me that 9019P is one of the SP buses that do 65
And 9588M was missing due to an engine change in ARBP
All Leylands are under Ayer Rajah Bus Park (as stated by BC) and not under BBDEP
I remember someone mentioned that it was transfered to S61 after it S61 lost one bendy.Originally posted by carbikebus:Can someone check this
TIB800R is out of KJDEP 106,On Thursday i saw it on S61 with its nut guard removed.Looks AMDEP style
Most likely replaced by a VO2XOriginally posted by SBS2671B:SBS2606R: (ARBP 93)(BBDEP 7)
Coinbox marking 93 striked off, with new 7 marking
Originally posted by sbs&tibs:i just saw this bus at AMK Central.. was shocked also to see that it is 9614X and tot i see the rego wrong.. Then i see again and confirm that i did not see wrongly..
[b]SBS 9614 X
(BN 14) --> (BR 88 )
Perm sticker spotted. Was rather shocked to see it early in the morning on S88 when this bus was actually serving S19 yesterday. Now SBS9613Z has a brother in S88 fleet.
Please check what bus is replacing SBS9614X. Thank you.[/b]
Look at SBS2671B's postOriginally posted by sbs&tibs:Stop suspecting this and that. Perm means perm, cameo means cameo.
The LOs in arbp are just cameoing on S14 S65, they are NOT perm. Wanna know whether the buses are perm or not, check it out yourself or check the duty roster of the service. If the LOs are cameoing on S14 frequently doesn't mean it has to be suspected perm for S14. Since you are a regular of S14 & S65, study the deployments, which bus arrives after another, and you will know which buses will be replaced by the SPs.
ten u never say...Originally posted by brotherchen1982:Now then U know...![]()
![]()
well, we shall see...Originally posted by off_service:Where got enough WABs? Unless SBST making use of alot of SPs B9s and a fair share of new Scanias for 65.
He's been on 13 for a few days during the week. But 13 was running on Holiday1 last week. Wonder if its replacing some LO or something..Originally posted by lemon1974:might be 9482J which went out? it was on SV 13 today.
Might as well just classify as a pure SP bus then, instead of SP/14/65, which eventually means SP anyway.Originally posted by SBS2671B:Redeployements
Info abt the Spare leylands of ARBP:
CONFIRMED by the BC of Service 65. All SP LO3x are SP, 14 and 65 perm at any different times
So now i cannot be blaimed for over suspect (jk)Oh yeah
SBS9003J (BBDEP 99)(ARBP SP/14/65)
SBS9019P (ARBP SP)(ARBP SP/14/65)
SBS9041Z (ARBP SP)(ARBP SP/14/65)
SBS9196K (ARBP SP)(ARBP SP/14/65)
Sorry...pls disregardOriginally posted by TIB1018B:Service 859
Out: TIB1237K
In: TIB821E