Route Amendment for Sv 372
-
Today I was at Hg Int having my drink and the NTWU notice board caught my attention
One of the notice state that there will be a route familiarisation for all Sv 372 BCs(18/10 and 19/10) as there will be a route amendment by end of this month.
The letter was out on this month.
Those who are interested, can go there and have a look
-
Serve the new roads around anchorvale?
-
There also some BC going for route familiarisation on last sunday.. 13 Oct.. Can so called route extention for sv372..Originally posted by gorby107:Today I was at Hg Int having my drink and the NTWU notice board caught my attention
One of the notice state that there will be a route familiarisation for all Sv 372 BCs(18/10 and 19/10) as there will be a route amendment by end of this month.
The letter was out on this month.
Those who are interested, can go there and have a look -
Doubt so..Originally posted by SBS9889U:Serve the new roads around anchorvale? -
Service 372 - Enhancement of Service
http://www.sbstransit.com.sg/press/2007-10-22-01-L.aspx -
-
Call that an "enhancement"?
More like a terbalek
. -
Messy.
-
Looks almost the same... just that the P-structure for Feeder routes have been changed slightly only...Originally posted by SBS1985C:Messy. -
People living in Anchorvale can reach their destination faster, as the old route will take the same time or even faster if they walk from Compass Point
Those bus stops along Punggol Rd that will be skipped by 372, can rely on Sv 163 to bring them to their destination from Sengkang Int -
i think its to help those on the west loop lrt get to their destination faster?
-
Whoa... this is like, useless?
Firstly, from the starting point and the looping point, the distance is just 1 block. 1 miserable block!
2nd point: Those areas that SBS transit decided to add those additional bus stops ALREADY have some trunk services. 67181 already has 159 to cover, 67191 has at least one bus, I know (can't remember which) and also, the looping point is hopelessly terrible. It already has 163 to serve it.
Honestly, a better route will be to turn out and head straight to Anchorvale Drive, make a loop and turn into Compassvale Road and back to the interchange. -
Objective of the admendment.Originally posted by jayh272416:Whoa... this is like, useless?
Firstly, from the starting point and the looping point, the distance is just 1 block. 1 miserable block!
2nd point: Those areas that SBS transit decided to add those additional bus stops ALREADY have some trunk services. 67181 already has 159 to cover, 67191 has at least one bus, I know (can't remember which) and also, the looping point is hopelessly terrible. It already has 163 to serve it.
Honestly, a better route will be to turn out and head straight to Anchorvale Drive, make a loop and turn into Compassvale Road and back to the interchange.
- To let Anchorvle's residents have a faster way home
- Maintain the link from Anchorvale and Rivervale Plaza (Do note that Rivervale still remains as the only "Wet" market that the whole Sengkang can offer.) -
I think they should make it a bi-diectional loop sevice like 225, 231, 243 o 410. That might be better.