Not only about the money...waiting times for transferring is quite an important soon. Imagine making 2 transfers and end up waiting 20 mins.Originally posted by tanjun:I guess since SMRT controls a large portion of area in terms of MRT lines, they don't really need to introduce a lot of trunk service routes to complement with the MRT lines. Anyway, many people are taking MRT nowadays instead of trunk service buses to their destinations since they are faster.
So, I infer that with Circle Line coming up, they are trying to make journeys especially at SMRT areas like this.
Feeder/Trunk to MRT, MRT to another MRT station. Feeder/Trunk from MRT station to another destination.
As a result, multiple transfers are required.
What I can recommend is that perhaps they can increase the transfer rebate to reduce the prices caused by transferring and make this type of journeys a more attractive one.
Originally posted by phillipC:It's a different thing...
This is what I called "suck thumb"......
You can't do anything with the nonsense reply.
Quite a lot of things not answer : eg but what about the basic services used by the majority?
Withdraw service 921 and substitute that with service 922. that's is called introduction of new service. same for 882.
Also, after 12.00 midnight you will hardly see any SMRT services in town that return to the housing estates.... Conversely.... at 1 am I still can see Sv 170 plying from JB towards Queen Street at Woodlands Road.
How "well" can they get when I have to wait 8 mins for a North-South line train during off peak, at times even above 10 mins, irregular waiting times (ranging from 2 to 5 mins) in the morning peak and trains that's almost forever filled up (seating capacity are 100% filled for large percentage of trips)?Originally posted by Oceane:Well, SMRT has done magnificently well for the Trains part, maybe because they specialise in trains.
The 90 sec freq doesn't include stations beyond Yishun (North bound). Frequency at Yishun and beyond still stands at 4 to 5 mins that time.Originally posted by ZYX2005:all SMRT needs to do is go back to 2000 year plan. look at the stub marked train scheduling and reset freq to 90 sec per train during peak and 2 min off peak
settle the matter
ZYX
EsplanadeOriginally posted by phillipC:
This is what I called "suck thumb"......
You can't do anything with the nonsense reply.
Quite a lot of things not answer : eg but what about the basic services used by the majority?
Withdraw service 921 and substitute that with service 922. that's is called introduction of new service. same for 882.
Also, after 12.00 midnight you will hardly see any SMRT services in town that return to the housing estates.... Conversely.... at 1 am I still can see Sv 170 plying from JB towards Queen Street at Woodlands Road.
[/quote]
[quote]Originally posted by Oceane:It's a different thing...
170 plies between MY and SG so after midnight expect to see some buses still plying between these 2 countries. That's because Malaysian workers often makes use of these buses to go back to MY and since some of them gets off from work quite late these buses are still required to be in operation to fetch them back to MY.
Bro, I am saying from JB to Queen St leh.... You are talking about the opposite direction here.Originally posted by Oceane:It's a different thing...
170 plies between MY and SG so after midnight expect to see some buses still plying between these 2 countries. That's because Malaysian workers often makes use of these buses to go back to MY and since some of them gets off from work quite late these buses are still required to be in operation to fetch them back to MY.
Worst still , both svc frequency suck . Making 2 transfers means 40mins is spent just waiting for the bus.Originally posted by Zilchster:Not only about the money...waiting times for transferring is quite an important soon. Imagine making 2 transfers and end up waiting 20 mins.
How could you compare SMRT train ridership with SBST's NEL ? I guess you shld need to count the number of stations that are under SMRT and the number of stations that SBST are operating.Originally posted by Oceane:Yep, I just read an article posted by tammy off the Trains forums, SMRT's train ridership hit 40 million for the first time ever. In a month. I think even SBST can't be on par with it, considering over 2 million bus riderships and less than 400k train riderships.
Well, SMRT has done magnificently well for the Trains part, maybe because they specialise in trains.
If SBST can chug up such a huge sum of money to buy new buses even with monthly riderships less than 13 times that of SMRT, why can't SMRT? I'm happy to welcome the doubling of bus fleets as it would make passenger satisfaction higher.
Originally posted by phillipC:is now called ASS 975
One more thing to add for 975.
Deleted two or three bus stops at Upper Bt Timah road and make one stop at Bt Panjang road.... is called service "[b]enhancement"?
DAF buses changed to majority Nissan UD is also called "enhancement"?
[/b]
For Bus department SBST is doing more better than SMRTOriginally posted by sBs_boy:How could you compare SMRT train ridership with SBST's NEL ? I guess you shld need to count the number of stations that are under SMRT and the number of stations that SBST are operating.
SMRT has done magnificently well for the train part ? Sorry bro, as a regular communter for both side of the train system, i dare say that SBST is doing alot better then what SMRT is doing.
Lastly, with regards to buying of new buses for SMRTB, sad to say.. That is not going to be happening at near future.
Do you really need me to go dig up my posts from the Trains forums and shoot back at you?Originally posted by off_service:How "well" can they get when I have to wait 8 mins for a North-South line train during off peak, at times even above 10 mins, irregular waiting times (ranging from 2 to 5 mins) in the morning peak and trains that's almost forever filled up (seating capacity are 100% filled for large percentage of trips)?
Originally posted by Oceane:Do you really need me to go dig up my posts from the Trains forums and shoot back at you?
Do call me up if you need.![]()
Originally posted by phillipC:Yup. I agreed that the last bus timings are good ones but notice that the areas is at city areas. I guess the reason why SMRT closes shop early for its services like 190, 700A is due to several reasons which I infer.
The last bus timings by Tamago is a good one. As for 700A, my experience is that at 11.30-11.40 will be the last bus departing at Esplanade.
One more thing to add for 975.
Deleted two or three bus stops at Upper Bt Timah road and make one stop at Bt Panjang road.... is called service "[b]enhancement"?
DAF buses changed to majority Nissan UD is also called "enhancement"?
[/b]
How could you compare SMRT train ridership with SBST's NEL ? I guess you shld need to count the number of stations that are under SMRT and the number of stations that SBST are operating.by sbs_boy
SMRT has done magnificently well for the train part ? Sorry bro, as a regular communter for both side of the train system, i dare say that SBST is doing alot better then what SMRT is doing.
Lastly, with regards to buying of new buses for SMRTB, sad to say.. That is not going to be happening at near future.
Correct,The early example has been set by SMRT buses liao.They predict that trains are the preferred choices over buses in 2-3 years time.So basically buses is just some back up.Originally posted by tanjun:by sbs_boy
I am not sure what criterias u have set to grade the train services. SMRT's train freq is faster than SBST just that they need to improve the freq to meet up with the soaring demand.
With the new circle line and other lines coming up, public buses are going to be degraded to a state where they provide a link from our stop to stop homes to MRT stations where all of us take the MRT to another place and take a bus to our destinations.
It gets really irritating when people start questioning about the frequency of trains when they themselves know that they generally wait longer for a bus than a train. Then, next, like I've explained in the trains forums, the cause of you seeing a 8 or 9 minutes displayed as "Next train" on the plasma screen TV is due to firstly, passengers taking their own sweet time, therefore messing up the accuracy of the schedule. Next, the next train info works on a system that is highly sensitive and sometimes it may go wrong.Originally posted by ^tamago^:![]()
![]()
![]()
omgs did i see wrongly?!Originally posted by tanjun:I am not sure what criterias u have set to grade the train services. SMRT's train freq is faster than SBST just that they need to improve the freq to meet up with the soaring demand.
Sometimes, due to the positioning of the train before the next station, the sensor actually gets a wrong reading and displays the wrong info. So if the next train is in 2 minutes, sometimes an error with the sensor can cause it to change it to 3 or 4 minutes.Originally posted by ^tamago^:Trains actually rarely get delayed during off-peak hours. Bring a digital clock in and monitor the times. If not it cannot meet the 96% departure accuracy requirement. So there is really no excuse for 9-minute frequencies.
And no, I also don't buy the faulty timings thing. The people who saw 9 minutes most likely had to endure 9 minutes.
After the incident between ayam which ngjy showed him some pics of SLBP buses... I think people here DO like creating fantasized stories. Some.Originally posted by ^tamago^:And no, I also don't buy the faulty timings thing. The people who saw 9 minutes most likely had to endure 9 minutes.
Nope. I have to say SMRT train freq is better than SBST even though SBST one is more regulated. This I infer is probably due to the fact that SBST trains are computer controlled which can control its freq perfectly.Originally posted by Y_Shun:omgs did i see wrongly?!![]()