Originally posted by my@jas:SBS0300K
(53 AMDEP)
Non-user lay-up till 11 Jun 2008
Now even DM Merz starting to go for lay-up
lol good thing i jus boarded it adless on 54 last week
deleted and moved http://www.sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/311929
as above
as above
Originally posted by SBS9888Y:
SBS249B
(BRBP SPNon User Lay-Up Status till 11 Jun 2008)
all those 0405s becoming spare buses are likely to be laid up.
I thought this bus just refurbished? Waste money leh..
Originally posted by bus74:mistake:
SBS 7400J -> ARBP 14
BBDEP SP
For clarification, SBS7400J was not AR14, it juz cameod on sv14, on other days it was on other BB/AR svcs namely sv147, sv196, more for sv196
Same for SBS7354J
Originally posted by azharjj:
Really ?Then can i say this:
SBS251T on service 157 [SL SP] - 2 days ago
Coz i saw this bus or is it i saw it 1 week ago...
Or did u see SBS124C?
It also have the Moove Skyliner.
Originally posted by Acx1688:
For clarification, SBS7400J was not AR14, it juz cameod on sv14, on other days it was on other BB/AR svcs namely sv147, sv196, more for sv196Same for SBS7354J
SBS7354J was perm for a while. It had the G2000 ads
Originally posted by Acx1688:
For clarification, SBS7400J was not AR14, it juz cameod on sv14, on other days it was on other BB/AR svcs namely sv147, sv196, more for sv196Same for SBS7354J
but according to wiki it is ARBP 14.
i just quote frm there
SBS8071T
(SP HGDEP
SP ARBP)
Originally posted by Oceane:After sleeping in AMDEP for a long time...
SBS103M
(AMDEP 410Non-User Lay-Up Status until 31 Aug 2008)
Suspected replacements:
SBS88Z* or SBS3849A
*SP sticker is still there... got to check it again. Or maybe there's another bus replacing 103M.
SBS574L is perm 410W. 410G got 4 buses only.
Originally posted by choww:
SBS574L is perm 410W. 410G got 4 buses only.
88Z still SP then. :)
Originally posted by choww:
SBS574L is perm 410W. 410G got 4 buses only.
the perm buses on 410 rotates around 410W and 410G
Originally posted by BusSpeeder:the perm buses on 410 rotates around 410W and 410G
Most of the Bishan services practice the drivers perm on buses policy.
S57 S59 are 2 of them. Not sure about the rest.
Originally posted by Acx1688:
Same for SBS7354J
SBS7354J has been perm 14 since it had B9TL perms... and it still is.
SBS9196K
SLBP SP
SLBP 154
Perm sticker and marking
TIB 1042E
(KJDEP 106
AMDEP) - Back into AMDEP!
TIB 1177A
(KJDEP 106
AMDEP)
TIB 0497H
(AMDEP 171
KJDEP)
TIB 0762S
(AMDEP 859
KJDEP)
I'm rather expecting 859 rigids to be over in KJDEP. :)
Originally posted by choww:
SBS574L is perm 410W. 410G got 4 buses only.
Wow 4 buses nia....
Originally posted by Oceane:TIB 1042E
(KJDEP 106AMDEP) - Back into AMDEP!
TIB 1177A
(KJDEP 106AMDEP)
TIB 0497H
(AMDEP 171KJDEP)
TIB 0762S
(AMDEP 859KJDEP)
I'm rather expecting 859 rigids to be over in KJDEP. :)
There's more i guess
CSS194M
(AMDEP SP) to (KJDEP SP)
TIB505T
(AMDEP 171) to (KJDEP SP) << Today on Svc 188
TIB868X
(KJDEP SP) to (WLDEP)
TIB889K
(KJDEP 190) to (WLDEP) <<Today on 962
TIB1032J
(KJDEP 106) to (WLDEP) <<Today on 856
SBS9813M SBS9823J
(BNDEP 9
BNDEP 222)
SBS9820S
(BNDEP SP
BNDEP 222)
SBS9464L
(BNDEP 222
BNDEP 9)
SBS9211A SBS9300B
(BNDEP 222
BNDEP SP)
SBS9338T
(BNDEP 69
BNDEP 9)
SBS9819Y SBS9838S SBS9848M SBS9849L
(BNDEP SP
BNDEP 69)
SBS9224M SBS9266S SBS9316G
(BNDEP 69
BNDEP SP)
With that, there are no more SPs VSO in BNDEP
Originally posted by 566117:SBS9196K
SLBP SPSLBP 154
Perm sticker and marking
so which bus is it replacing? Is it replacing a VO2x to make it SP? Cos SLBP are short of VO2x.
Originally posted by chickenlittle2:
so which bus is it replacing? Is it replacing a VO2x to make it SP? Cos SLBP are short of VO2x.
Highly likely.
Originally posted by choww:SBS9849L
SBS9849K
Originally posted by choww:SBS9338T
(BNDEP 69BNDEP 9)
SBS9819Y SBS9838S SBS9848M SBS9849L
(BNDEP SPBNDEP 69)
SBS9224M SBS9266S SBS9316G
(BNDEP 69BNDEP SP)
With that, there are no more SPs VSO in BNDEP
wow VSO perm on 69!!! that is cool man. now I think SBS9343C and SBS9348P is the only 2 perm Vo3X on 69...
Do you guys mind posting SMRT redeployments in the other thread? It will be easier for future reference ![]()