Edited photo of buses
-
SBS525D on 59
The ultimate "what to do when you are bored:(say hello to many-destoes)
-
ur 59 desto looks weird and btw. it is not rare?
-
SBS8033D,
I know how easy it is to take the simple way out by ignoring the replies to your wonderful post of that 9888Y, create a new identity and start afresh. In fact I'm very surprised if you had not already done or contemplated to do so.
To the amount of effort you placed in copying, removing and pasting the copyright logo, do the edits and finally post it online, I'm pretty amazed that you do not even bother to send a simple e-mail to the owner to the gallery to request for permission.
Fine if you still insist on blatantly copying and editing it, but its a fact that your photoshopped photo is a great disgrace to this special bus and the community...to put it simply it sooooo simple to identify the edits as they are so poorly done that it would be insulting the intelligence of the members here!
Do note that your imageshack account will be terminated by imageshack if it is reported as being abused. As a warning, previous members who have used the photos of others without permission have their photo hosting sites terminated as it constitutes as an abuse under the terms of conditions.
http://reg.imageshack.us/content.php?page=rules
The following types of files constitute "abuse" may not be uploaded under any circumstances:
- Pornographic files. This includes, but is not limited to, files depicting genitalia, nudity, or sexual situations.
- Files that are illegal and/or are in violation of any United States laws.
- Files that infringe on the copyrights of any entity excluding the user.
- Non-image or non-swf files. This includes archived non-image files.
- Files intending to harass or spam, or promote anything for commercial profit
It can't be that hard to type out an apology, can it?
-
Originally posted by TIB1186Z:
SBS8033D,
I know how easy it is to take the simple way out by ignoring the replies to your wonderful post of that 9888Y, create a new identity and start afresh. In fact I'm very surprised if you had not already done or contemplated to do so.
To the amount of effort you placed in copying, removing and pasting the copyright logo, do the edits and finally post it online, I'm pretty amazed that you do not even bother to send a simple e-mail to the owner to the gallery to request for permission.
Fine if you still insist on blatantly copying and editing it, but its a fact that your photoshopped photo is a great disgrace to this special bus and the community...to put it simply it sooooo simple to identify the edits as they are so poorly done that it would be insulting the intelligence of the members here!
Do note that your imageshack account will be terminated by imageshack if it is reported as being abused. As a warning, previous members who have used the photos of others without permission have their photo hosting sites terminated as it constitutes as an abuse under the terms of conditions.
It can't be that hard to type out an apology, can it?
I believe you can give it up. People in this forum don't learn despite me stressing infringement of copyright for so long. No use of correcting them at all and it will save your efforts. =) -
juz asking if any1 is willing to lend me a pic of e latest SMRT bendy bus? Better if no commercials. Thks!
-
Originally posted by TIB1186Z:
SBS8033D,
I know how easy it is to take the simple way out by ignoring the replies to your wonderful post of that 9888Y, create a new identity and start afresh. In fact I'm very surprised if you had not already done or contemplated to do so.
To the amount of effort you placed in copying, removing and pasting the copyright logo, do the edits and finally post it online, I'm pretty amazed that you do not even bother to send a simple e-mail to the owner to the gallery to request for permission.
Fine if you still insist on blatantly copying and editing it, but its a fact that your photoshopped photo is a great disgrace to this special bus and the community...to put it simply it sooooo simple to identify the edits as they are so poorly done that it would be insulting the intelligence of the members here!
Do note that your imageshack account will be terminated by imageshack if it is reported as being abused. As a warning, previous members who have used the photos of others without permission have their photo hosting sites terminated as it constitutes as an abuse under the terms of conditions.
It can't be that hard to type out an apology, can it?
off-topic: hey! u r doing 912 today!
-
To all,
If you want to use other prople photos, please ask.
Just a portion of the copyright law in Singapore, by the High court
Nature of Copyright12.1.1 Copyright is the term used to describe the bundle of rights that is granted by statute in respect of original works and other subject-matter for limited periods of time and subject to certain permitted exceptions. In Singapore, that statute is the Copyright Act (Cap 63, 1999 Rev ed) (‘CA’). Unlike registered designs and patents, copyright is not a monopoly. It is essentially a negative right to prevent copying. This means that if two identical works were in fact produced independently of one another, there is no infringement of copyright by one of the other (Chua Puay Kiang v Singapore Telecommunications Limited [2000] 3 SLR 640).Subject-matter of Copyright12.1.2 There is no copyright in ideas, information, principles and facts as such. Rather, copyright only protects the way in which they are expressed. Further, copyright protects the skill, labour and/or judgment used in creating the expression. In particular, copyright subsists in literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works (“works” or “a work”), such as novels, plays, musical compositions, paintings and sculptures, as well as in subject-matter other than the works, such as sound recordings, films, broadcasts, cable programmes and published editions of works. Additionally, copyright protection is available in respect of live performances and rights management information, such as information identifying the author of a work and the terms and conditions relating to the use of the work.Subsistence of Copyright12.1.3 Copyright arises immediately upon creation. Specifically, there is copyright protection in a work as soon as it is expressed or fixed in a material form (e.g. paper, tape and film) from which it is capable of being reproduced. Unlike registered designs, patents and trade marks, there are no formalities required for copyright to subsist and no system of registration of rights. In general, copyright subsists in a work or subject-matter in Singapore if (1) the work or subject-matter was first published or made in Singapore or in a member country of the Berne Convention or the WTO; or (2) the author of the work or the maker of the subject was a citizen or resident of Singapore or of a member country of the Berne Convention or the WTO at the time when the work was first published or made.Duration of Copyright12.1.4 Generally, copyright in a literary, dramatic or musical work, or in an artistic work other than a photograph, subsists during the life of the author plus 70 years after his death. In the case of a sound recording and film, copyright subsists until the expiry of 70 years after the expiry of the calendar year in which the recording or film was first published. The duration of copyright protection for a broadcast and cable programme is 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which the broadcast was made or the programme was first included in a cable programme service. The duration of copyright protection for a published edition of a work or works is 25 years from the expiry of the calendar year in which the edition was first published.Ownership of Copyright12.1.5 The general rule is that the person who created a work is the owner of the copyright in the work. However, another person is the owner if• the copyright was assigned to that person; or• the work was created by the creator in the course of his employment by that person.12.1.6 Additionally, if the person who created the work• was doing so in the course of his employment as a journalist or a writer for a newspaper, magazine or periodical or under a contract of service or apprenticeship, the proprietor of the newspaper, magazine or periodical would be the owner of the copyright, but only for the purpose of publishing or reproducing the work in the newspaper, magazine or periodical;• is a photographer or artist engaged to take a photograph of a person or to draw the portrait of a person, the person would be the copyright owner and he has the right to prevent the photographer or artist from using the photograph or painting for any purpose that he has not agreed to.Exclusive Rights and Infringement12.1.7 The CA confers on the copyright owner the exclusive right to do, or to authorise others to do, certain acts (‘primary infringements’) in relation to a work, or subject matter like sound recordings, and films, such as:• to reproduce the work in a material form;• to publish the work if the work is unpublished;• to perform the work in public;• to make an adaptation of the work or to do any of the above in relation to an adaptation;• to communicate the work to the public;• to make a copy of the sound recording or film; and• to cause the film, insofar as it consists of visual images, to be seen in public.12.1.8 Copyright infringers are therefore those who do any of the above acts without the copyright owner’s consent. The owner’s rights are also infringed by such acts (‘secondary infringements’) as• importing, selling, offering for sale and exhibiting in public of any article where the infringer knows, or ought reasonably to know, that the article was made without the copyright owner’s consent;• falsely attributing the authorship of a work or the identity of the performer of a performance; and• falsely removing or altering the rights management information electronically attached to a work.A copyright owner can sue an infringer in respect of any of these primary and secondary infringements, seeking any of the remedies referred to in Section 12.1.16 below.Copyright Offences12.1.9 The primary and secondary infringements can also be the subject of criminal proceedings initiated by the copyright owner. The proceedings are available for a primary infringement if it is wilful and significant and the infringer commits the infringement to obtain a commercial advantage, in which event he would be liable, if convicted, to a fine not exceeding $20,000 and/or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months. In the case of a second or subsequent offence, the maximum fine and imprisonment term are $50,000 and 3 years respectively.12.1.10 As regards the secondary infringements, the penalties generally range from a fine not exceeding $10,000 per article or $100,000 in the aggregate, whichever is the lower, and/or an imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3-5 years.Permitted Acts12.1.11 The CA has several provisions permitting certain acts which do not constitute copyright infringements. These acts are intended to strike a fair balance between the interest of copyright owners and the public interest. They include acts (popularly known as “fair dealings”) for the purposes of research and study, criticism or review, and reporting current events. To constitute fair dealing for research and study, not more than an article in a periodical or a reasonable proportion of a work (generally, 10% of the pages or a chapter) is to be taken, and the court is also to have regard to such factors as the nature of the work, the amount and substantiality of the part of the work that was copied in relation to the whole work as well as the effect on the potential market. In respect of fair dealing for criticism or review, or for reporting current events, there must also be a sufficient acknowledgement of the work.12.1.12 In addition, there are defences catering to a variety of more esoteric acts, such as• reproduction for purposes of judicial proceedings, professional advice or simulcast;• temporary, incidental or transient reproduction of a work as part of the technical process of making or receiving a communication;• observing, studying or testing the functioning of a computer program in order to determine the ideas and principles which underlie any element of the program;• incidental inclusion of a work in a film, television broadcast or cable programme; and• reading or recitation of an extract of a reasonable length from a published literary or dramatic work in public.Dealings in Copyright12.1.13 Being a property right, copyright can be licensed, assigned or otherwise transferred in a variety of ways. For instance, the copyright owner can license or assign the right to reproduce his work in a material form to one person and the right to perform the work in public to another person. He can also license or assign the copyright in terms of the whole or part of the copyright period or by geographical area. As a result, there can be a bewilderingly large number of licensees and/or owners of different parts of the copyright in a work.12.1.14 An assignment of copyright (whether total or partial) must be in writing and signed by or on behalf of the assignor (the copyright owner). An assignment can also be entered into in respect of copyright that has yet to come into existence, in which event the assignment will only be effective to transfer ownership of the copyright as soon as the work is created.12.1.15 A licence need not be in writing, although it is advisable that it should be so, especially in the case of an exclusive licence (see below). A licence which is not in writing does not bind subsequent assignees of the copyright except a bona fide purchaser for value who does not know of the licence. A licence may be exclusive or non-exclusive. An exclusive licence even excludes the licensor (i.e. the copyright owner) from doing whatever the licence permits – that is, the exclusive licensee is almost the owner of the copyright. Indeed, section 123 of the CA treats an exclusive licensee as the owner for many purposes connected with remedies, as it states that the rights and remedies of an exclusive licence are concurrent with those of the copyright owner.Remedies12.1.16 The range of remedies which the Court can order in infringement proceedings includes an injunction, either damages or an account of profits, an order for delivery up and/or disposal of infringing articles in relation to the copyright. In lieu of damages or an account of profits, the copyright owner can elect for an award of statutory damages, for which the court can grant not more than $10,000 for each work or subject matter in respect of which the copyright has been infringed but not more than $200,000 in the aggregate, unless the owner proves that his actual loss from such infringement exceeds $200,000. In awarding statutory damages, the court shall have regard to a number of factors, including• the nature and purpose of the infringing act (e.g. whether it was of a commercial nature);• the flagrancy of the infringement;• whether the defendant acted in bad faith;• any loss that the plaintiff has suffered or is likely to suffer by reason of the infringement; and• any benefit shown to have accrued to the defendant by reason of the infringement.Taken from http://www.singaporelaw.sg/content/iplaw2.html. -
whoa!
-
Originally posted by SBS8033D:
showing pic from my own cam
there are 6 mistakes,1 obvious here,find them out!
SBS8033D you stupid idiot don't you know you are very arrogant and want to act like a big boss when you are really an idiot? -
SBS8033D's actions must be condemned.
-
Originally posted by bus555:
ur 59 desto looks weird and btw. it is not rare?
I swap over 95 desto one xD -
Originally posted by AEW5001:
juz asking if any1 is willing to lend me a pic of e latest SMRT bendy bus? Better if no commercials. Thks!
Volgren bendies can or not??? Look quite new to me...
Anyway, latest bendies is Hispano Habit
-
Originally posted by SBS n SMRT:
To all,
If you want to use other prople photos, please ask.
Just a portion of the copyright law in Singapore, by the High court
Nature of Copyright12.1.1 Copyright is the term used to describe the bundle of rights that is granted by statute in respect of original works and other subject-matter for limited periods of time and subject to certain permitted exceptions. In Singapore, that statute is the Copyright Act (Cap 63, 1999 Rev ed) (‘CA’). Unlike registered designs and patents, copyright is not a monopoly. It is essentially a negative right to prevent copying. This means that if two identical works were in fact produced independently of one another, there is no infringement of copyright by one of the other (Chua Puay Kiang v Singapore Telecommunications Limited [2000] 3 SLR 640).Subject-matter of Copyright12.1.2 There is no copyright in ideas, information, principles and facts as such. Rather, copyright only protects the way in which they are expressed. Further, copyright protects the skill, labour and/or judgment used in creating the expression. In particular, copyright subsists in literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works (“works” or “a work”), such as novels, plays, musical compositions, paintings and sculptures, as well as in subject-matter other than the works, such as sound recordings, films, broadcasts, cable programmes and published editions of works. Additionally, copyright protection is available in respect of live performances and rights management information, such as information identifying the author of a work and the terms and conditions relating to the use of the work.Subsistence of Copyright12.1.3 Copyright arises immediately upon creation. Specifically, there is copyright protection in a work as soon as it is expressed or fixed in a material form (e.g. paper, tape and film) from which it is capable of being reproduced. Unlike registered designs, patents and trade marks, there are no formalities required for copyright to subsist and no system of registration of rights. In general, copyright subsists in a work or subject-matter in Singapore if (1) the work or subject-matter was first published or made in Singapore or in a member country of the Berne Convention or the WTO; or (2) the author of the work or the maker of the subject was a citizen or resident of Singapore or of a member country of the Berne Convention or the WTO at the time when the work was first published or made.Duration of Copyright12.1.4 Generally, copyright in a literary, dramatic or musical work, or in an artistic work other than a photograph, subsists during the life of the author plus 70 years after his death. In the case of a sound recording and film, copyright subsists until the expiry of 70 years after the expiry of the calendar year in which the recording or film was first published. The duration of copyright protection for a broadcast and cable programme is 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which the broadcast was made or the programme was first included in a cable programme service. The duration of copyright protection for a published edition of a work or works is 25 years from the expiry of the calendar year in which the edition was first published.Ownership of Copyright12.1.5 The general rule is that the person who created a work is the owner of the copyright in the work. However, another person is the owner if• the copyright was assigned to that person; or• the work was created by the creator in the course of his employment by that person.12.1.6 Additionally, if the person who created the work• was doing so in the course of his employment as a journalist or a writer for a newspaper, magazine or periodical or under a contract of service or apprenticeship, the proprietor of the newspaper, magazine or periodical would be the owner of the copyright, but only for the purpose of publishing or reproducing the work in the newspaper, magazine or periodical;• is a photographer or artist engaged to take a photograph of a person or to draw the portrait of a person, the person would be the copyright owner and he has the right to prevent the photographer or artist from using the photograph or painting for any purpose that he has not agreed to.Exclusive Rights and Infringement12.1.7 The CA confers on the copyright owner the exclusive right to do, or to authorise others to do, certain acts (‘primary infringements’) in relation to a work, or subject matter like sound recordings, and films, such as:• to reproduce the work in a material form;• to publish the work if the work is unpublished;• to perform the work in public;• to make an adaptation of the work or to do any of the above in relation to an adaptation;• to communicate the work to the public;• to make a copy of the sound recording or film; and• to cause the film, insofar as it consists of visual images, to be seen in public.12.1.8 Copyright infringers are therefore those who do any of the above acts without the copyright owner’s consent. The owner’s rights are also infringed by such acts (‘secondary infringements’) as• importing, selling, offering for sale and exhibiting in public of any article where the infringer knows, or ought reasonably to know, that the article was made without the copyright owner’s consent;• falsely attributing the authorship of a work or the identity of the performer of a performance; and• falsely removing or altering the rights management information electronically attached to a work.A copyright owner can sue an infringer in respect of any of these primary and secondary infringements, seeking any of the remedies referred to in Section 12.1.16 below.Copyright Offences12.1.9 The primary and secondary infringements can also be the subject of criminal proceedings initiated by the copyright owner. The proceedings are available for a primary infringement if it is wilful and significant and the infringer commits the infringement to obtain a commercial advantage, in which event he would be liable, if convicted, to a fine not exceeding $20,000 and/or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months. In the case of a second or subsequent offence, the maximum fine and imprisonment term are $50,000 and 3 years respectively.12.1.10 As regards the secondary infringements, the penalties generally range from a fine not exceeding $10,000 per article or $100,000 in the aggregate, whichever is the lower, and/or an imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3-5 years.Permitted Acts12.1.11 The CA has several provisions permitting certain acts which do not constitute copyright infringements. These acts are intended to strike a fair balance between the interest of copyright owners and the public interest. They include acts (popularly known as “fair dealings”) for the purposes of research and study, criticism or review, and reporting current events. To constitute fair dealing for research and study, not more than an article in a periodical or a reasonable proportion of a work (generally, 10% of the pages or a chapter) is to be taken, and the court is also to have regard to such factors as the nature of the work, the amount and substantiality of the part of the work that was copied in relation to the whole work as well as the effect on the potential market. In respect of fair dealing for criticism or review, or for reporting current events, there must also be a sufficient acknowledgement of the work.12.1.12 In addition, there are defences catering to a variety of more esoteric acts, such as• reproduction for purposes of judicial proceedings, professional advice or simulcast;• temporary, incidental or transient reproduction of a work as part of the technical process of making or receiving a communication;• observing, studying or testing the functioning of a computer program in order to determine the ideas and principles which underlie any element of the program;• incidental inclusion of a work in a film, television broadcast or cable programme; and• reading or recitation of an extract of a reasonable length from a published literary or dramatic work in public.Dealings in Copyright12.1.13 Being a property right, copyright can be licensed, assigned or otherwise transferred in a variety of ways. For instance, the copyright owner can license or assign the right to reproduce his work in a material form to one person and the right to perform the work in public to another person. He can also license or assign the copyright in terms of the whole or part of the copyright period or by geographical area. As a result, there can be a bewilderingly large number of licensees and/or owners of different parts of the copyright in a work.12.1.14 An assignment of copyright (whether total or partial) must be in writing and signed by or on behalf of the assignor (the copyright owner). An assignment can also be entered into in respect of copyright that has yet to come into existence, in which event the assignment will only be effective to transfer ownership of the copyright as soon as the work is created.12.1.15 A licence need not be in writing, although it is advisable that it should be so, especially in the case of an exclusive licence (see below). A licence which is not in writing does not bind subsequent assignees of the copyright except a bona fide purchaser for value who does not know of the licence. A licence may be exclusive or non-exclusive. An exclusive licence even excludes the licensor (i.e. the copyright owner) from doing whatever the licence permits – that is, the exclusive licensee is almost the owner of the copyright. Indeed, section 123 of the CA treats an exclusive licensee as the owner for many purposes connected with remedies, as it states that the rights and remedies of an exclusive licence are concurrent with those of the copyright owner.Remedies12.1.16 The range of remedies which the Court can order in infringement proceedings includes an injunction, either damages or an account of profits, an order for delivery up and/or disposal of infringing articles in relation to the copyright. In lieu of damages or an account of profits, the copyright owner can elect for an award of statutory damages, for which the court can grant not more than $10,000 for each work or subject matter in respect of which the copyright has been infringed but not more than $200,000 in the aggregate, unless the owner proves that his actual loss from such infringement exceeds $200,000. In awarding statutory damages, the court shall have regard to a number of factors, including• the nature and purpose of the infringing act (e.g. whether it was of a commercial nature);• the flagrancy of the infringement;• whether the defendant acted in bad faith;• any loss that the plaintiff has suffered or is likely to suffer by reason of the infringement; and• any benefit shown to have accrued to the defendant by reason of the infringement.Taken from http://www.singaporelaw.sg/content/iplaw2.html.whoa so detailed, yes sir i will follow........ seriously.
-
volgren bendies r possible, such as SBS999U (alr scrapped)
-
Originally posted by AEW5001:
volgren bendies r possible, such as SBS999U (alr scrapped)
SBS999U is not scrap , but sold to NZ , together with SBS998Y , in 2006
-
Originally posted by AEW5001:
volgren bendies r possible, such as SBS999U (alr scrapped)
U want SBS or SMRT one??? Clarify.... -
Originally posted by TWS4793:
If this really happens...
i will be happy to take this bus everyday at serangoon ave 1!LOL -
Time for me to make contribution to this thread?
8206 on sv21
-
Originally posted by Simple_boi:
Time for me to make contribution to this thread?
8206 on sv21
Its S12 rite? S21 doesn't pass by Simei Rd. -
Originally posted by ftjj0298:
Its S12 rite? S21 doesn't pass by Simei Rd.
he took that picture in pasir ris? -
Originally posted by ftjj0298:
Its S12 rite? S21 doesn't pass by Simei Rd.EDS tells all the story.....
-
Originally posted by service_238:
he took that picture in pasir ris?
Surely. Only Pasir Ris have those blue - white bus stops. -
An ad for 591L? LOL.
Pic not taken by me but from TWS but he sended me this pic after it was BNDEP SP and I decided to used it to make an ad but wanna tell him tat I used his pic but he is not online =.=.
And it took me a while to complete... -
Originally posted by bus555:
An ad for 591L? LOL.
Pic not taken by me but from TWS but he sended me this pic after it was BNDEP SP and I decided to used it to make an ad but wanna tell him tat I used his pic but he is not online =.=.
And it took me a while to complete...Interesting, but it might look better with more images. The Olympic games ad should look more attractive as this is a major event.
-
haha, isee the signal lights inverted!