SMRT New Euro-V Mercedes-Benz OC500LE WAB bus (Part 1)
-
Originally posted by Oceane:
Should be on S Shift... the duty code I had received from asking the rest was just simply unbelievable..
Alright. Thanks for the update.
Anyone knows how many S shift does Sv970 have?
-
Originally posted by dfs24:
SMB 1H on Sv970. Seen at Sixth Ave towards Bukit Panjang at approximately 5.50pm. Another unidentified OC500LE seen on Sv106 towards Bukit Batok at approximately 6.30pm at Clementi.
SMB2E on 106.Woah. All KJDEP OCs are on S-Shifts again today. SMB1H is on S-shift as well.
Anyway, 2 brand new OCs spotted inside KJDEP today, parked near maintainance bay.
-
7S is with AMDEP.
-
Originally posted by tintinspartan:
SMB2E on 106.Woah. All KJDEP OCs are on S-Shifts again today. SMB1H is on S-shift as well.
Anyway, 2 brand new OCs spotted inside KJDEP today, parked near maintainance bay.
Can you please stop snooping around KJDEP everytime and then trying to show off what you know. It's not as if we don't know...
And I believe you have not learnt your lesson not to be so busybody?
There is only a possibility of ONE new OC500LE, 6U. SMB 7S is under AMDEP, someone has spotted it appearing in Yishun areas.
-
Originally posted by Oceane:
Can you please stop snooping around KJDEP everytime and then trying to show off what you know. It's not as if we don't know...
And I believe you have not learnt your lesson not to be so busybody?
There is only a possibility of ONE new OC500LE, 6U. SMB 7S is under AMDEP, someone has spotted it appearing in Yishun areas.
Yup, around 2pm at Lentor towards Yishun direction. -
Originally posted by SBS2695H:
Redeployed to Service 970? If so, great thanks to KJDEP for doing so, as 970 is still a Chinatown Service, which make it possible for me to get a shot of it this coming Sunday while getting shots of F1 diverted Services (eg. 10) to Eu Tong Sen St. Not forgetting SMB 0004 A on Service 851.
It is just a CAMEO. Stop jumping to conclusion that it is redeployed. Don't act smart if you don't know. Don't talk if you are unsure. Talk wrongly get yourself infested by flaming posts. Worth it? Like it?Don't shame yourself in a public forum. Shut up or you set yourself ablaze.
-
Originally posted by dfs24:
Alright. Thanks for the update.
Anyone knows how many S shift does Sv970 have?
1H was rumoured to be on 970S102, should have replaced TIB 0809S...
-
Originally posted by sbs&tibs:
It is just a CAMEO. Stop jumping to conclusion that it is redeployed. Don't act smart if you don't know. Don't talk if you are unsure. Talk wrongly get yourself infested by flaming posts. Worth it? Like it?Don't shame yourself in a public forum. Shut up or you set yourself ablaze.
Well, you need a spark for the fuel.Please don't provide that.
-
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
Well, you need a spark for the fuel.Please don't provide that.
Bring if on if that's necessary. Otherwise I just sit and watch.Ok, back to topic.
-
Please don't let anger over such trivial matters cloud your judgement.
-
Originally posted by Oceane:
Can you please stop snooping around KJDEP everytime and then trying to show off what you know. It's not as if we don't know...
And I believe you have not learnt your lesson not to be so busybody?
There is only a possibility of ONE new OC500LE, 6U. SMB 7S is under AMDEP, someone has spotted it appearing in Yishun areas.
Note: I am not condoning nor condemning his actions, nor am I supportive or unsupportive of it. This is not directly targetted at Oceane either.
I honestly do not think he's trying to showoff looking at how the message was phrased...it's just information that he wants to share...don't see anything wrong in sharing information even though people may already know it - there are definitely people that may not know it. It's just that sometimes we may already know the information he has posted, yet someone else does not know. It's a little like, somebody asking another person, do you know that a certain event happened? If the person says no, then he goes on to respond to it, but if the person says yes, then he stops there or comments/discusses about it. We certainly cannot expect - as we all should know - the same to be done in an internet forum. In a forum, you're facing a wide audience of people, and I'm sure not everyone knows about this or that event, but there are certainly people whom already knows about it. Whilst this may appear irritating to people whom already know about it, it is still useful information about the event for people whom don't know.
However, as for credibility of the poster, I shan't comment on that, but neither do I see a reason to flame him in a public forum. It makes the victim and the perpetrator both look bad, and certainly doesn't create a good impression for a 3rd party who does not know anything about TTS nor the problems that happened before hand.
If he wants to snoop around KJDEP, we can only warn him not to (if there is a security risk or what-so-ever), but we cannot force him not to - it's his legs and not ours. If he gets caught for what-so-ever reason, it is definitely not our problem, but his problem. We have already warned him at hand, and if he refuses to heed the advice, there is nothing we can do about it. We can bring a horse to the river, but we cannot force the horse to drink.
I believe some of us also do the same (walk around, spot new buses, post them on the forum, etc etc, and if its something that some of us already know, we'd probably be more toned down than how we treat TTS).
As for busybody-ness, I've nothing to say.
-
Bingo!
Too bad not many see it this way.
And I don't have the energy to point that out.
-
Originally posted by n4l:
Note: I am not condoning nor condemning his actions, nor am I supportive or unsupportive of it. This is not directly targetted at Oceane either.
I honestly do not think he's trying to showoff looking at how the message was phrased...it's just information that he wants to share...don't see anything wrong in sharing information even though people may already know it - there are definitely people that may not know it. It's just that sometimes we may already know the information he has posted, yet someone else does not know. It's a little like, somebody asking another person, do you know that a certain event happened? If the person says no, then he goes on to respond to it, but if the person says yes, then he stops there or comments/discusses about it. We certainly cannot expect - as we all should know - the same to be done in an internet forum. In a forum, you're facing a wide audience of people, and I'm sure not everyone knows about this or that event, but there are certainly people whom already knows about it. Whilst this may appear irritating to people whom already know about it, it is still useful information about the event for people whom don't know.
However, as for credibility of the poster, I shan't comment on that, but neither do I see a reason to flame him in a public forum. It makes the victim and the perpetrator both look bad, and certainly doesn't create a good impression for a 3rd party who does not know anything about TTS nor the problems that happened before hand.
If he wants to snoop around KJDEP, we can only warn him not to (if there is a security risk or what-so-ever), but we cannot force him not to - it's his legs and not ours. I believe some of us also do the same (walk around, spot new buses, post them on the forum, etc etc, and if its something that some of us already know, we'd probably be more toned down than how we treat TTS).
As for busybody-ness, I've nothing to say.
He should only post things that are correct, not things that are always wrong.
-
Originally posted by Oceane:
He should only post things that are correct, not things that are always wrong.
I'm surprised some of you guys never get tired of shooting wrong info down with the biggest missiles you could fire.You don't get tired of it, but there are many people like me who will eventually.
-
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
I'm surprised some of you guys never get tired of shooting wrong info down with the biggest missiles you could fire.You don't get tired of it, but there are many people like me who will eventually.
Not posting anything is better than posting something which is wrong.But still, I don't really care much about TTS anyway. His best ability is to always get the wrong info.
-
Originally posted by Oceane:
He should only post things that are correct, not things that are always wrong.
Credibility of the OP is another case
. It's a case by case judgement based on the content of the posts. I'm confident that TTS will learn his lesson sooner or later himself. But I really think he does need to make sure that he states that he is speculating clearly.All fans like to speculate about what they like - it's in our nature. Be it fans of a certain pop-singer, or people whom are extremely interested in politics. They will speculate, but I personally feel that this is a line that has to be drawn clearly, instead of posting it such that it sounds like as if it was actual, confirmed information. Chatting/disseminating information over text is different as to communiating face-to-face in person.
-
Originally posted by n4l:
Note: I am not condoning nor condemning his actions, nor am I supportive or unsupportive of it. This is not directly targetted at Oceane either.
I honestly do not think he's trying to showoff looking at how the message was phrased...it's just information that he wants to share...don't see anything wrong in sharing information even though people may already know it - there are definitely people that may not know it. It's just that sometimes we may already know the information he has posted, yet someone else does not know. It's a little like, somebody asking another person, do you know that a certain event happened? If the person says no, then he goes on to respond to it, but if the person says yes, then he stops there or comments/discusses about it. We certainly cannot expect - as we all should know - the same to be done in an internet forum. In a forum, you're facing a wide audience of people, and I'm sure not everyone knows about this or that event, but there are certainly people whom already knows about it. Whilst this may appear irritating to people whom already know about it, it is still useful information about the event for people whom don't know.
However, as for credibility of the poster, I shan't comment on that, but neither do I see a reason to flame him in a public forum. It makes the victim and the perpetrator both look bad, and certainly doesn't create a good impression for a 3rd party who does not know anything about TTS nor the problems that happened before hand.
If he wants to snoop around KJDEP, we can only warn him not to (if there is a security risk or what-so-ever), but we cannot force him not to - it's his legs and not ours. If he gets caught for what-so-ever reason, it is definitely not our problem, but his problem. We have already warned him at hand, and if he refuses to heed the advice, there is nothing we can do about it. We can bring a horse to the river, but we cannot force the horse to drink.
I believe some of us also do the same (walk around, spot new buses, post them on the forum, etc etc, and if its something that some of us already know, we'd probably be more toned down than how we treat TTS).
As for busybody-ness, I've nothing to say.
I strongly believe that a bus fan shouldn't behave until so extreme like to camp outside depot and look around for new buses. What would people say when they see that? Do you think that's a disgrace to bus fans? Can bus fans act normally? Yes right? Do you need to snoop outside a depot behaving so suspiciously? That doesn't leave us bus fans a good impression. -
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
I'm surprised some of you guys never get tired of shooting wrong info down with the biggest missiles you could fire.You don't get tired of it, but there are many people like me who will eventually.
I am. Quite tired of seeing TTS being flamed in public. Been wanting to point this out but never had the time to...
-
Originally posted by sbs&tibs:
I strongly believe that a bus fan shouldn't behave until so extreme like to camp outside depot and look around for new buses. What would people say when they see that? Do you think that's a disgrace to bus fans? Can bus fans act normally? Yes right? Do you need to snoop outside a depot behaving so suspiciously? That doesn't leave us bus fans a good impression.
Your belief is yours to keep.His dream is his reality to wish.
You need to draw a line for that.
Why are you so agitated over his behavior? Don't you think it indicates insecurity within yourself? has that occured to you?
-
Originally posted by sbs&tibs:
I strongly believe that a bus fan shouldn't behave until so extreme like to camp outside depot and look around for new buses. What would people say when they see that? Do you think that's a disgrace to bus fans? Can bus fans act normally? Yes right? Do you need to snoop outside a depot behaving so suspiciously? That doesn't leave us bus fans a good impression.I do agree with your viewpoint. However, there are extremists in all cases of idolism - for example, the girl who went so crazy over Andy Lau that she wanted to kill herself because she couldn't meet him (or something along those lines, happened a year back or so). Does it make it seem like as though everyone started thinking "hey, all Andy Lau fans are crazy"? :) Or if you want to push something closer to transport - there was this train fan in NYC who went to the extent of stealing train keys and even impersonating train officals!
However TTS wants to present himself to others is his problem. But I do see that there are times when his posts are alright in tone, it's just that we already have a prejudice towards him and thus we take it in a negative light - maybe we could change this, and look at his posts from another point of view. There is no need to get angry nor agitated over it. Why bother about him? In every group, there are bound to be black sheeps, you can't expect a bed of roses =)
He'll tone down his actions sooner or later, when he grows up. As for ourselves, let's keep ourselves in check and give others a good impression of us (i.e. when we're joyriding on new buses, please - keep quiet for the sake of the other passengers. There's no need to announce that you know 171s timetable to the world over the phone).
Do note that I do not know the connections (i.e. who's friends with TTS and who's not and stuff) in the forum. I only know a handful of people (I can probably count it with 1 hand) as I don't bother meeting up.
-
Originally posted by sbs&tibs:
I strongly believe that a bus fan shouldn't behave until so extreme like to camp outside depot and look around for new buses. What would people say when they see that? Do you think that's a disgrace to bus fans? Can bus fans act normally? Yes right? Do you need to snoop outside a depot behaving so suspiciously? That doesn't leave us bus fans a good impression.pls lar. different people have different characteristics. do you expect other people to change just to suit yourself? think properly.
-
Originally posted by n4l:
As for busybody-ness, I've nothing to say.
There's many sickening behaviour I've experienced, sneaking, stalking, spying, peeking...what else? -
Originally posted by ngjy22:
There's many sickening behaviour I've experienced, sneaking, stalking, spying, peeking...what else?
The solution?Poking.
-
Originally posted by ngjy22:
There's many sickening behaviour I've experienced, sneaking, stalking, spying, peeking...what else?Of him?
That I honestly do not know...hehe. But it really does depend on the context when he sneaks/stalks/peeks/spys/whatever. I don't know what he does irl, nor am I really bothered to find out - thus I can't say anything about this without assuming and being prejudiced. Assuming is bad =D
Cheers! Going out now, will be back by twelve to reply if there's a need to.
16/f/lonely, glad I have someone that shares the same feeling as I do =).
-
Originally posted by TIB1018B:
Deploying Merc OC500LEs on service 854 will be good as it can compete with the Volvo B9TLs on service 25 and also the demand for service 854 is high.More like to satisfy your wants....almost every service in Fernvale must have a new bus...the only service which you have not commented on is 103.