Originally posted by Oceane:151 ah... hardly any WAB demand...
Service 151 somemore sends out perm K230UBs and gets perm MK4 DMs in return (8092H and 8099P's case) ![]()
Originally posted by scaniaB7RLE:OFF topic but...: rapid penang ordering scania buses for extra fleet.
link: www.automotive-business-review.com/article_news.asp?guid=207976F2-1C64-468E-9739-4ADF55DF5478
Gemaling body? I wonder how the buses looks like in Rapid Penang livery
.
Originally posted by SMB32T:
Gemaling body? I wonder how the buses looks like in Rapid Penang livery.
u can perform a simple google image search.
Originally posted by xXxJaylenxXx:Hmm i took SBS8532E on Svc 21 for ytd and today morning. Around 6.40am it will reach Geylang.
lol I think full day. Saw it that day after sch oso.
I wonder why most of the HGDEP K230UB got the paint frm the handrail fallen off? Especially at the entrance door? is it because of the cleaner?
Originally posted by SBS8533C:possibly service 38, 139, 145, 372, 518, current WAB svc, etc..
dont forget 292 and other feeder svc...hahaha...no jokes, got elderly eh.
Originally posted by bus555:i find tampines int has one one WAb svc and that is 72 (Somemore an AMDEP svc)
maybe the upgrade of tam int has something to do with the WAB piw thinky?
true... i think more WAB svc after will be intro aft tamp int upgrade.
Originally posted by scaniaB7RLE:dont forget 292 and other feeder svc...hahaha...no jokes, got elderly eh.
lolx? u wan WLL haha
Originally posted by scaniaB7RLE:dont forget 292 and other feeder svc...hahaha...no jokes, got elderly eh.
Please STOP insisting that Service 292 will get Scania KUB. Whether or not SBST wants to give Service 292 KUB we will never know. So STOP saying Service X will or will not get KUB. If not everyone here will start to say and guess things like that.
Originally posted by SBS2695H:
Please STOP insisting that Service 292 will get Scania KUB. Whether or not SBST wants to give Service 292 KUB we will never know. So STOP saying Service X will or will not get KUB. If not everyone here will start to say and guess things like that.
den u dont join forum. easy. i nvr say 'want' i say 'probably'. catch no ball ?
Originally posted by scaniaB7RLE:true... i think more WAB svc after will be intro aft tamp int upgrade.
I really wonder what the relevant authorities are doing with Tampines Interchange.
True TP Int needs a revamp. And an expansion. The funny thing is, from what I heard, TP Int is going to be pulled down to make room for ERL development(the station or rails or whatever thingy supposed). They should just relocate TP Int by rebuilding an entirely new facility at Tampines Concourse/Grande(stupid name, yeah I know)...
But anyway, since there is currently a revamp of TP Int(which they possibly are going to pull down sometime in the future, wasting taxpayers money), they should add berths(I call them slots) at between the 18/28/38 and 23 berths... Which is somewhere near the ex-SBST service office.
Originally posted by Fryderyk HPH:I really wonder what the relevant authorities are doing with Tampines Interchange.
True TP Int needs a revamp. And an expansion. The funny thing is, from what I heard, TP Int is going to be pulled down to make room for ERL development(the station or rails or whatever thingy supposed). They should just relocate TP Int by rebuilding an entirely new facility at Tampines Concourse/Grande(stupid name, yeah I know)...
But anyway, since there is currently a revamp of TP Int(which they possibly are going to pull down sometime in the future, wasting taxpayers money), they should add berths(I call them slots) at between the 18/28/38 and 23 berths... Which is somewhere near the ex-SBST service office.
i agree. why at the current location?
Originally posted by sbs8104h:
i agree. why at the current location?
Huh?
Anyways IMHO TP Int is a big joke... It is an absolute mess rite now[rush hour is ****]. The contract developer actually wanted to do 2 ~ 3 berths refurbishing at one time. Look at what it led to...
TP int is in a big mess. i dare not go there le
Originally posted by scaniaB7RLE:dont forget 292 and other feeder svc...hahaha...no jokes, got elderly eh.
Sv. 292 needs more demand. If only it was rerouted to ply more traffic along Tp Ave 7, changing it to townlink service.
Originally posted by SinkTel:
Yea. Only a matter of time for all CGA services to be certified WAB. Hmm, 25 cant be WAB because of the place it parks at Bedok Int, same case for 88 for its parking at Toa Payoh Int? Pardon me if i'm wrong.
I think sv 88 can't be a wab svc because of the weird b-stop style in the east side. eg. like punggol rd that area.
Originally posted by Stage:I think sv 88 can't be a wab svc because of the weird b-stop style in the east side. eg. like punggol rd that area.
punggol rd I can say is the bus-stop bef St Anne ch (twd tpy aka my church that i have for classes :D)
Originally posted by SMB32T:All SBST airport services should be WAB
.
Service 100 should have already became WAB but due to the constraints at the parking berth at Serangoon Interchange. Same for service 25 at Bedok Interchange.
Think maybe service 163 might get WAB too. Noticed that some bus stops along Fernvale recently got upgraded with ramps being built to the housing estates. Service 119 should also gets WAB too as it loops at Kovan Hub
.
For SMRT services to be WAB, maybe services 67, 171, 172, 189, 307, 811, 851, 854...
163 quite likely i must say. The bus stops *seem* to be WAB possible.
SMRT svcs i agree with 307, 811, 851. But I feel they should get more OC500s or other WAB models first before getting a WAB svc.
Originally posted by Stage:I think sv 88 can't be a wab svc because of the weird b-stop style in the east side. eg. like punggol rd that area.
Along St 22 there are many bus stops that are WAB ready...you can see the wheelchair sign ![]()
Originally posted by n4l:Along St 22 there are many bus stops that are WAB ready...you can see the wheelchair sign
maybe for sv52 or sv13 ne? ![]()
i think sv13 likelier bah.
Originally posted by jayh272416:
maybe for sv52 or sv13 ne?i think sv13 likelier bah.
52 not likely...bets on 13 too..
Originally posted by Stage:I think sv 88 can't be a wab svc because of the weird b-stop style in the east side. eg. like punggol rd that area.
Its Toa Payoh interchange that is posing the problem unless they change berth. The building structure where the stairs is located is not wide enough for a wheelchair to go thru...
This is what happen when the PIW boarding is at the exit door
Originally posted by Fryderyk HPH:Sv. 292 needs more demand. If only it was rerouted to ply more traffic along Tp Ave 7, changing it to townlink service.
demands in terms of ppl or buses? but smtimes, the bus can get pack during aft peak hrs.
Originally posted by n4l:Along St 22 there are many bus stops that are WAB ready...you can see the wheelchair sign
all 6 stops along bsh st 22 should be wab alr...
Originally posted by service_238:
Its Toa Payoh interchange that is posing the problem unless they change berth. The building structure where the stairs is located is not wide enough for a wheelchair to go thru...This is what happen when the PIW boarding is at the exit door
Now I understand. another example would be BC's having difficulty checking if the berth behind the whole slab of wall is empty. Had a lot of encounters where BC's turn in to sv 159's berth even though the 88 berth is empty. But I think the berth closer to sv 8 is wab?