Originally posted by off_service:Suspected swop of buses between 67 and 167:
SMB 34 M -> 167
SMB 46 D -> 67
But 167 won't get any of the OC perms anymore, jus cameo onli to replace the missing buses.
Originally posted by SBS9364S:
But 167 won't get any of the OC perms anymore, jus cameo onli to replace the missing buses.
You are giving me the impression that SMRT had put the 2 OCs to replace 2 OCs that supposedly went SP, with one perm that went SP and come back to cameo for a prolonged period.
34M and 47B has been on 167 for at least 4 days to a week. Ever since tintinspartan said about the advertisement issue, the 2 affected buses (TIB 918 K and TIB 920 C) have been on other slots, with the 2 OCs still on AM/PM 01 and 02.
Changes in any decisions can be made without us knowing. Unless someone can present any official source, I would rather believe my own eyes for now.
Originally posted by SBS8533C:SBS631E is BNDEP 292 perm, not SP.
replaced the Missing bus slot?
Deleted
Originally posted by BusSpeeder:they had to swap SBS2790R over
about time.
Originally posted by Scania N113CRB l0v3r:
replaced the Missing bus slot?
2824C is still BB SP
May I know who edited SGWiki that SBS900 is BNDEP 9/566?
Originally posted by SBS8033D:May I know who edited SGWiki that SBS900 is BNDEP 9/566?
Originally posted by SBS8033D:May I know who edited SGWiki that SBS900 is BNDEP 9/566?
.... i thot perm long time ago -.-?
Originally posted by SBS8533C:SBS3909K is SLBP 79 perm
fleet addition?
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
fleet addition?
Replace 526B.
BTW can anyone confirms that whether SBS2752B is out of Svc 123?
Originally posted by chikopek:BTW can anyone confirms that whether SBS2752B is out of Svc 123?
still perm for now.
Originally posted by Oceane:
Replace 526B.
Look at sgwiki, seems redundant of putting restricted access.
It happens that there are 3 OS-Shifts on 911. The first one is TIB1225U (911E/963) which was added last year in between TIB1139K and TIB465A. The second one was TIB525K (911E/169A) which is in between TIB465A and TIB868X.
The third one which was on the route since I was Sec 1 is actually a 911E/169 (timesheet is 169AM52). This bus is being deployed in between TIB868X and TIB1032J and would depart from WRI on its first trip on 911E at aprrox 6.40am to 6:50am. This timeslot would use any rigids from WLDEP, although bendies have appeared (but rarely; only seen once).
Originally posted by chickenlittle2:
Look at sgwiki, seems redundant of putting restricted access.
If you think you can do a better job then notify the admins loh. I've already told one admin that I won't really want to be SysOps because I don't really have alot of time to edit this edit that everyday. Besides I gave up on SGWiki long ago...
Originally posted by Oceane:
If you think you can do a better job then notify the admins loh. I've already told one admin that I won't really want to be SysOps because I don't really have alot of time to edit this edit that everyday. Besides I gave up on SGWiki long ago...
I am not trying to ask for an admin account here. I just feel that it is useless for that. It is redundant when the list can be undo for changes.
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:it looks like SBS9496U keeping sticking on to 179/179A since 16 Jan but no records of 9496 cameoing other svcs after that date. is that tempoary replacement for 9365P till it is out from layup?
any update on 9496U perm status?
and anyone got saw SBS9066C on 98 or any other SLBP svcs recently? it is like missing for 3 months alrdy
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:and anyone got saw SBS9066C on 98 or any other SLBP svcs recently? it is like missing for 3 months alrdy
awaiting spares?
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
any update on 9496U perm status?and anyone got saw SBS9066C on 98 or any other SLBP svcs recently? it is like missing for 3 months alrdy
I have boarded 9496U twice, once on a weekday, once on a Saturday. At both times, it was driven by the former 9365P driver if I am not mistaken.
179 rarely has cameos on weekends. The fact that 9496U has done 179 on a Saturday before tells us that it is perm on the service to an extent.
The reason why I said to an extent is because there is no perm sticker inside the bus; there is no 179 or SP sticker, only the now irrelevant old and torn 111 sticker.
9496U (SL SP) --> (temp SL 179)?