PTC QoS report card for PTOs for Jun to Nov '08
-
Originally posted by SBS555S:
wat SBS SBST $100 SMRT $4000 plus
Scania N113CRB l0v3r, dun post rubbish if u dun know anything
hi andrew.
-
Services that failed to achieve 85% of trips departing within 5 mins of scheduled headway:
SBST: 36, 57, 229
SMRT: NILServices that failed the maximum 95% loadings:
SBST: 7, 8, 10, 16, 21, 28, 58, 59, 90, 97, 145, 196, 198, 246, 254, 255
SMRT: 925Source: http://www.ptc.gov.sg/news29.pdf
-
dats an approx fine of $236.84 per svc for all the SBST svcs..
-
Originally posted by off_service:
Services that failed to achieve 85% of trips departing within 5 mins of scheduled headway:
SBST: 36, 57, 229
SMRT: NILServices that failed the maximum 95% loadings:
SBST: 7, 8, 10, 16, 21, 28, 58, 59, 90, 97, 145, 196, 198, 246, 254, 255
SMRT: 925Source: http://www.ptc.gov.sg/news29.pdf
57 ah
im surprised 246 254 255 failed maximum loading.
-
Originally posted by SBS555S:
wat SBS SBST $100 SMRT $4000 plus
Scania N113CRB l0v3r, dun post rubbish if u dun know anything
shut up. -
Seems to me that SMRTB is better at ensuring peak hour loading does not exceed 95%. Hope its true, unless the PTC did not check SMRTB's peak hour loading thoroughly. But then its rather surprising that there does not seem to be any improvement made to Service 925.
Other than that, I am very very surprised why Service 980 was not blacklisted for failing the maximum 95% loading on sundays. Just simply because it happpens during Sundays and not weekdays peak hours? This is not a good reason for the PTC to overlook Service 980's situation on Sundays.
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
57 ah
im surprised 246 254 255 failed maximum loading.
New BLE sabo them. SBST sure complain SMRT. lol. -
Originally posted by off_service:
Services that failed to achieve 85% of trips departing within 5 mins of scheduled headway:
SBST: 36, 57, 229
SMRT: NILServices that failed the maximum 95% loadings:
SBST: 7, 8, 10, 16, 21, 28, 58, 59, 90, 97, 145, 196, 198, 246, 254, 255
SMRT: 925Source: http://www.ptc.gov.sg/news29.pdf
Once again, I see the same Service 28 being blacklisted for failing the maximum 95% loadings when it is obvious that the problem might be solved with a full double deck fleet but apprently there does not seem to be any improvement made since the previous report. -
Originally posted by off_service:
Services that failed to achieve 85% of trips departing within 5 mins of scheduled headway:
SBST: 36, 57, 229
SMRT: NILServices that failed the maximum 95% loadings:
SBST: 7, 8, 10, 16, 21, 28, 58, 59, 90, 97, 145, 196, 198, 246, 254, 255
SMRT: 925Source: http://www.ptc.gov.sg/news29.pdf
Not surprised 7 didn't make it. Everytime from Orchard to Clementi, without a double deck, the bus usually reject passengers from Cineleisure onwards. This is considering the fact that I was on a KUB. Maybe full fleet double deck is better for 7.
-
Originally posted by SBS9364S:
If overcapacity, there'll lead to accident and the bus won't work properly.Off-topic: This is the main reason why BBDEP don't intend to put striders to replace MK3 on 160/170 at the end of Nov, and put DM3500s instead. Coz DM3500s have larger capacity than striders.
Totally invalid.
-
Originally posted by SBS9364S:
If overcapacity, there'll lead to accident and the bus won't work properly.Off-topic: This is the main reason why BBDEP don't intend to put striders to replace MK3 on 160/170 at the end of Nov, and put DM3500s instead. Coz DM3500s have larger capacity than striders.
Totally invalid.
-
Originally posted by TIB958U:
Seems to me that SMRTB is better at ensuring peak hour loading does not exceed 95%. Hope its true, unless the PTC did not check SMRTB's peak hour loading thoroughly. But then its rather surprising that there does not seem to be any improvement made to Service 925.
Other than that, I am very very surprised why Service 980 was not blacklisted for failing the maximum 95% loading on sundays. Just simply because it happpens during Sundays and not weekdays peak hours? This is not a good reason for the PTC to overlook Service 980's situation on Sundays.
Actually 980 had no problem... Until SMRT decides to remove most of the bendies for Sundays.
-
Originally posted by dfs24:
Not surprised 7 didn't make it. Everytime from Orchard to Clementi, without a double deck, the bus usually reject passengers from Cineleisure onwards. This is considering the fact that I was on a KUB. Maybe full fleet double deck is better for 7.
is it still that crowded at night on both directions? ;)
-
Originally posted by TIB958U:
Once again, I see the same Service 28 being blacklisted for failing the maximum 95% loadings when it is obvious that the problem might be solved with a full double deck fleet but apprently there does not seem to be any improvement made since the previous report.actually i feel sv28 should just improve the freq. In fact i feel sv28 should full SD with a freq of about 4-5 min. The roads in tampines are rather narrow and may not be really suitable for DD.
-
Originally posted by TIB958U:
Seems to me that SMRTB is better at ensuring peak hour loading does not exceed 95%. Hope its true, unless the PTC did not check SMRTB's peak hour loading thoroughly. But then its rather surprising that there does not seem to be any improvement made to Service 925.
Other than that, I am very very surprised why Service 980 was not blacklisted for failing the maximum 95% loading on sundays. Just simply because it happpens during Sundays and not weekdays peak hours? This is not a good reason for the PTC to overlook Service 980's situation on Sundays.
There you've got it. But then, nobody really cares about Sundays. It's not like people will be late for work or school on Sundays.
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
57 ah
im surprised 246 254 255 failed maximum loading.
36 should be due to orchard road + jumpbus. drivers must wait for the next bus to arrive then they can move off. if the next bus is late, their departure will also be late.
jurong west is a tricky place to provide bus services anyway. -
Originally posted by TIB958U:
Other than that, I am very very surprised why Service 980 was not blacklisted for failing the maximum 95% loading on sundays. Just simply because it happpens during Sundays and not weekdays peak hours? This is not a good reason for the PTC to overlook Service 980's situation on Sundays.
I have recently noticed many bendies on service 980 contributed by both AMDEP and WLDEP on Sundays. They are trying to improve the service......
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
36 should be due to orchard road + jumpbus. drivers must wait for the next bus to arrive then they can move off. if the next bus is late, their departure will also be late.
jurong west is a tricky place to provide bus services anyway.thats why i keep suggesting 36 go down to Bukit Merah or something. At least dun have to jump. den control xfer to ARBP.
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
jurong west is a tricky place to provide bus services anyway.
by what means? -
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
jurong west is a tricky place to provide bus services anyway.
imo its rather ok. just route the indusrial services in rounds
see 192 193 257. go quite a *ahem* distance before they actually hit industrial -
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
by what means?
no need explain mah.... boon lay is the busiest interchange in Singapore.
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
no need explain mah.... boon lay is the busiest interchange in Singapore.
it will be pwnage if many buses "spamming" for parking lots at S shift hours(peak).a lot of traffic jams inside bnl int, if got accident or breakdown, imagine how worse it is.
-
Originally posted by SBS7322B:
I have recently noticed many bendies on service 980 contributed by both AMDEP and WLDEP on Sundays. They are trying to improve the service......
Many of these bendies are on TQ shift.
-
I find these findings are rather rubbish. How can Sv190 pass the loading criteria?????? Anyone care to explain?
-
No of pax divided by licenced capacity.... just go count the number of pax for each bus.