Alighting berths not enough at Pasir Ris Int?
-
Originally posted by ak4711:
That would make it confusing den wont it? :D
agreed. I am sure people will get confused. It is good that the 3 that is heading to Punggol is stopping Outside the interchange. However, if they want it both to stop at PSR int, can but separate berths.
-
issue is more of sheltered links
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
seems tat place is now a recruits corner before they board e bus back to P. Tekong.
However it ends up with only 1 alighting berth left for SBS buses, resulting some to use Sv 5, 12, 403, 518's berth for alighting instead
hopefully e Int can be expanded
LTA's call.
-
I ever saw this happened bef
Tekong bus at e berth, 2 SBS bus queueing to alight passengers at T Link office and Sv 5's berth. End up those buses leaving e bus park unable to pick up passengers as scheduled as exit tio blocked
-
Originally posted by ak4711:
That would make it confusing den wont it? :D
358 west 358 east 359 west 359 east not confusing meh
just call it 3 west and 3 east lah. similar to 357 west 357 east
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
358 west 358 east 359 west 359 east not confusing meh
just call it 3 west and 3 east lah. similar to 357 west 357 east
If it's intra-town can call that, but it's between towns so cannot :D
-
Originally posted by ak4711:
If it's intra-town can call that, but it's between towns so cannot :D
ok lor
3 3
and
PUNGGOL TAMPINEScan?
-
Some ppl blind never see the punngol and tampines mah. :D
Thing is, it's okay for 3 towards punggol to be outside interchange because it saves time and in the bigger picture, fuel.
I've taken 3 all my life and always ppl go straight to inter to take the one to tampines, why? Because convienient, and got shelter, so cannot kick 3 out. -
Why not 59 stop inside TPY and have 2 separate Berths. Might as well withdraw 231
-
Originally posted by sbs8104h:
Why not 59 stop inside TPY and have 2 separate Berths. Might as well withdraw 231
cuz it wasnt planned that way.
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
cuz it wasnt planned that way.
i know that.
-
Originally posted by ak4711:
Some ppl blind never see the punngol and tampines mah. :D
Thing is, it's okay for 3 towards punggol to be outside interchange because it saves time and in the bigger picture, fuel.
I've taken 3 all my life and always ppl go straight to inter to take the one to tampines, why? Because convienient, and got shelter, so cannot kick 3 out.The reason why Service 3 calls Pasir Ris Int because it was meant to serve ex-357's route. In order not to cause inconvienience ex-357's regular, service 3 will call inside Pasir Int towards Tampines.
Feeders serves a purpose, by making a trunk service to take over a feeder service. The operating hours of the service must be extended to end after the last train depart that station.
-
Originally posted by Fryderyk HPH:
No no no, not Overhead bridge. Just a sheltered covered path across the traffic light(which must be 4.5m of coz) then to the BS opp. Not as costly as an overhead bridge. Why need overhead bridge when there is already a traffic light.
I don't think it is economic wise to build a shelter just for service 3. I rather they use the money to do something to the interchange. It's very chaotic during weekends.
-
Originally posted by sbs8104h:
can be done. Let 1 Berth reserved for the Army guys going to Pulau Tekong and another for Bus.
cheap talk. you've never seen 3's loading at psr.
-
these buses should pick people up outside the interchange, prolly at the bus stop outside white sands.
-
Originally posted by .SBS9888Y.:
these buses should pick people up outside the interchange, prolly at the bus stop outside white sands.
Their alighting point I noticed is Sv 3's central stop (Towards St 71). again, it's a feeder central stop -
Originally posted by .SBS9888Y.:
cheap talk. you've never seen 3's loading at psr.
read wat e post is about... -
Originally posted by .SBS9888Y.:
these buses should pick people up outside the interchange, prolly at the bus stop outside white sands.
The Tekong shuttle boarding point should stay, there isn't any other sheltered area which recruits can assemble (ie fall in) without obstructing human traffic in the area. They have already tried to minimise the inconvienences caused to public bus passengers by making the buses set down at the Sv 3 bus stop, which is also the permstaff shuttle bus boarding and alighting point.
-
Originally posted by SBS 233 X:
I don't think it is economic wise to build a shelter just for service 3. I rather they use the money to do something to the interchange. It's very chaotic during weekends.
And the roof leaks too...
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
Their alighting point I noticed is Sv 3's central stop (Towards St 71). again, it's a feeder central stopNote: Sv. 3 is not a feeder, thus that cannot be called a "central stop".
-
too small and blocking ppl to board and alight and the design too louya
-
Originally posted by Tilldeath23:
too small and blocking ppl to board and alight and the design too louya
The layout of the Interchange itself is no good...
-
Originally posted by Fryderyk HPH:
Note: Sv. 3 is not a feeder, thus that cannot be called a "central stop".
Sv 3 came from e merger of Sv 294 & 357 -
Originally posted by sbst275:
Sv 3 came from e merger of Sv 294 & 357Still doesn't mean it's a feeder, and 357 did not extend to Punggol, so it cannot be called a feeder, a pure trunk.
-
Originally posted by ak4711:
Still doesn't mean it's a feeder, and 357 did not extend to Punggol, so it cannot be called a feeder, a pure trunk.
isn't e route inside Tampines & Pasir Ris New Town based on Sv 294 & 357's route?