CCL Bus Rationalisation
-
Originally posted by TIB537B:
i remember some article saying CCL's a lower capacity shuttle metro of sorts, so that's why it's 3 cars. may have remembered the wrong terms or the wrong words, but it's something like this. =\It is three cars becaus the full line is yet to open. The line will be operated by cars with 4 cabs when it fully opens.
3 cabs now because of limited numbers of stations. Bunch of noobs. Act smart not smart
-
Originally posted by TIB537B:
i remember some article saying CCL's a lower capacity shuttle metro of sorts, so that's why it's 3 cars. may have remembered the wrong terms or the wrong words, but it's something like this. =\
dunno labut imagine it's planned to serve One North, NUS, Pasir Panjang future PPT, Paya Lebar.. all e heavy corridor
-
Originally posted by TIB1010Y:
I predict tat the follow bus svc will b withdrawn due to parallel to CCL
24, 43, 80, maybe 93.
Most of SBS bus svc along CCL corridor (paya lebar area) will be affected most.
May be the follow bus svc will be affected?
22, 24, 43, 70, 70M, 76, 80, 135, 154, 155, 158
43, 70/70M, 76 will be intregated?
svc 22 from tampines - loop @ ubi?
MacPherson Svc to be rationalize?
Anymore affected?
SMRT svc does not affected at all, may b intro new svc? cos CCL is under SMRT=)
Might as well remove all the services???So clever try to tell me what 4D number will open on Wednesday leh
-
Originally posted by SBST390:
Don't all of you read the papers!!! Or too poor to buy???
Newspaper already mentioned no rationalisation for CCL, so why the thread. Or we have too many people jiak bah bo sai pang become keyboard fortune teller
it's only for CCL3.. there's a clause 'going forward, bus routes might be adjusted as the CCL goes fully operational'! -
Originally posted by n4l:
93 will go when the entire line opens.
if like tht happens, i hope tht the 2 CNG perm buses would come & be perm on svc 105..
-
Originally posted by SBST390:
It is three cars becaus the full line is yet to open. The line will be operated by cars with 4 cabs when it fully opens.
3 cabs now because of limited numbers of stations. Bunch of noobs. Act smart not smart
you sure it would be eventually be 4 cabs?only 40 x 3 trains has been ordered and delivered
-
Ano
Originally posted by SMRT BUSES LuvER:if like tht happens, i hope tht the 2 CNG perm buses would come & be perm on svc 105..
Another nincompoop. The gassies fuel tank do not allow for operations on 105 long term unless serangoon north CNG station can accomodate them -
Originally posted by TIB1010Y:
I predict tat the follow bus svc will b withdrawn due to parallel to CCL
24, 43, 80, maybe 93.
Most of SBS bus svc along CCL corridor (paya lebar area) will be affected most.
May be the follow bus svc will be affected?
22, 24, 43, 70, 70M, 76, 80, 135, 154, 155, 158
43, 70/70M, 76 will be intregated?
svc 22 from tampines - loop @ ubi?
MacPherson Svc to be rationalize?
Anymore affected?
SMRT svc does not affected at all, may b intro new svc? cos CCL is under SMRT=)
I think that the buses that will be withdrawn will be:
58, 158 & Some of the MacPherson Est Svc24 is not a possibly going to be withdrawn coz this service only serves 4 MRT station mainly, Bartley, Tai Seng, MacPherson, Paya Lebar. Furthermore, It is the only bus for passengers from Ang Mo Kio to get their groceries at Geylang Market or travel to Changi Airport. This bus service is very "ancient".
For 58, It currently have a low passenger demand during off-peak hours but not during peak hours. But one good thing about 58 is it caters to passengers who are from Ubi & Kaki Bukit to have an alternative service besides 55 & 59 respectively to get to Bishan. I have to say 50/50 for this service.
As for 158...I have no comments but it mainly caters to the School children mainly fron St Gabriel, Bartley, etc...I'm not so sure abt the demand....
Just my opinion only...you can leave ur opinion also...
-
Originally posted by SBST390:
Another nincompoop. The gassies fuel tank do not allow for operations on 105 long term unless serangoon north CNG station can accomodate them
Sv 105 alrdy has CNG based at SLBP -
Originally posted by sbst275:
you sure it would be eventually be 4 cabs?only 40 x 3 trains has been ordered and delivered
no such news that there will eventually be 4 cars -
Originally posted by SBST390:
Another nincompoop. The gassies fuel tank do not allow for operations on 105 long term unless serangoon north CNG station can accomodate themtell how come there are 5 of them perm on 105?
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
you sure it would be eventually be 4 cabs?only 40 x 3 trains has been ordered and delivered
Great. I like this... somebody is able to talk and quote sources. unlike the othe keyboard fortune tellers. This is the kind of constructive post we should all look to, not spamming threads to up post counts. -
Originally posted by SBST390:
It is three cars becaus the full line is yet to open. The line will be operated by cars with 4 cabs when it fully opens.
3 cabs now because of limited numbers of stations. Bunch of noobs. Act smart not smart
The rolling stock consists of Alstom Metropolis C830 trains[8] running in three-car formation -
Originally posted by SBST390:
Great. I like this... somebody is able to talk and quote sources. unlike the othe keyboard fortune tellers. This is the kind of constructive post we should all look to, not spamming threads to up post counts.
it has been mentioned nong ago abt being only 3 carriage -
Originally posted by SBST390:
Great. I like this... somebody is able to talk and quote sources. unlike the othe keyboard fortune tellers. This is the kind of constructive post we should all look to, not spamming threads to up post counts.whats your point here?
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
Sv 105 alrdy has CNG based at SLBPThat does not matter where it rests. Can you make it run A/P shift
-
based on e 40 trains ordered.. seems peak hr freq at most can only be 4 mins for CCL
-
Originally posted by SBST390:
That does not matter where it rests. Can you make it run A/P shift
it has always been S shift buses oweing to e cost -
Originally posted by jayh272416:
whats your point here?
What is the purpose of this thread?
Any bus rationalisation would have been announced by now for CCL3.
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
it has always been S shift buses oweing to e costCost of wad? come, i give you a chance to eat back your post first
-
Originally posted by SBST390:
Cost of wad? come, i give you a chance to eat back your post first
e cost of using CNG vs diesel to operate e fleet. it was mentioned in BT many yrs ago -
Originally posted by SBST390:
Great. I like this... somebody is able to talk and quote sources. unlike the othe keyboard fortune tellers. This is the kind of constructive post we should all look to, not spamming threads to up post counts.
Even though it is stated that there will be no rationalisation, but who knows in the near future?So , what's your post trying to say?
-
Originally posted by SBST390:
What is the purpose of this thread?
Any bus rationalisation would have been announced by now for CCL3.
um since when did this thread say CCL3? is there an invisible 3 in front?
i only see "CCL Bus Rationalisation".
-
Originally posted by TIB537B:
Even though it is stated that there will be no rationalisation, but who knows in the near future?So , what's your post trying to say?
based on TS first post, you sentence above already contradicts itself. -
Originally posted by SBST390:
based on TS first post, you sentence above already contradicts itself.
you said since when there's going to be rationalisation in e first placeOriginally posted by SBST390:Don't all of you read the papers!!! Or too poor to buy???
Newspaper already mentioned no rationalisation for CCL, so why the thread. Or we have too many people jiak bah bo sai pang become keyboard fortune teller