Spotted Svs 13, 105, 133, 153 with slightly lower loading
Suspect Sv 22, 24, 53, 135, 853 have some effects as well.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:it’s only the first day
CCL3 loading KO alrdy.. tis morning 0730 - 0800, bet Marymount - Bishan, S'goon - Bartley I ended up either e only passenger for e carriage or e entire train
mostly are NSL - NEL transit passengers or students at NYJC, SGSS.. even so, never did I see any carriage fully seated
Something positive.. wef today, Sv 315's final bus timing extended to 0040
the two ends of CCL nobody one.
mmm... reminds me, off peak ppl can switch to NSL upnorth easily... PM peak leh? ![]()
Originally posted by sbst275:
CCL3 loading KO alrdy.. tis morning 0730 - 0800, bet Marymount - Bishan, S'goon - Bartley I ended up either e only passenger for e carriage or e entire trainmostly are NSL - NEL transit passengers or students at NYJC, SGSS.. even so, never did I see any carriage fully seated
hmm... 3 cars only sia... dontknow why is not 6 cars cause it is passes lots of station comfirm got full demund I think
Originally posted by bus555:
hmm... 3 cars only sia... dontknow why is not 6 cars cause it is passes lots of station comfirm got full demund I think
wait till 2012 when fully ops lor
but I think SPH can't wait to make e line profitable liao
Originally posted by sbst275:
wait till 2012 when fully ops lorbut I think SPH can't wait to make e line profitable liao
huh what u means... i see all the 5 stations all with 3 cars PSD what?
Originally posted by bus555:
huh what u means... i see all the 5 stations all with 3 cars PSD what?
when CCL fully ops, maybe ridership would be better
but tis CCL3 might create a big hole for SMRT.. alrdy it's bus and taxi ops in e red
Originally posted by sbst275:mmm... reminds me, off peak ppl can switch to NSL upnorth easily... PM peak leh?
Should I say it's almost impossible to board north bound trains for some trips during evening peaks? Lol...
Bus operators should had expected it and amendment will be taking stage by stage so a mass confusion among aunties won't occur. Expect SMRT share price to rise :D
Originally posted by sbst275:Something positive.. wef today, Sv 315's final bus timing extended to 0040
Originally posted by ---Max---:Bus operators should had expected it and amendment will be taking stage by stage so a mass confusion among aunties won't occur. Expect SMRT share price to rise :D
there wun be bus svs changes to CCL3.. cos svs like 22 or 24 serves e heavy corridor Paya Lebar, it's just they pick up less pax at S'goon New Town side
I believe SMRT's profit would plunge for the next 5 yrs
Originally posted by Pangster:
Where did you get this info from? SBST boh bian, got to do this bcos they need to meet the last train timing at Serangoon. 410 nearly got affected also, I heard.
posters at S'goon Int, 315's berth
410 even so is like 315's case, additional extension by 10 mins
Originally posted by sbst275:
posters at S'goon Int, 315's berth410 even so is like 315's case, additional extension by 10 mins
Originally posted by Pangster:
u mean 410 also got last bus timing extended, posters up at bishan?
didn't touch Bishan Int's ground today
I'm just saying even if there's timing extn, it's just like 315's case.. by 10 mins
Originally posted by sbst275:
didn't touch Bishan Int's ground todayI'm just saying even if there's timing extn, it's just like 315's case.. by 10 mins
Originally posted by sbst275:
CCL3 loading KO alrdy.. tis morning 0730 - 0800, bet Marymount - Bishan, S'goon - Bartley I ended up either e only passenger for e carriage or e entire trainmostly are NSL - NEL transit passengers or students at NYJC, SGSS.. even so, never did I see any carriage fully seated
I would think the point of the CCL is for connecting all our current lines together without having to meet the (current) main interchanges...so the transit passengers...
Originally posted by sbst275:
when CCL fully ops, maybe ridership would be betterbut tis CCL3 might create a big hole for SMRT.. alrdy it's bus and taxi ops in e red
ST already reported that they are expected to make losses for 2 years straight...
Originally posted by n4l:ST already reported that they are expected to make losses for 2 years straight...
if you read e commentary, e mood is tat CCL3 wun be tat bad vs NEL
but seeing e current load esp if it remains aft 2 - 3 weeks, it's in for trouble
Originally posted by sbst275:Spotted Svs 13, 105, 133, 153 with slightly lower loading
Suspect Sv 22, 24, 53, 135, 853 have some effects as well.
i dont see how 13 153 133 853 135 24 22 be affected by CCL ?
Originally posted by sBs_boy:i dont see how 13 153 133 853 135 24 22 be affected by CCL ?
of course you cannot think out of e box
ppl at NYJC, SGSS can ditch 22, 24, 133, 135 for e MRT to get to AMK or even Yishun by ditching 853
Sv 13 say from Boon Keng to Bishan, now there's e MRT
Sv 153 is S'goon -> Toa Payoh.
but I wonder did wat I saw at 3pm over e student's travel pattern works for peak hrs since e NSL is alrdy so packed
Originally posted by sbst275:
of course you cannot think out of e boxppl at NYJC, SGSS can ditch 22, 24, 133, 135 for e MRT to get to AMK or even Yishun by ditching 853
Sv 13 say from Boon Keng to Bishan, now there's e MRT
Sv 153 is S'goon -> Toa Payoh.
Seriously, what you've mentioned is just based on students travelling patterns. Do u have actual figures to support ur claims ?Train to BIS then NSL to AMK ? I think bus is faster than train.
Nobody will take CCL > NSL to Toa Payoh from Serangoon. It simply makes no sense at all. Not only you have to make transfer and having to squeeze, u have to pay more. Most of the Serangoon Residents who go to Toa Payoh would only need to pay 69c.