i should say yes!
cus see the queue on 240 at Boon Lay Int on peak hours, its bad and every one need squeeze on single deck buses.
i dunnoe y they phased out?
actually svc 240 freq is gd..They got alternative like 30,154,246..
Originally posted by chickenlittle2:actually svc 240 freq is gd..They got alternative like 30,154,246..
to Boon Lay Gardens esp e Shopping Ctr tat's e only bus
Originally posted by sbst275:
to Boon Lay Gardens esp e Shopping Ctr tat's e only bus
246.
Originally posted by chickenlittle2:
246.
wa
take a joyride via Sime Darby, Meiji, Pokka, Jln Tukang, Taman Jurong before getting home at Boon Lay Gdns?
Originally posted by chickenlittle2:
246.
Go 1 round into Jurong Industrial area then go Boon Lay Shopping Ctr...![]()
Originally posted by sbst275:
watake a joyride via Sime Darby, Meiji, Pokka, Jln Tukang, Taman Jurong before getting home at Boon Lay Gdns?
NAC Fare ![]()
Originally posted by brotherchen1982:NAC Fare
still so ex as fare stage still running
theres the new Scanias which boasts higher capacity.. so no need DDs
Maybe SBST can revert back the CACs to NACs ![]()
Originally posted by sbst275:
watake a joyride via Sime Darby, Meiji, Pokka, Jln Tukang, Taman Jurong before getting home at Boon Lay Gdns?
alternative ma.. but svc 240 demand is inconsistant.. I see many taking Svc 198 and walk in.
Originally posted by Khairiano:i should say yes!
cus see the queue on 240 at Boon Lay Int on peak hours, its bad and every one need squeeze on single deck buses.
Feedback to SBST....
i doubt SBST will approve because there are some roads in Taman Jurong along 240 route which is too hard for VO3x to manoeuver in and out. so might be they want to deploy LO3x/VO3x, but the road constraint is reason that they cant able to do so.
I believe Kang Chin Rd has problems
maybe if 10.6m ADDs are in SBS's fleet
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:i doubt SBST will approve because there are some roads in Taman Jurong along 240 route which is too hard for VO3x to manoeuver in and out. so might be they want to deploy LO3x/VO3x, but the road constraint is reason that they cant able to do so.
i've taken a 240 VO2x last time.
Originally posted by .SBS9888Y.:i've taken a 240 VO2x last time.
VO3x=/=VO2x. VO3x has 2 rear axles while VO2x has only 1 rear axle.
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:i doubt SBST will approve because there are some roads in Taman Jurong along 240 route which is too hard for VO3x to manoeuver in and out. so might be they want to deploy LO3x/VO3x, but the road constraint is reason that they cant able to do so.
im assuming this means kang ching rd there isit?
Originally posted by jayh272416:im assuming this means kang ching rd there isit?
should be.. cuz Kang Ching Road is very narrow road.. and the juntion Kang Ching Road and Coporation Drive to0 narrow
Originally posted by jayh272416:im assuming this means kang ching rd there isit?
lolx"
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
VO3x=/=VO2x. VO3x has 2 rear axles while VO2x has only 1 rear axle.
so i guess VO2x =/= DD buses?
the thread name is Does Service 240 needs DD buses during peak hours?
not Does Service 240 needs VO3x during peak hours?
Originally posted by jayh272416:im assuming this means kang ching rd there isit?
the right turn from yuan ching to kang ching or the right turn from corporation dr to kang ching.
honestly if 28 can turn right at st 34 to st 32 with ease and with leylands, i dun see a problem with 240.
Originally posted by .SBS9888Y.:so i guess VO2x =/= DD buses?
the thread name is Does Service 240 needs DD buses during peak hours?
not Does Service 240 needs VO3x during peak hours?
The length of VO2x makes turning issue diff from ADDs
Originally posted by sbst275:
The length of VO2x makes turning issue diff from ADDs
yes i'm talking about introducing VO2x not VO3x.