Originally posted by Acx1688:Bro where u stay?! Tampines?! Pasir Ris?
Alternatively, take sv65 to Tekka tfr to sv23
i think 518 wld be much faster...
Originally posted by Acx1688:Finali withdrawn :)
yeah...and i nvr got a chance 2 take it :(
Originally posted by Tident:its fast! Checked the SBSTransit bus infor website this early morning for CityShoppers & page displayed ...
There is no bus by this service number found. Please enter another bus service number.Efficient?
Tried it using GPRS too... blanked out. But the bus stop sticker still there. (At least for 579)
Originally posted by SBS7382C:
yeah...and i nvr got a chance 2 take it :(
Bro, u din miss a tink... 2 expensive imo $3.60 anf 30mins frequency
Clown in the newspaper said dun mind paying SGD5.00 > she muz be insane! LOL
Originally posted by Acx1688:Bro, u din miss a tink... 2 expensive imo $3.60 anf 30mins frequency
Clown in the newspaper said dun mind paying SGD5.00 > she muz be insane! LOL
If SBS Transit is serious about increasing the demand for CiTYSHOPPER, the least they could do is to put up timetables AND ENSURE the next bus arrival timings could be found on those LTA next bus arrival boards xD.
Cityshoppers is a fake "Prada" that has its demise coming some day.
If fares is approx $2.50, maybe the Fernvale folks might be more willing to turn to 578. $3.40 like 2 trips of MRT/ trunk service. Too ex.
Anyway, I redeemed a trip on Cityshopper using a breakdown ticket ![]()
cityshoppers should have been withdrawn long ago. its average load is lesss than 10 per bus. i feel its unavoidable. you tell me how to make money.
A point form of why Cityshoppers met its demise:
Its $3.10 for 579 and $3.40 for the other 2 la.. eveyrone forgot there was a fare reduction?
Originally posted by service_238:Its $3.10 for 579 and $3.40 for the other 2 la.. eveyrone forgot there was a fare reduction?
$3.40 > chicken rice drumstick + 1 extra bowl of rice! :)
it would be good if 578 n 581 were combined n re-routed as an express svc instead..
Originally posted by AEW5001:it would be good if 578 n 581 were combined n re-routed as an express svc instead..
return 502 the portion that got cut off due to NEL and extend to puggol?
Originally posted by SBS 8030 L:A point form of why Cityshoppers met its demise:
- Too expensive. ($3.60 for 1 trip you tell me you want to take boh??)
- Waiting time too long. (1/2 hr per bus can bored to death)
- Some highly demand bus-stops at Orchard Rd it does not serve although due to that it cannot cater all the bus services in 1 bus stop.
- Operates on weekdays off-peak when it is obvious that there is almost no one who will shop for Luis Vuitton handbags and Nina Ricci perfumes etc @ Orchard during working days. (If operate on weekdays peak hours then i suppose that demand will be there.)
Just curious, do you think SBST will have forseen these to happen? They have been around for decades and shouldn't they expect this result in one way or another?
If I'm not wrong, Cityshopper services was introduced after Premium svcs was launched right? Could the success of Premium services initiated the launch of Cityshopper svcs back then?
Originally posted by SBS7382C:return 502 the portion that got cut off due to NEL and extend to puggol?
They wun do tt, i purposeli wrote to LTA to extend sv97 via ECP, Jln Eunos, Hougang Punggol, SHOT DOWN, they wan pple to make tfrs
I miss CityShopper 576 or 579. For 576 and 579, took about 30 min to reach home. For 518, It took about 1 hours. Double of the time and called this service EXPRESS.
I live in Pasir Ris.
hi guys,im doing a survey for my design and marketing stuff to verify some parts of consumer behavior
help me to fill the survey, i really need it.. Thanks :))
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=gqztrwbn2shwcad623817
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=m9c1awp8z2jycrd623959
Originally posted by Cece:hi guys,im doing a survey for my design and marketing stuff to verify some parts of consumer behavior
help me to fill the survey, i really need it.. Thanks :))
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=gqztrwbn2shwcad623817
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=m9c1awp8z2jycrd623959
Of all forums, not here please.
Originally posted by SBS_Bus_Fan:I miss CityShopper 576 or 579. For 576 and 579, took about 30 min to reach home. For 518, It took about 1 hours. Double of the time and called this service EXPRESS.
I live in Pasir Ris.
their express doesn't even feel like it's really express at all.
Originally posted by Stage:
their express doesn't even feel like it's really express at all.
waiting for LTA to give approval for buses to use KPE.... anyway at only 50% premium, surely cannot win cityshopper which charge a 100% premium ![]()
Originally posted by SBS8533C:To me, why ppl bother wasting money on CityShopper when there’s already trunk services plying along the Orchard Rd shopping belt and Suntec City area? That’s the reason why from 8 svcs initally, it was reduced to 4 and subsequently 3 at the end of 2008, and those CityShopper svcs do not really meet the adequate demand for the service since the day of introduction (if I can recall spotting CityShopper services on its 1st day at Dhoby Guaht MRT).
it came from an era on falling bus ridership. we won't be seeing any new services of such nature for a while to come now that the focus has shifted.
Originally posted by SBS8533C:To me, why ppl bother wasting money on CityShopper when there’s already trunk services plying along the Orchard Rd shopping belt and Suntec City area? That’s the reason why from 8 svcs initally, it was reduced to 4 and subsequently 3 at the end of 2008, and those CityShopper svcs do not really meet the adequate demand for the service since the day of introduction (if I can recall spotting CityShopper services on its 1st day at Dhoby Guaht MRT).
If you are using 1st day observation as a yardstick, your conclusion is very skewed.
All I got to say is IMO 579 is the most suscessful CiTYSHOPPER in terms of pax load.
579 Bus stops plates have been stickered over. Still can see the number unlike 576 where they pull out the sticker... zz...
Tribute to the final 3:


Originally posted by SBS1984E:All I got to say is IMO 579 is the most suscessful CiTYSHOPPER in terms of pax load.
579 Bus stops plates have been stickered over. Still can see the number unlike 576 where they pull out the sticker... zz...
eh, can u substantiate ur post w proof?! ie did u c sv579 during off peak hrs, the load is PATHETIC