[Photos of Buses] September 2009
-
Originally posted by BusSpeeder:
yes? evidence? you are not a mind reader. how do you know these people find joy in shooting others?
Its not that difficult to find them. Just mention "DAF" for a start.
-
Originally posted by sgbuses:
Its not that difficult to find them. Just mention "DAF" for a start.
does that mean some of the older bus fans are also "shooting" when they comment about other bus fans posting inferior photos? since "DAF" is also related to inferior photos posted by other bus fans.
-
The term "DAF" is a derogatory term that has been uttered so often that one wonders if the perpetuators actually derive orgasm from the act.
-
Originally posted by BusSpeeder:
1. does that mean some of the older bus fans are also "shooting" when they comment about other bus fans posting inferior photos? 2. since "DAF" is also related to inferior photos posted by other bus fans.
A1.
Originally posted by BusSpeeder:you can look at previous encounters, where even the older bus fans will not be tolerable of the attitudes and the negative comments of certain bus fans and flame or comment about them (whichever applies) as such.
A2. See page 1.
TIB969M on 187 (WLDEP 961)
-
-
Todays pic
TIB770T (WLDEP 169) on 911
TIB967T (WLDEP 969) on 969(sorry for blur pic)
and just for fun waiting for service 980 takes 50min?!
-
Originally posted by TIB770T:
Todays pic
TIB770T (WLDEP 169) on 911
TIB967T (WLDEP 969) on 969(sorry for blur pic)
and just for fun waiting for service 980 takes 50min?!
I can more or less guess who you are le ... ... -
Originally posted by TIB1049L:
I can more or less guess who you are le ... ...
who leh? -
Originally posted by TIB770T:
Todays pic
TIB770T (WLDEP 169) on 911
TIB967T (WLDEP 969) on 969(sorry for blur pic)
and just for fun waiting for service 980 takes 50min?!
I got 2 TIB770T on 911 (Today) pictures. I think both are not well shot.
-
Originally posted by Rk 2010:
I know your photo standards are way higher than others. But that doesn't entitle you to tell people off in this kind of manner. And it also doesn't mean that other people will follow your standards. This maybe a little way out of hand in my own point of view, but I guess I have said my own piece. I will not be the one saying this again in future. Hope you think twice before talking. Would really appreciate that.
Higher standard so what? Am I not allowed to go industrial area just to take photo of it? And what's more, I am not the only one who know about 896H on Sv257.
-
Originally posted by TIB770T:
Todays pic
and just for fun waiting for service 980 takes 50min?!
I think there's a part along Upper Thomson where the GPS signal cannot be detected. 167 has the same problem also.
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
jayh272416 likes this.
-
Enough le la. lol.
-
Originally posted by SMB66X:
the pic quite good how come u say not good lrh? oh and how come the EDS looks corrupted -
Originally posted by TIB770T:
the pic quite good how come u say not good lrh? oh and how come the EDS looks corruptedO.O
u call THAT good?
-
Originally posted by Simple_boi:
Higher standard so what? Am I not allowed to go industrial area just to take photo of it? And what's more, I am not the only one who know about 896H on Sv257.
yes, by all means go ahead to the industrial areas to shoot the photos you want. noone is going to stop you and noone can stop you from doing so.
however, that is not the key issue at hand here. the key issue is about your response towards others and whether taking that particular approach is absolutely necessary. so please don't try to sideslip Rk2010's question. our friend Rk2010, if you noticed, was not questioning you on your choice of LOCATION but rather on your choice of APPROACH toward JasonhSu92. granted jason may have been a little rude or confrontational but then again, was this approach totally called for? was it necessary at all?
if you're bold enough to come out with this approach, people would expect you to be bold and resolute enough to hold true to your stand when questioned, and not attempt to evade or divert attention to another issue which has absolutely no relevance to what was brought up.
-
Originally posted by Simple_boi:
Higher standard so what? Am I not allowed to go industrial area just to take photo of it? And what's more, I am not the only one who know about 896H on Sv257.
Being a senior of the local bus scene doesnt really give u the right to tell ppl off this way. Nobody has mentioned that they have problems with u going into the tuas area to take photo. You may have a car or smt or just garang to take bus all the way then so be it.
Before u want ppl to respect you, you respect others first.
-
Originally posted by SBS9818A:
yes, by all means go ahead to the industrial areas to shoot the photos you want. noone is going to stop you and noone can stop you from doing so.
however, that is not the key issue at hand here. the key issue is about your response towards others and whether taking that particular approach is absolutely necessary. so please don't try to sideslip Rk2010's question. our friend Rk2010, if you noticed, was not questioning you on your choice of LOCATION but rather on your choice of APPROACH toward JasonhSu92. granted jason may have been a little rude or confrontational but then again, was this approach totally called for? was it necessary at all?
if you're bold enough to come out with this approach, people would expect you to be bold and resolute enough to hold true to your stand when questioned, and not attempt to evade or divert attention to another issue which has absolutely no relevance to what was brought up.
Chill, I agree with you. No offence, but my take is that I find it very petty that just over a little confrontational post, that you get offensive, with your gang of friends and collectively criticise people. Are you that insecure?
It is like the astrologer who is an expert has the resource, the expertise for the research of astronomy and the simple amateur who just uses a simple telescope as a hobby for leisure and pleasure, just to look at the stars for fun.
I just don't get why people must conform to a certain pattern when they don't have the intention or the resource to do so. Be it a simple camera phone, it is still a work of art to the person who posts it, the person who bothered to take the time to post it up here to share it to the community. People should show respect to the author even though you make not like what he has presented.
-
Originally posted by TIB770T:
the pic quite good how come u say not good lrh? oh and how come the EDS looks corruptedThe Brightness abit too bright, I only take 3/4 of the bus. (First Picture)
The Brightness abit too dark, I only take the front of the bus. (Second Picture)The Second Picture will look nicer if the quality of the SBS8746E pictures was apply to the second Picture.
-
Originally posted by SBS9276M:
Chill, I agree with you. No offence, but my take is that I find it very petty that just over a little confrontational post, that you get offensive, with your gang of friends and collectively criticise people. Are you that insecure?
It is like the astrologer who is an expert has the resource, the expertise for the research of astronomy and the simple amateur who just uses a simple telescope as a hobby for leisure and pleasure, just to look at the stars for fun.
I just don't get why people must conform to a certain pattern when they don't have the intention or the resource to do so. Be it a simple camera phone, it is still a work of art to the person who posts it, the person who bothered to take the time to post it up here to share it to the community. People should show respect to the author even though you make not like what he has presented.
Totally agreed.
I'm not normally the kind who goes on the offensive at every slightest thing though. You must have mistaken me with someone else. =P
-
Originally posted by SBS9818A:
Totally agreed.
I'm not normally the kind who goes on the offensive at every slightest thing though. You must have mistaken me with someone else. =P
I apologise if the quote made it felt it was directed at you but it is not, it is to the people in the forum as a whole.
-
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
The term "DAF" is a derogatory term that has been uttered so often that one wonders if the perpetuators actually derive orgasm from the act.
Wow, you actually used this hobby to relate to your own disgusting fantasies.
