Redeployments (Part 10)
-
Originally posted by .SBS9888Y.:
SBS8077E
(ARBP 48
SLBP SP)SBS8679R
(BBDEP SP
ARBP 48)The 1st batch will leave sv48 once their ads expire if i m not wrong... capacity problems esp during peak n weekends
-
People already making noise of NO K230s deployment on sv145 in last wednesday's Zao bao
-
Making noise only, why Zao Bao wrote this??
-
Originally posted by Acx1688:
The only bus should merge is 179/96 w short trips from clementi int during morning/evening loading as it will link up the 2 varsities together!i think if the need arises, we'll carpool.
-
Originally posted by BiminiRosy:
Making noise only, why Zao Bao wrote this??
sme1 WROTE to zaobao 交� section[smethin like the ST Forum section] abt the new buses should be deployed on sv145 as its always using old buses[wic i find the merz still in excellent condition, able to speed, air con gd]
SBST[Tammy Tan] replied that facilities abt Buona Vista not ready to take K230UB yet...
i suspect its the exit used by sv32, sv145 and not used by sv48,74... -
Originally posted by Acx1688:
People already making noise of NO K230s deployment on sv145 in last wednesday's Zao bao
People starting to be like us :D Scania Lover...
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
the demand is there but it does not require full fleet DDs for Sv133...the demand is alway one directional during peak hours...
Add on the frequency of sv133 is adequate as the SDs comes quite fast
-
Originally posted by Acx1688:
The 1st batch will leave sv48 once their ads expire if i m not wrong... capacity problems esp during peak n weekends
Yeap esp morning peak towards Buona Vista. Often, passengers can't board at the Parkway, Amber Road and Tanjong Katong bus stop as it is usually full by then.
I am not sure if deploying Euro Vs will rectify the problem. Maybe they can consider adding 1 or 2 buses to the fleet or introduce more x-over trips.
-
Originally posted by Acx1688:
sme1 WROTE to zaobao 交� section[smethin like the ST Forum section] abt the new buses should be deployed on sv145 as its always using old buses[wic i find the merz still in excellent condition, able to speed, air con gd]
SBST[Tammy Tan] replied that facilities abt Buona Vista not ready to take K230UB yet...
i suspect its the exit used by sv32, sv145 and not used by sv48,74...
yes it isit's the exit to north buona vista rd... the other exit no problem
-
TIB 562 C might be perm 859 for now. I'm seeing the bus on 859 or inside Sembawang Interchange almost everyday.
-
Originally posted by Acx1688:
People already making noise of NO K230s deployment on sv145 in last wednesday's Zao bao
sad seh. last time so many complaints about KUB's. shoot the KUB's until jialat. now all want KUB to be introduced on more sv's? sad la sg. -
TIB731G and TIB733B still perm 858.
-
TIB823A is now perm 700. 700 now has an additional S1. And a question, since when did TIB560H become SP?
-
Yet another BBDEP Euro 5 send to SLBP:
SBS8681H
BBDEP SP
SLBP SPOn 183 today
-
Originally posted by Stage:
sad seh. last time so many complaints about KUB's. shoot the KUB's until jialat. now all want KUB to be introduced on more sv's? sad la sg.yOU HAVE NO CHOICE SG is infested w KUBs...
nw sadly cant even differentiate buses... -
Originally posted by SinkTel:
Yeap esp morning peak towards Buona Vista. Often, passengers can't board at the Parkway, Amber Road and Tanjong Katong bus stop as it is usually full by then.
I am not sure if deploying Euro Vs will rectify the problem. Maybe they can consider adding 1 or 2 buses to the fleet or introduce more x-over trips.
no it wont ...
i have highlighted the capacity problem but mre BB K230 SPs running on sv48 instead of striders/DM3500s/MKIIIs -
Originally posted by Acx1688:
no it wont ...
i have highlighted the capacity problem but mre BB K230 SPs running on sv48 instead of striders/DM3500s/MKIIIsDeploying more K230UBs makes sense because they have a higher standing capacity than other buses. It makes more sense for more people to be able to board the bus than for more people to have a seat and still face the same overcrowding problem. Additional trips would help to alleviate the problem.
-
Originally posted by SBS9818A:
Deploying more K230UBs makes sense because they have a higher standing capacity than other buses. It makes more sense for more people to be able to board the bus than for more people to have a seat and still face the same overcrowding problem. Additional trips would help to alleviate the problem.
You dun get my point...
people are standing on the bus but they would ve a seat if its was a Strider/DM3500, MKIII and there are a lot elderly, young parents w kids who uttilise this svc -
Originally posted by Acx1688:
You dun get my point...
people are standing on the bus but they would ve a seat if its was a Strider/DM3500, MKIII and there are a lot elderly, young parents w kids who uttilise this svcI get your point loud and clear.
Having more seats still does not solve the overloading problem. In fact by having more seats, it exacerbates the problem. I would rather be able to get on the bus than have to keep waiting and waiting to board the bus. And this is coming from someone who die die must have a seat when he takes a bus.
-
Originally posted by SBS9818A:
I get your point loud and clear.
Having more seats still does not solve the overloading problem. In fact by having more seats, it exacerbates the problem. I would rather be able to get on the bus than have to keep waiting and waiting to board the bus. And this is coming from someone who die die must have a seat when he takes a bus.
may i knw why service 48 cant have DD ? -
Originally posted by azharjj:
may i knw why service 48 cant have DD ?The stretch of Dunearn Rd outside SCGS has low-lying trees. That's the main issue with 48. Another thing is that DDs may not be able to cope with ascending the steep ramp at Rochor Rd towards ECP.
-
-double post-
-
Originally posted by off_service:
TIB 562 C might be perm 859 for now. I'm seeing the bus on 859 or inside Sembawang Interchange almost everyday.
No wonder TIB562C never do 187 nowadays whereas TIB498E keeps on cameoing on other WLDEP services, today on 171, ex-perm. -
Originally posted by SBS9818A:
I get your point loud and clear.
Having more seats still does not solve the overloading problem. In fact by having more seats, it exacerbates the problem. I would rather be able to get on the bus than have to keep waiting and waiting to board the bus. And this is coming from someone who die die must have a seat when he takes a bus.
hahaha but i carrying my 2 toddler so i prefer no so cramp bus...
Well if sv197 comes, i will board sv197 -
Originally posted by azharjj:
may i knw why service 48 cant have DD ?sv48 load eases up after Little India station daily...
load increases also from this stop evening peak...
DD not recommended