Originally posted by Stage:holy shit i just saw 3815 yesterday and 3819 on wed or thu.
3815/3819 both have their ezlink reader remove on wed night... parked at laid up corner since wed night... i dun think u saw 3815....
looks like the lay up speed for amdep is going to catch up with the slbp one.
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:looks like the lay up speed for amdep is going to catch up with the slbp one.
eh, SL scrapped merc under 39XX series long ago lor.. But AM/BR got more merc!
Originally posted by AEW5001:
i believe these deployments have kicked in on Fri
Actually it's next week... but East Dist depots like to put the new perm buses like 6 days before actual effective date...
Originally posted by TIB1232Z:
Actually it's next week... but East Dist depots like to put the new perm buses like 6 days before actual effective date...
coz i saw 508D on newly-permed sv139 ytd
SBS5058C
(AMDEP 402)
SBS3835P
(AMDEP 402
AMDEP SP)
SBS5060U SBS5061S SBS5111G
(AMDEP 58)
SBS501Y SBS882Y SBS1917A
(AMDEP 58
AMDEP SP)
SBS2750G
(ARBP 191
BBDEP 285)
SBS2805H
(BBDEP 285
ARBP 191)
Now 58 spam with more EEVs
SBS5056H SBS5057E
(AMDEP 269)
SBS3825T SBS3841X
(AMDEP 269
AMDEP SP)
-removed-
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:TIB 669D
WL 171 = WL 178 OR WL 852
Should take effect after one of the UDs have been laid
Please do not anticipate redeployments. Wait till the redeployments have been done and confirmed then we shall see what happens.
Originally posted by TIB1049L:
Please do not anticipate redeployments. Wait till the redeployments have been done and confirmed then we shall see what happens.
if you notice hard enough, 669D has been doing 178 in the recent weeks though, and it may be either 178 or 852 that gets it though, not that i want to anticipate, but it already showed signs of being a potential perm
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:if you notice hard enough, 669D has been doing 178 in the recent weeks though, and it may be either 178 or 852 that gets it though, not that i want to anticipate, but it already showed signs of being a potential perm
Just wait and see if it would be perm ... ... redeployments isn't meant to be done in a rush especially in the case of SMRTB's whereby there isn't really a way to confirm other than to observe, observe and observe
Originally posted by SBS2615P:SBS3835P
(AMDEP 402AMDEP SP)
SBS501Y SBS882Y SBS1917A
(AMDEP 58AMDEP SP)
i think 533 is the one that is out instead of 882. anw 3835 on 57 today.
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:if you notice hard enough, 669D has been doing 178 in the recent weeks though, and it may be either 178 or 852 that gets it though, not that i want to anticipate, but it already showed signs of being a potential perm
Look.
You ain't gonna win a million bucks in predictions like these.![]()
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
Look.You ain't gonna win a million bucks in predictions like these.
yeah yeah yeah, hate me for whatever reasons, and i'm not going to care, and i'm clear of that though
Originally posted by lemon1974:SBS5056H SBS5057E
(AMDEP 269)
SBS3825T SBS3841X
(AMDEP 269AMDEP SP)
269 gonna be WAB soon ![]()
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:yeah yeah yeah, hate me for whatever reasons, and i'm not going to care, and i'm clear of that though
dun be stubborn.... post it at the suspected redeployment thread, unless you have concrete proof that it is perm 178 or 852. Now you can even put as perm either 178 or 852? might as well put it as SP?
SBS272H
(BRBP 139)
(BRBP SP)
SBS3815Y
(BRBP 139)
(Awaiting De-registration)
SBS507G SBS508D
(BRBP SP)
(BRBP 139)
SBS3819L
(AMDEP 410)
(Awaiting De-registration)
SBS5059A
(AMDEP SP)
(AMDEP 410)
SBS3817S
(AMDEP CT8/268)
(Awaiting De-registration)
SBS466R
(AMDEP SP)
(AMDEP CT8/268)
SBS2647Y
(HGDEP 112)
(HGDEP 372)
SBS2666S
(HGDEP 372)
(HGDEP 112)
SBS807R
(BNDEP 31)
(BNDEP SP)
SBS1919U
(BNDEP SP)
(BNDEP 31)
SBS666E
(ARBP 16)
(BBDEP 92)
SBS1928T
(BBDEP 92)
(ARBP 16)
SBS694Z
(BBDEP 92)
(BBDEP SP) Service 92 short of 3 buses
CSS194M
(De-registered)
Originally posted by SMB66X:269 gonna be WAB soon
not really... most of its route are already covered by WAB...
Originally posted by lemon1974:dun be stubborn.... post it at the suspected redeployment thread, unless you have concrete proof that it is perm 178 or 852. Now you can even put as perm either 178 or 852? might as well put it as SP?
don't really see this bus on 171 often, and 178 has a bit of history of taking 171 perms before, 670Z was fomerly from 171 though, 669D may follow suit
now the problems is that if one of the UDs are gone for 178, it may be a perm, or replace 840A's slot (for 852)
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:yeah yeah yeah, hate me for whatever reasons, and i'm not going to care, and i'm clear of that though
sorry....you're only worth my time to type +1.....not hate.![]()
Originally posted by Stage:
i think 533 is the one that is out instead of 882. anw 3835 on 57 today.
533E's still perm. Not out most prob because of ad
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:don't really see this bus on 171 often, and 178 has a bit of history of taking 171 perms before, 670Z was fomerly from 171 though, 669D may follow suit
now the problems is that if one of the UDs are gone for 178, it may be a perm, or replace 840A's slot (for 852)
There's nothing to do with pattern. Please post such of your "logics" inside suspected deployment thread. Stop argueing in this thread.
And,
WL 171 is NOT equal to WL 178 or 852.
waah.... there goes all the 0405s......
Originally posted by sbs&tibs:
There's nothing to do with pattern. Please post such of your "logics" inside suspected deployment thread. Stop argueing in this thread.And,
WL 171 is NOT equal to WL 178 or 852.
whatever it is, if you think it is illogical, so be it, these are ones that i have been observing for a long time
= means confirmed, or on hold, k?