Redeployments (Part 11)

• sbst275

  29 Jun 10, 19:04

  Originally posted by ^tamago^:

  depends on how you see it. Mk IV can take in 84 pax, VO2x can take in 100 pax....

  they seem, because some of these were planned reductions after demand shifted to the Circle Line....

  
  wa VO2x licensed cap revised riao.

  In any case Sv 31, 33 also got reduction?

• TIB657M

  29 Jun 10, 19:15

  Originally posted by vodafone27:

  take single decks replace vo2x, wont have capacity problems with sv 93 and 74?
  

  
  Last time, KUB was also used to replace VO2x for 154.

• smrt3099

  29 Jun 10, 19:36

  I think they must have put enough DD in 154

• sbst275

  29 Jun 10, 19:39

  Originally posted by TIB657M:

  
  Last time, KUB was also used to replace VO2x for 154.

  
  If I did remember, removal for 3 VO2x for 4 KUB.

• SMB32T

  29 Jun 10, 22:16

  Originally posted by sbst275:

  
  If I did remember, removal for 3 VO2x for 4 KUB.

   

  1 was fleet add, 3 were replacing VO2x. All 4 were Batch 1 K230UBs formally from HGDEP.

   http://buses.sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/330680?page=77#

• One Harmonius Blend

  29 Jun 10, 23:26

  According on the roster at YIBP:

  TIB 1001Z

  WLDEP 856 - WLDEP 856/857

  TIB 674M

  WLDEP 178 - WLDEP 178/856.

  Please do not update in SG wiki though, And also need to have 565U's status checked.

• Apalis56

  30 Jun 10, 00:37

  Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:

  According on the roster at YIBP:

  TIB 1001Z

  WLDEP 856 - WLDEP 856/857

  TIB 674M

  WLDEP 178 - WLDEP 178/856.

  Please do not update in SG wiki though, And also need to have 565U's status checked.

  If u really cant confirm, u shld have posted this at Suspected Redeployments.

  In my opinion, I highly doubt that TIB1001Z will perm 857.

• Kiraâ„¢

  30 Jun 10, 00:42

  Originally posted by chikopek:

  But then even if the BBDEP SP VO2x gets redeployed to SLBP it might be surplus to requirements too as it can only deployed on some SLBP services (182, 192, 193 and JIS particularly as well as 179, 241 and 242 which have no perm VO2X in the fleet) plus SLBP have already have their share of SP VO2x. Unless they would like to deploy VO2X perms on services like 179, 241 and 242 which it seems rather impossible.

  
  242 seem impossible... why would sbs put VO2X on 2 WAB service? will destroy SBS reputation....

• smrt3099

  30 Jun 10, 01:07

  Not sure if VO2x can still put on 179, cuz demand still huge

• One Harmonius Blend

  30 Jun 10, 09:30

  Originally posted by Apalis56:

  If u really cant confirm, u shld have posted this at Suspected Redeployments.

  In my opinion, I highly doubt that TIB1001Z will perm 857.

  
  weekend perm for 1001Z

• Merczrox

  30 Jun 10, 09:46

  Originally posted by smrt3099:

  Not sure if VO2x can still put on 179, cuz demand still huge

  
  Got x-over wat....

• AEW5001

  30 Jun 10, 11:00

  Originally posted by smrt3099:

  Not sure if VO2x can still put on 179, cuz demand still huge

  
  occasionally sv179 still gets VO2x as cameos.

  higer chance if NTU is on sch holiday

• AEW5001

  30 Jun 10, 11:02

  Originally posted by Merczrox:

  
  Got x-over wat....

  
  very seldom x-over.

  it's only stated on paper.

• sbst275

  30 Jun 10, 18:26

  Originally posted by AEW5001:

  
  occasionally sv179 still gets VO2x as cameos.

  higer chance if NTU is on sch holiday

  
  It's perm.

  Crossover from Sv 255 during AM peak. But rarely on 179A instead.

• SMB92U

  30 Jun 10, 20:21

  Since 2 weeks ago:

  TIB1084J TIB1175E TIB1204E TIB1217T TIB1219M
  (KJDEP 180) (KJDEP 300)

  TIB1153T
  (KJDEP 67) (KJDEP 300)

  TIB873E TIB890E TIB895S TIB896P
  (KJDEP 300) (KJDEP 180)

  Needs confirmation:
  TIB874C TIB892A
  (KJDEP 300) (KJDEP SP)
  

• smrt3099

  30 Jun 10, 21:43

  Just now at CCK, I keep on seeing habit on 300 instead of the usual Mk 1

• SMB92U

  30 Jun 10, 21:49

  Originally posted by smrt3099:

  Just now at CCK, I keep on seeing habit on 300 instead of the usual Mk 1

  most of the 300 perms have gone to 180 already :s

• smrt3099

  30 Jun 10, 22:35

  Well the Mk 1 seats need replacement

• SBS7485P

  1 Jul 10, 00:34

  if only they could put on FAC svcs and make them PAC again :/

  i would select 78 79 98 240 334.

• TIB657M

  1 Jul 10, 09:14

  Originally posted by SMB92U:

  Since 2 weeks ago:

  TIB1084J TIB1175E TIB1204E TIB1217T TIB1219M
  (KJDEP 180) (KJDEP 300)

  TIB1153T
  (KJDEP 67) (KJDEP 300)

  TIB873E TIB890E TIB895S TIB896P
  (KJDEP 300) (KJDEP 180)

  Needs confirmation:
  TIB874C TIB892A
  (KJDEP 300) (KJDEP SP)

  
  TIB892A should be perm 180. And anybody spot TIB887R recently?

• Merczrox

  1 Jul 10, 12:38

  Originally posted by SBS7485P:

  if only they could put on FAC svcs and make them PAC again :/

  i would select 78 79 98 240 334.

  
  241.

• SMB92U

  1 Jul 10, 14:21

  Originally posted by TIB657M:

  
  TIB892A should be perm 180. And anybody spot TIB887R recently?

  i saw it running on 176 quite a couple of times. left TIB874C, i think that bus might be spare.

• TIB657M

  1 Jul 10, 15:25

  Add-on: TIB1157H TIB1214B go over as 302 permer. TIB1202K is seen doing 188 recently.

  And Smiley bendies, might spread around 67, 188 and 190.

• One Harmonius Blend

  1 Jul 10, 15:34

  884Z was seen on 180 today.

• ZYX2005

  1 Jul 10, 19:59

  Originally posted by QX179R:

  SBS9418X
  (Non-User Lay-Up Status till 11 Mar 2011 BNDEP SP)

  welcome back