Redeployments (Part 11)
-
Originally posted by Operation//Overkill:
u sure? Source?
you need not question TIB1232Z unless you doubt that his knowledge of redeployments is reliable and true. anw my comments for this deployment is that its a waste for 25 to get this bus. should just dump more leyland to 25. -
Originally posted by SBS Transit and SMRT:
If it's true, finally Mercs back on 52!!
its true durh. -
Originally posted by Stage:
you need not question TIB1232Z unless you doubt that his knowledge of redeployments is reliable and true. anw my comments for this deployment is that its a waste for 25 to get this bus. should just dump more leyland to 25.Why dump?? Anyway, a waste.... I rather dump VO3x into 25..... Ltr, sekali depot fire again, 7888K company 9888Y...... Touch wood. Deploy to 76 la! WAB service leh :)
-
Originally posted by TIB1232Z:
SBS8019X
(SL SP) - (SL 78) I think this is fixed...Temporary deployment schedule during YOG-effective period:
SBS1944X
(SL 78) - (SL 105)SBS2598E SBS2784J
(SL SP) - (SL 105)SBS8079Y SBS8107A SBS8155K
(SL 105) - (SL 179)SBS924K SBS928A SBS934G SBS944C
(SL SP) - (SL 66)SBS8108Y SBS8129L SBS8160U SBS8259U
(SL 66) - (SL 179)SBS415M SBS459L
(SL 179) - (SL 52)SBS441L
(SL SP) - (SL 52)SBS8054T SBS8065L SBS8293U
(SL 52) - (SL 179)SBS9291T SBS9311U SBS9365P SBS9375K SBS9379A
(SL 179) - (SL 241) Special schedule, boosted off-peak freq for Sv241SBS9009T SBS9015A SBS9028M SBS9064H SBS9065E SBS9080K SBS9088P SBS9092B SBS9094X SBS9100L SBS9111E SBS9128H SBS9131Y SBS9140X SBS9144K SBS9152L SBS9263A SBS9285L
(SL 179) - (SL SP)SBS8444B SBS8902X SBS9261E SBS9270D SBS9271B
(SL 199) - (SL SP)How come suddenly all the 179 buses become SP? YOG isit? Need shorter buses?? :D
-
Originally posted by Operation//Overkill:
How come suddenly all the 179 buses become SP? YOG isit? Need shorter buses?? :D
Maybe the looping point for the temporary 179 is not DD-friendly or demand for 179 is lower during YOG...
-
Originally posted by Operation//Overkill:
How come suddenly all the 179 buses become SP? YOG isit? Need shorter buses?? :D
when YOG start
Holiday Start for them .
-
Originally posted by Stage:
you need not question TIB1232Z unless you doubt that his knowledge of redeployments is reliable and true. anw my comments for this deployment is that its a waste for 25 to get this bus. should just dump more leyland to 25.
i say both 9646 and 7888 shld do sv25 perm, given their S shift demands.more leylands on sv133 will do.
-
SMB124L
(KJDEP SP) -> (AMDEP SP)
On 851 today
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
SMB124L
(KJDEP SP) -> (AMDEP SP)
On 851 today
AM keeps taking in OCs from KJ, as if their OC isn't enough though.Anyway, will there be any mercz going over to WL or KJ? Just wondering though, But I seriously doubt they will though since they have lack of O405 though.
-
no offences but IMO Sv 25 should be using LO3X or Batch 1 VO3x instead. It is a waster using new DDs on 25 as
1) It doesn't ply city area
2) The route is quite short
3) It is not a WAB service -
Originally posted by Operation//Overkill:
How come suddenly all the 179 buses become SP? YOG isit? Need shorter buses?? :D
Replaced by the kubs la bro.... -
Originally posted by chikopek:
no offences but IMO Sv 25 should be using LO3X or Batch 1 VO3x instead. It is a waster using new DDs on 25 as
1) It doesn't ply city area
2) The route is quite short
3) It is not a WAB service
Exactly.Tdy was my 1st time taking 7888K and i really enjoyed the ride.The bus can really perform very well.It wld b really nice for the bus also if it can get to run longer on a more long haul svc. -
Originally posted by TIB657M:
SMB124L
(KJDEP SP) -> (AMDEP SP)
On 851 today
Later the next OC is SMB123P.
-
Originally posted by Operation//Overkill:
How come suddenly all the 179 buses become SP? YOG isit? Need shorter buses?? :D
about 40% of the 179 fleet is already on spare status when NTU are having holidays. Now with YOG the remainder is temporarily removed from 179.So for this month be prepared to see more DDs on services with partial SD fleet.
-
Originally posted by chikopek:
no offences but IMO Sv 25 should be using LO3X or Batch 1 VO3x instead. It is a waster using new DDs on 25 as
1) It doesn't ply city area
2) The route is quite short
3) It is not a WAB service*sigh* really wasted lor to have redeployed it to sv25, haven't even tried riding on the kud although 133 is one of the services i frequent the most. wonder how long is it going to stay as sv25 perm..
-
You won't die just because the bus is redeployed to 25. And neither is 25 a lousy service to begin with. Don't ridicule yourself with your misconceptions. Just get that demo bus moving will do.
-
Originally posted by Merczrox:
Exactly.Tdy was my 1st time taking 7888K and i really enjoyed the ride.The bus can really perform very well.It wld b really nice for the bus also if it can get to run longer on a more long haul svc.166 :D
-
I feel they put it on 25 because most commuters haven chosen the bus over MRT.... duplicates Circle Line in a way.... plus competes with 854 to some extent.... which justifies why they have to make the service comfortable.... putting it on 161 or 168 would be nice though... LOL... =)
-
I say it once more. The depot fire is purely coincidence which it happened on Sv 25 parking lot in AMDEP. Don't keep using the depot fire as an excuse to not deploy bus to Sv 25. Seriously, I do not understand some people stupid brains on why people must argue here and there of why must this bus go this service must go that service don't perm this service don't perm that service etc. First and foremost, it's not as if the bus will be taken out and you won't get to ride on it anymore. I don't see any problem deploying the bus on Sv 25 though. Be it Sv 133, Sv 25 etc the bus itself you all can catch it at AMK INT. For those who are not happy of the bus being deployed on Sv 25, either live with it or don't take it for goodness sake.
-
Originally posted by chikopek:
no offences but IMO Sv 25 should be using LO3X or Batch 1 VO3x instead. It is a waster using new DDs on 25 as
1) It doesn't ply city area
2) The route is quite short
3) It is not a WAB serviceSv72/76/21/88 all should not be using B9 as well, since they do not ply City Area if your logic is true..
Sv25 is a cash cow service and there are reasons why it have VSO, and then B9 fleet.
This SBS7888K is on trial, that why it is being put on different service to try out. Who know it might go onto another service two months later. -
is SBS5002M (SL 79) temporary deployed to AMDEP? Spotted it at AMDEP this morning...
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
is SBS5002M (SL 79) temporary deployed to AMDEP? Spotted it at AMDEP this morning...
Spotted it too just 2 days ago, it was parking inside AMDEP...
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
Sv72/76/21/88 all should not be using B9 as well, since they do not ply City Area if your logic is true..
Sv25 is a cash cow service and there are reasons why it have VSO, and then B9 fleet.
This SBS7888K is on trial, that why it is being put on different service to try out. Who know it might go onto another service two months later.
just fyi 88's demand is higher than 21 25 72 76 if im not wrong. <: -
Originally posted by Stage:
just fyi 88's demand is higher than 21 25 72 76 if im not wrong. <:in my opinion, Sv88 did have high demand, but i think its demand is not higher than sv25 or sv72.. Both Sv25/72/88 have around 25 buses (of which 20-21 are DD per service). but distance covered by Sv 25 is 14.7km one way, Sv 72 - 17km, Sv88 - 24 km...
if sv88 did have higher demand, then it should have more buses as compare to Sv25/72 as the distance travelled is much longer and so as to maintain the same frequency as sv25/72. -
Originally posted by lemon1974:
Sv72/76/21/88 all should not be using B9 as well, since they do not ply City Area if your logic is true..
Sv25 is a cash cow service and there are reasons why it have VSO, and then B9 fleet.
This SBS7888K is on trial, that why it is being put on different service to try out. Who know it might go onto another service two months later.WAB service..... And what u mean by cash cow service???