Redeployments (Part 11)
-
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
What time did you always saw (TIB) 967T on 961?The sequence should be in this manner though:
WL (AM) WL (AM) WL (AM) WL (AM) so on and forth though.
So if I am not wrong after an AM 961 bus come in should be 967T though.
where got such nice sequence? not easy for planning and waste of diesel only. further i did saw 501 and 502 bunched up together and alway saw one WL 961 OC, follow by another WL 961 OC..
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
cos of skyliner ad....
why not kub can have skyliner? -
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
What time did you always saw (TIB) 967T on 961?The sequence should be in this manner though:
WL (AM) WL (AM) WL (AM) WL (AM) so on and forth though.
So if I am not wrong after an AM 961 bus come in should be 967T though.
what kind of logic is this? throughout my 4 years with 961, i haven't even have chance to see such a great pattern as listed by you. please, if you are not sure, dun act smart.
-
Originally posted by Kira™:
Why would SLBP Swap a Mk4 for KUB on 154? It is because 932 is also on 154?
phoenix 2d popup ad.
-
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
why not kub can have skyliner?it will look ugly.
-
SBS3920B
(SLBP SP
SLBP 030)Perm sticker seen.
Should be replacing sw801 SBS0419C
-
Originally posted by sbs&tibs:
SBS3920B
(SLBP SP SLBP 030)Perm sticker seen.
Should be replacing sw801 SBS0419C
alr reported earlier (: it is perm.
-
Originally posted by TIB1051D:
what kind of logic is this? throughout my 4 years with 961, i haven't even have chance to see such a great pattern as listed by you. please, if you are not sure, dun act smart.
Think whatever you like. That is just my assumption and that's that.
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
where got such nice sequence? not easy for planning and waste of diesel only. further i did saw 501 and 502 bunched up together and alway saw one WL 961 OC, follow by another WL 961 OC..
Look, I only assume, You don't accept then leave it. -
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
why not kub can have skyliner?
i believe it's e roofing of e ks that makes it difficult to build skyliners. -
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
Look, I only assume, You don't accept then leave it.
i sometimes wonder why you want to take those redeployment / observations seriously.. bus is just a bus what.. it doesnt affect you / us in any manner right.. -
Originally posted by SMB92U:
i sometimes wonder why you want to take those redeployment / observations seriously.. bus is just a bus what.. it doesnt affect you / us in any manner right..
Even though it doesn't affect me and you guys in any manner, But some people will always like to pick on me for no reason though, I don't get anything nice from it I agree, But sometimes I have other stuffs to attend to(and I really do), and my observations aren't that accurate, people here will start attacking me like a swarm of bees do.Even if a rare cameo like 757H doesn't come on, I will concentrade on other stuffs, Because that is the dispatcher's discretion. And I respect that.
I don't wish for any replies after this, You guys can think whatever you like, I am not going to force what you guys think either.
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
cos of skyliner ad....
I see... -
Originally posted by TIB433S:
TIB587G
(WLDEP 966 > WLDEP 911E*/966/963*)
Covered under 966S151.TIB587G was on 911E today, in the evening. But rear with a 911 Desto. Anyway, that BC was a 912 BC which was the malay bc with a specs.
-
Originally posted by SMB66X:
TIB587G was on 911E today, in the evening. But rear with a 911 Desto. Anyway, that BC was a 912 BC which was the malay bc with a specs.
what?! is it a crossover slot?
-
Originally posted by TIB1051D:
what?! is it a crossover slot?
You should know which BC. Not sure if it's a crossover slot as it did more than 3 rounds of street 82 sides only.
-
Originally posted by SMB66X:
You should know which BC. Not sure if it's a crossover slot as it did more than 3 rounds of street 82 sides only.
hmm...it's ok. i'll try to find out. thanks anyway. seems like we're going a bit off-topic.
-
SBS490U
(Non User Lay Up till 04 Mar 2010) -
Originally posted by SBS2615P:
SBS490U
(Non User Lay Up till 04 Mar 2010)
As expected..... I never spot this guy cameoing for more than 1 month liao. -
Originally posted by SMB66X:
You should know which BC. Not sure if it's a crossover slot as it did more than 3 rounds of street 82 sides only.
Don't have any timesheet with duty code just as the 901/902/969 bus? -
Originally posted by SBS7485P:
SBS485K
(AMDEP SP Awaiting Lay Up)
on 166 today. -
Originally posted by TIB657M:
Don't have any timesheet with duty code just as the 901/902/969 bus?Not sure.
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
As expected..... I never spot this guy cameoing for more than 1 month liao.
No wonder u everytime asked ard ah if tis bus was laid up....And nw its really laid up.
And nw the lay up pattern seems to b changing also.They picking any buses and laying them up 1st instead of laying up the whole batch wen the expriry date comes.Tink tis r the problematic buses which they cant seem to fix.... -
Originally posted by Stage:
on 166 today.
!!!! -
SMB123P
(KJDEP SP > KJDEP 75)