Suspected redeployments

• Apalis56

  13 Apr 10, 22:51

   

  Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:

  On hold:

  TIB 473B

  WLDEP SP => WLDEP 858

  TIB 780P

  WLDEP 966 => WLDEP 966/969

  Not the first time both buses on their respective services though, 473B on 858 almost everyday, while 780P should be replacing 781L's slot

  TIB 473B on 858 shld be confirmed I tink.. rmb TIB 505T/504X? It seemed that SMRT has just deployed another bus to svc 858, most probably after teh opening of KTPH. After teh opening of KTPH, I spotted 473B plying 858 everyday.  

• TIB657M

  14 Apr 10, 16:31

  Suspect:

  TIB739K
  (WLDEP 961) -> (WLDEP 187)
  Has doing doing 187 since Saturday, replace one of the missing buses?
  TIB469P
  (KJDEP 970) -> (KJDEP SP)
  SMB109G
  (KJDEP SP) -> (KJDEP 970)

• transportspartan

  14 Apr 10, 18:48

  SMB134H

  (WLDEP SP)  (WLDEP 960)

• TIB657M

  14 Apr 10, 19:49

  Originally posted by transportspartan:

  SMB134H

  (WLDEP SP)  (WLDEP 960)

  
  SMB134H is 'famous' on cameoing one service frequently.

  Last time when SMB119C to SMB122S permed 187, SMB134H also frequently cameoed on this service for almost everyday, else they will do either 961 or training. Of course, they also did rare cameo on 852, 962, 966.

• SMB66X

  14 Apr 10, 19:55

  Originally posted by TIB657M:

  
  SMB134H is 'famous' on cameoing one service frequently.

  Last time when SMB119C to SMB122S permed 187, SMB134H also frequently cameoed on this service for almost everyday, else they will do either 961 or training.

  I am wondering why only SMB119C - 122S are moving around and became perm then went to another service to become perm on certain service like 961, 187 and not SMB128B - SMB133K?

• TIB433S

  15 Apr 10, 08:34

  I have had enough. Clearly... this thread was a mistake by me, and all I wanted it to do was to divert the attention away from the Re-deployments threat (which may not have worked). 

  Let me give you guys something, and I am going to be as kind as I possibly can. SMRT deployments are extremely hard to follow. Ever since the 2008 Depot Transfers, bus deployments have been messy and they have been hard to follow. Even I find it hard to keep track. I have given up on caring about SO many service bus deployments already. I am going to only focus on those which I think concern me, and I think you guys should do the same. Don't give too much attention to every SMRT service, because there's always going to be a change. Even if Bus A is perm of Svc A in week 1, it may do Svc B in week 2 and so on. 

  My point here is quite simple, I would like to request for one thing, and you guys have two choices. Either the moderators close this silly thread or you guys can continue posting here and not vandalising SGWiki with your false information. It really is getting on my nerves. And also, I am getting messages in unwanted places about bus deployments, which I don't find necessary at all. 

  I end here by saying, don't make bus deployments your life. And if you do find ANY confirmed redeployments, post it on the deployments section. Otherwise, please keep quiet, as now this whole bus deployment thing is getting out of hand thanks to a few people who frequently vandalize SGWiKi and the forum, after all the hard work for many years the people who contribute to these pages did, do you think it's fair to them to just edit as you please and confuse everybody? You think about it.

• lemon1974

  15 Apr 10, 10:23

  it is usually the same few persons who like to edit Sgwiki... and like to anyhow confirm the redeployment of SMRT services. i think it will be better to lock up all the pages in the SMRT deployment in Sgwiki. limit the access to certain people will do..  i can see people who posted SMB120 is SP one day and then post that SMB120 is still perm 187 the following day.

  and we can see a lot of people like to confirm that certain SMRT buses are perm for certain services for weekend.. what is the point of confirming that it is perm for weekend? for weekend, definitely there will be excess buses around...

• SMB66X

  15 Apr 10, 14:46

  Originally posted by lemon1974:

  it is usually the same few persons who like to edit Sgwiki... and like to anyhow confirm the redeployment of SMRT services. i think it will be better to lock up all the pages in the SMRT deployment in Sgwiki. limit the access to certain people will do..  i can see people who posted SMB120 is SP one day and then post that SMB120 is still perm 187 the following day.

  and we can see a lot of people like to confirm that certain SMRT buses are perm for certain services for weekend.. what is the point of confirming that it is perm for weekend? for weekend, definitely there will be excess buses around...

  100% Not me as I do not have time to edit the Sgwiki. Will only do if someone forgotten to update the confirmed deployment. 

• One Harmonius Blend

  15 Apr 10, 19:38

  On hold:

  TIB 571B

  WLDEP 961 => WLDEP 178

  Should either be a perm, swap or taking 637X's slot

• SMB92U

  15 Apr 10, 22:38

  Suspects:

  SMB61J
  (KJDEP 307 > KJDEP SP)
  
  Perm BC spotted doing random perm/cameo OCs for the past two weeks. He drives 60L today. I need to check again the next few days (or next week) to confirm.

• TIB770T

  16 Apr 10, 17:13

  Originally posted by TIB657M:

  Suspect:

  TIB739K
  (WLDEP 961) -> (WLDEP 187)
  Has doing doing 187 since Saturday, replace one of the missing buses?
  

  Did 961 yesterday

• Edan2009

  16 Apr 10, 19:46

  Suspect:

  TIB700X(KJDEP 172 to KJDEP 985)

  SMB71E(KJDEP SP to KJDEP 970)

  TIB720M(KJDEP 927 to KJDEP 985)

• TIB657M

  16 Apr 10, 20:03

  Originally posted by Edan2009:

  Suspect:

  SMB71E(KJDEP SP to KJDEP 970)

  TIB720M(KJDEP 927 to KJDEP 985)

  SMB71E is perm 970 liao

  TIB720M is on 927 today.

• SMB92U

  16 Apr 10, 22:27

  Originally posted by SMB92U:

  Suspects:

  SMB61J
  (KJDEP 307 > KJDEP SP)
  
  Perm BC spotted doing random perm/cameo OCs for the past two weeks. He drives 60L today. I need to check again the next few days (or next week) to confirm.

  today's observation: 61J perm BC drives 40U for one whole day. 61J totally gets replaced by 89E as a full day cameo today.

• SMB32T

  19 Apr 10, 23:18

  SBS1916C and SBS1947M does service 70 regularly these days, might be perm.

  And also SBS509B seems to have MIA from service 70 since last week.

• Edan2009

  20 Apr 10, 19:53

  Suspect:

  SMB103Y(KJDEP 970 to KJDEP 190)[Been doing 190 for ages...]

• SBS2692R

  21 Apr 10, 01:36

  Originally posted by SMB32T:

  SBS1916C and SBS1947M does service 70 regularly these days, might be perm.

  And also SBS509B seems to have MIA from service 70 since last week.

  1916C did 58 yesterday. Okay just now. haha.
  1947M has a perm 70 guide cut out at the BC's cabin. Not sure though.
  509B, saw it still on 70 just a few days ago. (:

• Junyang700

  21 Apr 10, 21:00

  Service 966's deployment on Sgwiki seems ambiguous.
  
  5 split shifts, but all buses recorded as if its full day perm.
  
  I suggest putting asteriks on buses that only does split shift.
  
  The 5 split shift buses are:
  
  TIB520Z
  TIB780P
  TIB781L
  TIB564Y
  TIB565U

• One Harmonius Blend

  21 Apr 10, 21:55

  Originally posted by Junyang700:

  Service 966's deployment on Sgwiki seems ambiguous.
  
  5 split shifts, but all buses recorded as if its full day perm.
  
  I suggest putting asteriks on buses that only does split shift.
  
  The 5 split shift buses are:
  
  TIB520Z
  TIB780P
  TIB781L
  TIB564Y
  TIB565U

  781L on 857 today, swap with 472D not sure if it is a full day, 565U did 852 S

• SMB66X

  21 Apr 10, 22:19

  Originally posted by Junyang700:

  Service 966's deployment on Sgwiki seems ambiguous.
  
  5 split shifts, but all buses recorded as if its full day perm.
  
  I suggest putting asteriks on buses that only does split shift.
  
  The 5 split shift buses are:
  
  TIB520Z
  TIB780P
  TIB781L
  TIB564Y
  TIB565U

  TIB780P - 911E/187

• Junyang700

  21 Apr 10, 23:39

  Eh... I am suspecting its perm deployment.
  
  Those stated are split shift buses permanent.
  
  Not today's cameo.

• TIB657M

  22 Apr 10, 09:23

  Originally posted by Junyang700:

  Service 966's deployment on Sgwiki seems ambiguous.
  
  5 split shifts, but all buses recorded as if its full day perm.
  
  I suggest putting asteriks on buses that only does split shift.
  
  The 5 split shift buses are:
  
  TIB520Z
  TIB780P
  TIB781L
  TIB564Y
  TIB565U

  I am suspecting one of 966 permers will go over to 187 (not x-over) during PM-shift. TIB780P does that frequently.

  Monday- TIB780P
  Tuesday- TIB777A
  They left WRI at around 6.15pm.

• Junyang700

  22 Apr 10, 10:06

  Originally posted by TIB657M:

  I am suspecting one of 966 permers will go over to 187 (not x-over) during PM-shift. TIB780P does that frequently.

  Monday- TIB780P
  Tuesday- TIB777A
  They left WRI at around 6.15pm.

  I see.

• Junyang700

  22 Apr 10, 10:10

  Originally posted by Edan2009:

  Suspect:

  SMB103Y(KJDEP 970 to KJDEP 190)[Been doing 190 for ages...]

  Yes. Its perm 190. But so far nobody has managed to find which bus it replaces.
  
  I suspect its TIB601Z. I havent seen this bus on 190 for ages.
  
  970's deployment on Sgwiki has one extra bus, can remove actually.
  SMB103Y no longer part of 970.
  
  Lets confirm if TIB601Z is no longer part of 190 bah?

• TIB1234T

  22 Apr 10, 22:45

  Suspect TIB959S PM shift 963. Been seeing it doing 963 every evening.