Originally posted by service_238:
confirmed for 7562/9073if 9075 replaced 9191 then who replaced 9040?
9075 replace 9040?
Originally posted by service_238:
confirmed for 7562/9073if 9075 replaced 9191 then who replaced 9040?
9191 havent gone case yet.. still on 98 today.
OK i know the mystery replacement for 9040. it is 9075
Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
9191 havent gone case yet.. still on 98 today.OK i know the mystery replacement for 9040. it is 9075
Ya, 9191 runs till 26 April 2011.
Nope,GLBP should at least have tyre change and minor svc bay,What happen if morning SL check tyre bald or deflate?Tow all the way to AMDEP?Defeat the purpose of having Bus park.167 should park at SEBP regardless.856 actually can park at WL no prob.There's enough space at WLDEP since they implemented ONP at WRI.SEBP should only allow AMDEP buses park due to space.
Originally posted by SBS8930P:9075 replace 9040?
then why u said 9075 replaced 9191? the logic is just not there.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Nope,GLBP should at least have tyre change and minor svc bay,What happen if morning SL check tyre bald or deflate?Tow all the way to AMDEP?Defeat the purpose of having Bus park.167 should park at SEBP regardless.856 actually can park at WL no prob.There's enough space at WLDEP since they implemented ONP at WRI.SEBP should only allow AMDEP buses park due to space.
IMO no sense then where does that leave the WL 167 side with? If all 7 start at merah then it makes sense to have it parked at GLBP OVN granted it's a bit far but no point having to park at AM can leave atleast 5 lots for buses starting at YI (856) and IMO SEBP WL OVN should be a minority control since AMDEP have no space.
granted 856 can park at WL no prob but SE more nearer for YI start.
Suspecting:
SBS9318B
(SLBP 97
SLBP 242)
Suspected replacement for SBS9176T. Bus had been doing Service 242 consistently.
@ service_238: Apologies for the error post of SBS9075B replacing SBS9191Z. Edited.
Originally posted by SBS8930P:Suspecting:
SBS9318B
(SLBP 97SLBP 242)
Suspected replacement for SBS9176T. Bus had been doing Service 242 consistently.
@ service_238: Apologies for the error post of SBS9075B replacing SBS9191Z. Edited.
ok
then where's 9363? went to 97?
Originally posted by service_238:ok
then where's 9363? went to 97?
today 98
9191 will stay till last day....
Suspecting 8820 is on 59, replacing 5177S
Originally posted by service_238:ok
then where's 9363? went to 97?
I dun think 9363 is out of 241 yet. Last saturday still on 241.... I dun think it had ever went to 242 before....
Is 7571 still on svc 154?? Doing svc 30 for many days.
From this week
SBS5186R on 238
SBS5236E on 232
SBS8101R on 238
Note that these 3 buses act very perm
I suspect SBS8153R & SBS8906K swapped with each other
Originally posted by SBS8730A:From this week
SBS5186R on 238
SBS5236E on 232
SBS8101R on 238Note that these 3 buses act very perm
8088X is in AMDEP workshop... BRBP short of SD SP buses (KUB)... so Sv131 took either 1901/1913 while give up its KUB as SP for the time being... likewise for Sv60. Sv60 use more Wrights nowadays for the time being. so the KUBs are used as spare these few weeks...
Originally posted by SBS8730A:From this week
SBS5186R on 238
SBS5236E on 232
SBS8101R on 238Note that these 3 buses act very perm
Also, SBS8095Y also spotted on 238.
For SBS5236E, SBS8126U is MIA for now. I'm assuming that it went for maintainence? But it went for maintainence just a few weeks or months back. I know that SBS5236E is still SPARE as of now as it does not bear the "SV 232" stix. Just need to observe for the next few days.
Suspecting:
TIB830D
(KJDEP SP
KJDEP 970)
Doing 970 for many days now.
I hope they can perm 5236E to 232, 8126U is an useless bus to me
Originally posted by SBS8730A:I hope they can perm 5236E to 232, 8126U is an useless bus to me
hahahahahaa.. :)
Suspecting:
SBS899A
(AMDEP SP
AMDEP 135/138*)
Suspecting:
TIB1193C
(WLDEP/WRDEP 903)
(WLDEP 913)
:o
Originally posted by TIBbc:Suspecting:
TIB1193C
(WLDEP/WRDEP 903)(WLDEP 913)
:o
Confirmed not perm, 1193C not on 913 today i think.
Nope..it was on 913 ytd..which Is 29/04/11
Originally posted by TIBbc:Nope..it was on 913 ytd..which Is 29/04/11
But was the rearmost door's Ez-link card reader for the right side installed back? If not then it is just chain cameo-ing.