SBS 9413 J on 23 for 2 weeks already
SBS2743C
(ARBP 111
BBDEP 156)
SBS2737X
(BBDEP 156
ARBP 111)
9063K (SL SP) --> (SL 51)
SBS 9067A, SBS 9156B to Service 249
Service 241 deployment
SBS 7629S replace SBS 7555X
SBS 7555X replace SBS 9496U
One 143 bus replace SBS 8891T
SBS1916C (AM 138 > AM 124)?
Every evening see it around Telok Blangah at 6pm or so.
SBS9649X
(BNDEP 23)
(BNDEP 31)
SBS9413J
(BNDEP 31)
(BNDEP 23)
Originally posted by service_238:Is 9290 perm 98? If not (and also not fleet add) who has he been consistently replacing these few months?
9191 which deregistered?
9074 replaced 9191, unless he didnt.Originally posted by JaSoNhSu92:
9191 which deregistered?
Originally posted by service_238:9074 replaced 9191, unless he didnt.
i don't think so..
Dunno hw true or not this info given by friends who work in SMRT starting next year 970 will be partial KJ/AM,75 and 858,960,966 partial WL/AM.167/169/882/926,969 become full WL.171 become full AM,Funny leh.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Dunno hw true or not this info given by friends who work in SMRT starting next year 970 will be partial KJ/AM,75 and 858,960,966 partial WL/AM.167/169/882/926,969 become full WL.171 become full AM,Funny leh.
75 and 960 I can close one eye, 858 is a must, 966 would prefer to stay other WL, 882 should have been under WL for so long dunno why AMDEP wants to keep 882 for what 169 and 969 can't go under WL for common sense, WL 171 I'd prefer to stay where is it and not mess around with it.
Originally posted by Spanish hog:SBS1916C (AM 138 > AM 124)?
Every evening see it around Telok Blangah at 6pm or so.
910A still on Sv124 as well right? might be replacing one of the KUB, while Sv138 use the SP citaro....
Originally posted by chickenlittle2:SBS 9067A, SBS 9156B to Service 249
Service 241 deployment
SBS 7629S replace SBS 7555X
SBS 7555X replace SBS 9496U
One 143 bus replace SBS 8891T
So which 143 bus replace 8891 on 241 eh? I'm curious. Observe these few days and saw no bus from 143. You sure?
Originally posted by TIB783G:75 and 960 I can close one eye, 858 is a must, 966 would prefer to stay other WL, 882 should have been under WL for so long dunno why AMDEP wants to keep 882 for what 169 and 969 can't go under WL for common sense, WL 171 I'd prefer to stay where is it and not mess around with it.
Probably MCT & SWT is much nearer in KM from AMDEP?169 AMK also not far from WLDEP.969 a bit confused leh,If they wanna AM control some of CGA(858) and MP(966) why not Tampines too?The distance from the Eastern side to WLDEP also can consider far..171 case i think AMDEP is much nearer to both sides.Probably the WL171 buses can go to 167.926 also common sense to be under WL.
Originally posted by TIB783G:75 and 960 I can close one eye, 858 is a must, 966 would prefer to stay other WL, 882 should have been under WL for so long dunno why AMDEP wants to keep 882 for what 169 and 969 can't go under WL for common sense, WL 171 I'd prefer to stay where is it and not mess around with it.
858 I think is advisable not to move to AMDEP.
Originally posted by SMB116K:Oh okay. If you want to hear, you can go take 190's SMB86M. The driver likes to play that recording continuously at Orchard Area. I took it a few times b4 and hear the recording more than 50 times on a ride from Orchard Rd to CCK...
Sorry for the outdated reply. I have heard the recording on Monday 8/8/2011 on SMB124L doing 858 when so many passengers are inside the bus. The record was played multiple times, and the SL is also telling others to move to the rear.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Probably MCT & SWT is much nearer in KM from AMDEP?169 AMK also not far from WLDEP.969 a bit confused leh,If they wanna AM control some of CGA(858) and MP(966) why not Tampines too?The distance from the Eastern side to WLDEP also can consider far..171 case i think AMDEP is much nearer to both sides.Probably the WL171 buses can go to 167.926 also common sense to be under WL.
In short I would still prefer things as they are, If 965 can go full WL I don't see why 966 can't, WL 171 only AM01-AM06 under WLDEP so starting from YI no biggie, But if AM01-06 starts from MCT, Then its a different matter altogether.
Oh and for 167's case it would be best if it stays AM.
Originally posted by SBS8155K:SBS6061K
(BNDEP SP > BNDEP 222)
It is on 222 again today?
Originally posted by SBS8155K:SBS6061K
(BNDEP SP > BNDEP 222)
invalid.
Originally posted by Kira™:So which 143 bus replace 8891 on 241 eh? I'm curious. Observe these few days and saw no bus from 143. You sure?
"these few days and saw no bus from 143" erm, pls refer to Cameo spotting thread..
SBS7619X
(SLBP SP)
(SLBP 51)
SBS7663S SBS7667G SBS7678A
(AMDEP SP)
(AMDEP 168)
SBS9616R SBS9618K SBS9632T
(AMDEP 168)
(AMDEP SP)
Suspect:
SBS7275D
ARBP 91
SLBP 257
SBS9363U
SLBP SP
SLBP 181
SBS9513D
BBDEP 99?/SP?
ARBP 91
SBS9466G
BBDEP SP
ARBP 91
Originally posted by chikopek:Suspect:
SBS7275D
ARBP 91SLBP 257
SBS9363U
SLBP SPSLBP 181
SBS9513D
BBDEP 99?/SP?ARBP 91
SBS9466G
BBDEP SPARBP 91
If all of 91 NAC's fleet had been redeployed to other services then it is good.