Questions about S'pore buses? Post them here! (Part VI)
-
Is there any reason why 2,12,54,174 can't come under ARBP's control, even though the NB area is like not really far from AR, since Harbor Front came under AR's control?
-
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:
Is there any reason why 2,12,54,174 can't come under ARBP's control, even though the NB area is like not really far from AR, since Harbor Front came under AR's control?
cos new bridge rd terminal is under the purview of Bishan Route Group. -
Originally posted by service_238:
cos new bridge rd terminal is under the purview of Bishan Route Group.So bishan route group is controlled by AMK?
remembered they let 190 go under AMK control, but in the end ended up full KJ control.
-
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:
So bishan route group is controlled by AMK?
remembered they let 190 go under AMK control, but in the end ended up full KJ control.
this is SBSTransit's Bishan Route Group. no relation to SMRT's operating management methods.
when 190 was under SBS then, buses were from BBDEP. -
Originally posted by sinicker:
this is SBSTransit's Bishan Route Group. no relation to SMRT's operating management methods.
when 190 was under SBS then, buses were from BBDEP.
If I remember correctly Bishan Route Group controls Bishan (duh), New Bridge Rd and Marina South (or was it Shenton Way I can't remember). Funny that Toa Payoh seems closer to town yet it doesn't take charge of the terminals in town. x.XJust like how 170 falls under Serangoon Route Group... -.-
-
What are the font names of the front destos?
-
Originally posted by TIB1232Z:
If I remember correctly Bishan Route Group controls Bishan (duh), New Bridge Rd and Marina South (or was it Shenton Way I can't remember). Funny that Toa Payoh seems closer to town yet it doesn't take charge of the terminals in town. x.XJust like how 170 falls under Serangoon Route Group... -.-
Shenton Way.
If Bishan route group controls NBR, why didn't they take in 2,12 and 174?
-
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:
Shenton Way.
If Bishan route group controls NBR, why didn't they take in 2,12 and 174?
can travel fast to east & west with ECP and AYE nearby?
what would be the primary objective of having them under Bishan Route Group?
just look at 1st bus timing for service 12 at NBR Ter on Sundays/PHs.
-
sometimes on saturdays or fridays, there are people who go to the airport for recreational purposes and even to send friends off in large groups...
giving an analogy, coupled with those going home from the afternoon shift, the last service 27 bus is packed already and at T2, there's no more space.
those who cannot board, GG? find your own alternative transportation? -
Originally posted by sinicker:
can travel fast to east & west with ECP and AYE nearby?
what would be the primary objective of having them under Bishan Route Group?
just look at 1st bus timing for service 12 at NBR Ter on Sundays/PHs.What about AR? can what, not really that far off
-
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:
What about AR? can what, not really that far off
You keep asking for them to be under arbp control. What is the main objective?
Single depot control is normally preferred as its easier for the OCC/controlling route group/service rep to take charge of the service. In addition service 12 comes with jump bus. If put dual depot that would not be possible.
2 and 12 are already under east district, why want to be under br/am?
And you still think that amdep has space to accommodate more services ah?
Originally posted by TIB1232Z:
If I remember correctly Bishan Route Group controls Bishan (duh), New Bridge Rd and Marina South (or was it Shenton Way I can't remember). Funny that Toa Payoh seems closer to town yet it doesn't take charge of the terminals in town. x.XJust like how 170 falls under Serangoon Route Group... -.-
Cos Toa Payoh Route Group is too large to accommodate any terminals to be under its purview. Bishan only got 8 routes now under its charge. -
Originally posted by sinicker:
sometimes on saturdays or fridays, there are people who go to the airport for recreational purposes and even to send friends off in large groups...
giving an analogy, coupled with those going home from the afternoon shift, the last service 27 bus is packed already and at T2, there's no more space.
those who cannot board, GG? find your own alternative transportation?
Was wondering if there are new added resources, could SBS do a special P shift bus.. Either early evening do Sv 74 or 151 (Esp 151, over e 18 mins freq w/ 151A). Then aft 8pm do Sv 27 duty. -
Originally posted by service_238:
Single depot control is normally preferred as its easier for the OCC/controlling route group/service rep to take charge of the service. In addition service 12 comes with jump bus. If put dual depot that would not be possible.
agreed. the trend now is not have single depot control as far as possible.
-
some peeps are too troll to understand anything.
-
Originally posted by service_238:
You keep asking for them to be under arbp control. What is the main objective?
ARBP more easier to reach town what, especially HBF comes under AR
Not saying it is a must, but just a suggestion though, No point having single depot control for services in NBR to go under their respective depot.
-
1 good thing abt having single depot control is that e freq of svcs are much more in control.
-
Originally posted by SBS7485P:
do you think its convenient for Bishan RG BCs to change shift at NBR? have you considered that sv12 adopts clowbus currently? many svcs have been deployed this way for heritage reasons. have you heard of the phrase when its not broken dun fix it. dun go and make more issues.
did i make issues? no right? so what's the big fuss? i was just asking questions about why NBR doesn't come under AR, that's all
-
Originally posted by One Harmonius Blend:
No point having single depot control for services in NBR to go under their respective depot.
Explain why it is "No point having single depot control for services in NBR to go under their respective depot."
i wanna hear what is the problem with it?
-
Originally posted by SBS7485P:
Explain why it is "No point having single depot control for services in NBR to go under their respective depot."
i wanna hear what is the problem with it?
The reason for this is: If HBF can come under AR, why not NBR?, since they aren't miles apart
-
why did i bother to feed the troll
-
troll
-
Originally posted by SBS7485P:
why did i bother to feed the troll
seriously, why not just admit that you hate me, instead of using name-callings such as troll?
-
Originally posted by SBS7485P:
ARBP is pretty much well loaded already. it would be overloading itself. its got buona vista, bukit merah and harbourfront.
also, i dun see the need for ARBP to take NBR.
you are the one who made the fuss. you said why didnt Bishan take in NBR svcs.
the answer for that has already been given
-
terrible attitude in receiving replies to questions
-
Originally posted by Bus and Train LoVuR:
What are the font names of the front destos?
normal, ff meta, avante garde and arial unicode