Originally posted by sbst191:
cause not needed, so simple :)
Yep.
74 doesnt need DDs either in that case.
Originally posted by SBS2601D:Yep.
74 doesnt need DDs either in that case.
Just put Citaro Gs! 195 have bendy before! Love to see Citaro G at Lornie Road!!
Guys.
Please remember not to feed the troll.
Thanks.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:How much did SBS pay for the 200 Scania N113CRBs?
$43mil 1989 Singapore Dollars.
This could found in old straits times archives in newspapers.nl.sg.
http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19890616.2.9.6.aspx
Originally posted by Bus Stopping:$43mil 1989 Singapore Dollars.
This could found in old straits times archives in newspapers.nl.sg.
http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19890616.2.9.6.aspx
Originally posted by Bus Stopping:$43mil 1989 Singapore Dollars.
This could found in old straits times archives in newspapers.nl.sg.
http://newspapers.nl.sg/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19890616.2.9.6.aspx
Thanks.
Originally posted by SMB228X:Just put Citaro Gs! 195 have bendy before! Love to see Citaro G at Lornie Road!!
Heh heh heh. Did 195 even ply Lornie Road in the first place?
is there any way to hide SMB228X's posts?
and also, is it because of an obstacle at the sawtooth berths, that did not allow 73, 157, 163 and 238 to become WAB?
Originally posted by SMB128B:is there any way to hide SMB228X's posts?
No. The only way is to remove it but only moderators can do that.
Originally posted by SMB128B:and also, is it because of an obstacle at the sawtooth berths, that did not allow 73, 157, 163 and 238 to become WAB?
Now the problem for 157 and 163 seems to be solved, ever since the boarding points had been moved forward to join in with 231.
Originally posted by Myhabit:No. The only way is to remove it but only moderators can do that.
Seems that the moderators are not doing anything to remove all the nonsense posts made by the clone users nowdays... I remember tamago can do that.
The moderators are definitely monitoring the posts but they can't be expected to change everyone's opinions into theirs. This is a free forum where one is responsible for their own postings, and I can't be removing all of someone's posts as they can simply create another clone account. This functuality is best provided if the forum is powered by bulletin board suites with personalised ignore list.
What is the difference between Bus park and Bus depot? I understand that ARBP is a bus park because it is so small and without much facilities...But SLBP is the OCC for west district and yet it is call a bus park? It can park way more buses than ARBP, it also has refueling stations, workshops etc....
I hope they can build more multi-storey depot...
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:Now the problem for 157 and 163 seems to be solved, ever since the boarding points had been moved forward to join in with 231.
OMG WHEN DOD THAT HAPPEN???!!!!!!
GREAT! 163 is going to be WAB then!
Now to wait for the Citaros to replace the two MKIII, making it 60% WAB.
Originally posted by SMB128B:OMG WHEN DOD THAT HAPPEN???!!!!!!
GREAT! 163 is going to be WAB then!
Now to wait for the Citaros to replace the two MKIII, making it 60% WAB.
Originally posted by SMB228X:
YES!!!!!! Citaros coming to 113 and 163!!! :D
113 citaro is doubtful. 163 great possibility, given its current load ( if B10M can do 163, why can't Citaros?)
Originally posted by Gus.chong:Heh heh heh. Did 195 even ply Lornie Road in the first place?
He sure dunno a f*** abt 195. He simply juz went to the accident thread, saw the post on SBS831J and assumed 195 plied Lornie Rd. That bus did not even ply 195 when it burned down. Useless motherf***er this guy is.
Originally posted by SMB128B:OMG WHEN DOD THAT HAPPEN???!!!!!!
GREAT! 163 is going to be WAB then!
Now to wait for the Citaros to replace the two MKIII, making it 60% WAB.
Should be the day when 231G and 231W integrated to become 231, hence it only required one queue.
Originally posted by SMB228X:
YES!!!!!! Citaros coming to 113 and 163!!! :D
![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:Should be the day when 231G and 231W integrated to become 231, hence it only required one queue.
Then it saved a lot of problems and trouble.
Originally posted by SMB128B:113 citaro is doubtful. 163 great possibility, given its current load ( if B10M can do 163, why can't Citaros?)
why is citaro on 113 doubtful?
I still dont get why some sv at tpy cant be wab. can someone explain to me? thanks
Originally posted by Tranzort08:I still dont get why some sv at tpy cant be wab. can someone explain to me? thanks
observe tpy int itself closely and u'll know why.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:Then it saved a lot of problems and trouble.
Wow I didnt know that Toa Payoh Int faced so much 'problems' and 'troubles' when svc 231 had 2 plates..What a great logic of yours.Simply amazing..![]()