Redeployments (Part 12)
-
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
Ok long story short, Want to trust the roster, or go by observations, up to you, I won't go further. Don't forget things can change anytime so don't be surprised if 852 goes back to the old way after sometime.
And 852 has been stucking with the secondary perm fleets for many years liao.
-
852 roster still relect 5 perm Lances.If happen any one of the OCs appear then i consider its cameo due to preventive maintenance of the perm buses.If the same OCs keep on appearing for months then can consider perm.Same case for the UD that appear on 852,Its just a cameo for 1010Y.Ditto for 960 which 1105H and random bendies cameo for 1159 & 1227
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
852 roster still relect 5 perm Lances.If happen any one of the OCs appear then i consider its cameo due to preventive maintenance of the perm buses.If the same OCs keep on appearing for months then can consider perm.Same case for the UD that appear on 852,Its just a cameo for 1010Y.Ditto for 960 which 1105H and random bendies cameo for 1159 & 1227
Preventive maintainence can't take very long lime 2 moths what atmost a few weeks only. -
Originally posted by TIB657M:
And 852 has been stucking with the secondary perm fleets for many years liao.
Don't forget 980 even though OC cameos are common -
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
Lets don't fight now.... Maybe I don't want to repeat the 119C to 122S deployment last time, cameoed for about 2 months, then reverted back to full Lance for AM 985 last time. Let time tells. If 2 months later still the same as now, which means roster is not accurate at all. But if those perm Lance returns to 852, which means that roster might be correct.
I still remember a number of CSS rego Nissan UDs like CSS191X and CSS192T once stuck to service 980's fleet followed by 187 in 2006. However these CSS regos were never reflected in the rosters at all (980 only had 1 perm s-shift which was either TIB1254K or CSS183U). Until they officially became perm service 852 under WLDEP.
-
TIB448A and TIB449Y
(WL 950
WL 912)TIB458X and TIB459T
(WL 912
WL 950) -
Does 858 do OVNP at WLBP? Someone in SGWiki edited that 858 does park OVN at WLBP.
-
Notice
The following redeployments had been confirmed by TIB657M.Confirmed by TIB657M
SBS7530S
(SLBP 143 SLBP 30)SMB66X
(KJDEP 188/941/945 KJDEP SP)SMB137A
(KJDEP SP KJDEP 188/941/945)To AEW5001 and JaSoNhSu92:
Please refer to TIB657M on the truth of the following redeployments if you have any queries regarding these redeployments. I apologise for any inconvenience caused if the redeployments are wrong. -
SBS9048E
(SLBP 30
SLBP 97)Perm Sticker spotted. Nobody post it yet so i post first.
-
Originally posted by SBS8930P:
Notice
The following redeployments had been confirmed by TIB657M.Confirmed by TIB657M
SBS7530S
(SLBP 143 SLBP 30)SMB66X
(KJDEP 188/941/945 KJDEP SP)SMB137A
(KJDEP SP KJDEP 188/941/945)To AEW5001 and JaSoNhSu92:
Please refer to TIB657M on the truth of the following redeployments if you have any queries regarding these redeployments. I apologise for any inconvenience caused if the redeployments are wrong.7530S to 143, I doubt it was 30 perm in the 1st place
-
Originally posted by Kira™:
SBS9048M
(SLBP 30
SLBP 97)Perm Sticker spotted. Nobody post it yet so i post first.
9048E or 9028M?
Replace which perm LO, 9053P?
-
Originally posted by SBS8675B:
I still remember a number of CSS rego Nissan UDs like CSS191X and CSS192T once stuck to service 980's fleet followed by 187 in 2006. However these CSS regos were never reflected in the rosters at all (980 only had 1 perm s-shift which was either TIB1254K or CSS183U). Until they officially became perm service 852 under WLDEP.
Add-on: AM 167 was also stuck on OC fleet for long-term cameos until they went to perm RWS8 and got back those perm Lances after that.
-
Is TIB568L still 178S102 permer? Since last week has been sticking on ex-perm 187....
-
From TIB657M
SBS7538X SBS7550J SBS7553B
(BBDEP SP BBDEP 99)
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
Add-on: AM 167 was also stuck on OC fleet for long-term cameos until they went to perm RWS8 and got back those perm Lances after that.
If I am not wrong it was due to advert contracts that sent those lances back on 167 or was it something else?oh by the way, it seems to be confirmed that the 3 ocs and 2 mercz belongs to 852, can someone edit sgwiki regarding this?
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
Is TIB568L still 178S102 permer? Since last week has been sticking on ex-perm 187....
Seriously the whole thing is messy to begin with.TIB742A ok lah still can accept as S-shift perm status somewhat like TIB480E not sure if TIB480E is a full day start but the 178 S102 remains to be seen so 568L still spare.
-
TIB585L should be 858 perm bus.
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
9048E or 9028M?
Replace which perm LO, 9053P?
Ps my typo.... It 9048E. Regrading which LO i not sure.
-
Originally posted by Kira™:
Ps my typo.... It 9048E. Regrading which LO i not sure.
9103D which got decommissioned -
Originally posted by service_238:
9103D which got decommissionedYet nobody had discovered that 9103D was de-registered until I checked OM today.
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
Yet nobody had discovered that 9103D was de-registered until I checked OM today.
dereg quite some time alrd. we no longer post redeployments here.
-
SBS8079Y (SLBP 105
SLBP 243) -
Originally posted by SBS BUSES LOVER:
SBS8079Y (SLBP 105
SLBP 243)SBS2991C goes over opposite direction instead
-
Originally posted by TIB657M:
Yet nobody had discovered that 9103D was de-registered until I checked OM today.
i have already posted it one month ago, 9096/9098/9103/9106/9110 were deregistered together.
http://buses.sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/410406?page=41#post_10125084