Originally posted by AEW5001:
i'd rather allow certain svcs like 852, 853, 854, 855 to go WAB asap.
Not possible at the moment except for 854 until they finish renovating the berths at yishun interchange.
857 and 853 might be first to get WAB status because the route is pretty much fully WAB friendly other than a few stops and yishun interchange. 852 and 855 still have to wait for bb int and hbf int to get their wab friendly berths before it can even get the status.
Originally posted by carbikebus:854 better stays in AMDEP.There’s more than enough buses.858 AMDEP should at least take in 4 duties..167 can give full WLDEP.858 AMDEP PM shift can change at CGA just like S36..Morning first bus can revised from 0613 to 0605
but CGA no timekeeper for changing shifts right?
Originally posted by carbikebus:No clock in/out monitor you mean…dun worry they can start/end their shift using the IDFC on e bus itself.
what if PM shift guy never come?
Originally posted by TIB1234T:Citaros are more suitable for 858 since it goes to CGA. More reliable and stable.
I don't think that a service should have more than 20 buses.
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
There's only 200 LOs.And the VOs share commonality in many areas, even if they have different engines.
Weight the costs and the benefits. Spreading of risk vs economies of scale.
Excuse me, there are 400, of which 200 of them were de-registered.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
I don't think that a service should have more than 20 buses.
What i mean is to redeploy some of its perm OCs to like SP/187/960/961, then let the Citaros cover the slots.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
I don't think that a service should have more than 20 buses.
What you talking??
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
I don't think that a service should have more than 20 buses.
So you mean SBST should cut 170's fleet from 45 to 20? 170 is going to be chaotic like that.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
I don't think that a service should have more than 20 buses.
u go try that and see wad will happen to majority of the svcs.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:what if PM shift guy never come?
Able to confirm Citaros will have rear sliding plug doors, but deployments are still not known yet.
Rephrase: It is confirmed officially that Citaros will have rear sliding plud doors, and there are only TEN Citaros purchased.
Wah... Citaros. Nice to see dem on da roads soon. I wonder if dey would b fitted wif a 7 litre engine or 12 litre engine.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:Excuse me, there are 400, of which 200 of them were de-registered.
How are there 400 LO3x when there's 671 Olympians?
9XXX - 91XX are LO3x. 92XX - 9670 are Volvo.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
I don't think that a service should have more than 20 buses.
Ok then, 190 would go w/ 12 mins peak hr frequency. As for 170, it'll go w/ 60 mins frequency, later dun come and tell me need more buses cos too many ppl taking. pwned
Many of wat you typed is of no logic and you go around saying ppl talk no logic
From Junyang700:
SMB139U was doing testing/training at CCK Int. Time: 2.04PM
Suspect this bus would be under KJDEP.
Did he manage to guess the EDS model? haha
note: checked with LTA's website, and none of the production Citaros are registered
Originally posted by Veyron16.4:note: checked with LTA's website, and none of the production Citaros are registered
PTOs who register buses after 10th can don't pay 5% extra.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:PTOs who register buses after 10th can don't pay 5% extra.
LOL.. 2 more days!
Originally posted by ^tamago^:PTOs who register buses after 10th can don't pay 5% extra.
That's why SBST decided to register more Wrights after 10th?
Originally posted by TIB1234T:From Junyang700:
SMB139U was doing testing/training at CCK Int. Time: 2.04PM
Suspect this bus would be under KJDEP.
Have to see since KJ kicked 3 buses out SMB106P SMB113T TIB809S so might stand a chance.
AMDEP wise still have not signalled their intention as of yet. Those buses which has expired ads might be cleared out.